looks pretty real to me... I grew up with people like this at my school. She's totally in her natural character in my opinion.

Ban it?!?!?! But it's correct... it IS a myth!

I'd tap that. Trololololo

What the hell.. these people are being racist.. what color is Chewie? Oh and would there be any white people in the "black" star wars? I doubt it. Fucking racists.

She says Nuclear the same way Bush does... Incorrectly.

I don't understand why some people love her. Yes she's pretty, but she's also pretty dumb. I suppose some people just relish the thought of fiasco politics, as if they get off on a comedy of blundering errors in positions of power. Didn't she condone book burning a few years back? Could you imagine if someone like this were to come into office? Just think of the executive orders that would pass through her desk. It'd be worse than Bush's I'll bet.

On that note, what's with Obama signing executive orders? Wasn't he supposed to dismantle some of Bushs and promised not to abuse it as well? Sigh, this is what we get for going along with the old two party system. It's sad because even any 3rd party that emerges gets hijacked by one of these two parties as well. I guess we're stuck with whatever we're told are "supercandidates". It's really sad... really sad indeed.

I thought this interesting since they are releasing a sequel next year:
http://xbox360.ign.com/objects/143/14323746.html

I like her timeline.. It goes back millions of years... so which is it? millions or thousands? These religious ppl can't seem to make up their minds. Also thanks for the FEAR-mongering. Choose NOW!!! or burn in hell for eternity. Gimme a break.

Not to mention that a couple years after being commemorated as such a fine All-American company, they now get many of their Halloween peeps products made in China. Is it really that cost effective to get Chinese plants on the other side of the world to make marshmallow-like treats as opposed to making them here? Given the quality of products we've been getting from China would it matter to you?

Sry, I was just kidding Yogi. I agree with you, these people are going way too far and should be arrested.

>> ^Yogi:

This isn't ok, aren't we going to arrest these people for threats?


Like vigilantes? Yeah let's do it! I'll go get some torches, meet outside their houses in an hour. Let's get us some justice!!!

This is a great idea. Once you get down to the level of having to eat Stouffers microwavable dinners the next step is dog food under a bridge. Hopefully this will save a few lives.

*beg for the wonderful fantastic fluoride wooohooo!!!!!

Wow! First off why in the world would anyone think this would be a fun wedding game?!?! Second off aren't you supposed to use a revolver in Russian roulette? Thirdly, I'm amazed that others seemed eager to take their turn. This is definitely a top candidate for EIA awards.

I'm surprised this isn't getting any more than two votes since this is touted as one of the top 10 greatest acheivements of the 20th century.

Isn't this the greatest thing since sliced bread?

I did find an interesting study conducted by the CDC regarding fluoride:

http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp11-c6.pdf

In Conclusion they state:

"Recent data are available on the concentration of fluoride in different foods in Canada and the
daily dietary intakes for different Canadian age groups (Dabeka and McKenzie 1995). However, recent
analogous information is not available for the United States. Up-to-date data on concentrations of
fluoride in food items and the dietary intake of fluorides in the United States is important in view of the
changes in fluoride emissions and the effect that the use of fluoridated water or water with a high natural
fluoride content may have on the fluoride levels in processed food and beverages (Pang et al. 1992).

The total human intake is of interest, since multiple sources, all of which are generally considered safe by
themselves, could, under some circumstances, provide total intake that is considered to be above the
"safe" level.

No exposure registries for fluorides were located. This compound is not
currently one of the compounds for which a subregistry has been established in the National Exposure
Registry. The compound will be considered in the future when chemical selection is made for
subregistries to be established. The information that is amassed in the National Exposure Registry
facilitates the epidemiological research needed to assess adverse health outcomes that may be related to
the exposure to this compound."