So do we all please agree that the guy walking behind them must had to of walked backwards to give the reversed clip more doubt of authenticity and amazement for the viewer?

Yea, love it. At first you are like: "Aw hell, another crazy christian redneck with guns doing stupid shit" and then you are like "whoa! equations! this guy is pretty cool!" lol

Interesting profile of how religious people cannot see morals without putting "GOD" in the picture. That somehow without god, how could we possibly know what is right and wrong? Its painfully innocent, naive and ultimately stupid.

It is a shame such a presentation of statistics and future projections is held solely on the morality given by Ze Almighty, with such biased reading of data / obsessive criteria, and not give much importance at all to the human spirit or trust in the wisdom of the mind in society from where we now know all criteria originates.

Its like presenting a new iphone 5 with only 2G and then saying it works by miracles caused by angel music. Degrading, to say the least.

*beg

>> ^gorillaman:

B-D-D-D-D


OMG! You heartless bastard!

wow! how completely cruel, yet not... but bear in mind, the ending is NOT giving it justice, AT ALL!

just legalize/regularize it already... I promise the world will be a better place! no, wait, I swear it!

this little piggy went to the market...
... aaaaand THIS little piggy went...

Hi Osama, i believe those photos were longer exposures, hence the lighting of the clouds and mountains by small amounts of light from either the near-by city or possibly the moon behind the camera. I think many of those shots are possible and only possible with constant long exposure shots put together into a sequence clip. With a good enough camera and lens, these shots can be achieved with 1+ sec exposure time, although with so much detail, I would expect longer exposures whilst the diaphragm can be less open so as to avoid overexposure.

On another note, doesn't the sequence of scenes seem like a modern version of the qatsi series?


>> ^osama1234:

I do like this video, but could someone with photography knowledge explain/verify to me that the kind of timelapse he's done is in many scenes impossible to see with the naked eye, or even a time-lapse consisting of (not two images meshed together) long exposure photos, without mixing together multiple pictures, and possibly pictures from different times (day vs night). (I find it impossible to imagine how he shot stars in daytime in between clouds (1:50), or the scene where the stars are visible in broad daylight while the mountain is also visible in daylight).

That's pretty cool, its not only left and right but front back and up and down. I thought he was going to tickle me! (I figure it was a guy from the way he walked, his weight, and the materiality of his shoes, considering the hands at the beginning were quite androgynous)

you gotta be shitn me!!

Most people are not conscious of what our priorities should be as a society, as a specie, nor will they spend money on such priorities, even if they were they are easily distract-able. Most people follow the priorities told to them, particularly when these make sense in ego-rationale. That is the essence of pop-culture, consumer societies and marketing.

I lost it at the disk saw...

>> ^ant:

Why did they laugh?
Wow for the white car that made it alive.


it all makes sense when you imagine you were on some drug, even stoned... I believe that is why they laugh, not because they think spontaneous violence is funny, but because it is very stimulating for the senses and imagination... maybe?