Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
The most amazing ukelele playing you will ever see (Jake Shimabukuro)
*dead
Time Lapse: Building a Boeing 777
*beg
Famous Failures, and why you should never give up.
If at first you don't succeed then redefine success.
Zero Punctuation: Grand Theft Auto IV
*nsfw
Joe Hisaishi - Jinsei no merry-go-round Howl's Moving Castle
Can you *beg for other people's videos? This needs to be published.
Screw Gordon Ramsey, this is the real hell's kitchen.
I think I've seen this on the sift before . . . but I'm too lazy to look.
Upvote.
"Montreal" -- cute singer travels like a suitcase
Glad to help.
Unassisted Triple Play
*dead
Stephen Hawking: Asking big questions about the universe
*long
Illinois State Representative Spews Hate at Atheist
A lot of times when people don't understand or disagree with someone else's position, they create aspects within it that have never been stated in order to maintain their dislike. In this case, she brings up two very non sequitor arguments. The first one is that this atheist must support guns in schools because to her that is the opposite and equal reaction to being opposed to prayer in schools. Her second argument is that because this man is an atheist, he must be a supporter of destruction and opposed to progress.
Now, granted I don't know who the atheist in question is or a specific layout of his particular beliefs, but I do believe she would use the same pathos based non sequitor arguments against me. In which I would first respond by saying that an opposition to prayer in public schools is not synonymous with the desire to have guns in schools. If one were to believe that, than it could be argued that when our founding fathers drafted the 1st Amendment of our Constitution, they inadvertantly supported guns in schools through the Establishment Clause. It is not difficult to see that this argument does not work. My second response to her vitriole, is that as an atheist, I do not in any way favor destruction. In fact, I exalt human progress and achievement. To strive for anything less would be immoral and wrong.
Oh, yes, one last comment. Her belief that it is dangerous for children to even know that his philosophy exists. She is denying children in the state of Illinois, or anywhere for that matter, the right to figure out things for themselves. She, in essence, is denying them the right to think. To question her own belief system, to her is an attack, and she will not allow it. Hardly the founding principles of this country.
The Way Battles Should Be Fought - Breakdancing Koreans
*begging for world peace . . . or at least a published video
Videosift mentioned on a JimmyR tutorial video
At 7:01, you can see my Late Golden Star and my SN.
The Star Wars Videogame Retrospective Part 2
This was great! I remember playing all of the Super Star Wars on SNES. Good times, good times.
Viper Intro - The future was then!
I thought this show was awesome when I was 13, or wait, 94, 8 years old! I used to watch this and Highlander with my grandma.
Masturbation: Gateway to Homosexuality
"Masturbation is sex with someone you love." - Woody Allen