search results matching tag: missle
» channel: motorsports
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (21) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (2) | Comments (110) |
Videos (21) | Sift Talk (0) | Blogs (2) | Comments (110) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
"The Political News Media Lost Its Mind"
Just remember... while there is a Congress that *might* temper some of his proposals... there's no Congress between him and the button (and the fact that he has said he would not rule out a first strike nuclear attack against somebody in the Middle East and Europe... and he also might not protect our European allies if attacked if they haven't paid). There's no Congress between him and him launching an initial retaliatory strike for making jestures... No matter how bad Hillary is, she isn't ready to destroy the world and start a nuclear holicast the way Trump is more than willing to do. Also, the lone wolf attacks we've seen the last year or so will only greatly increase under Trump as he and his ideals, implemented or not, incite futher self radicalization, by people who won't need contacts, they'll just be upset that the US is targeting Islam as a whole specifically, not just the jehadist... and remember, it looks like he'll win as he is winning in states like Florida and Ohio... When those nuclear missles rain into the United States, remember, those voiting for him, you specifically knew that would happen and you chose to destroy the world by voting for an egomaniac that has no clue how to be diplomatic, who has no clue how the real world works... who thinks the world opperates just like a boardroom... or one of his appartments where he kept black people out...
Javelin Missile Fails - 246K Each
*killed by a TOW missle!
*dead
The Most Costly Joke in History
The sheer energy advantage of jet aircraft overwhelms any maneuverability advantages of WWII aircraft, so when a modern aircraft can't outturn and/or out-energy a 40 year old fighter, it's a steaming pile of shit...
And it's always completely irrelevant until it's completely relevant. eg. new technology comes online jamming guided missles and reducing planes to cannon warfare...
And I'd love to see how your prancing sniper does when he has to get in to knife range (close ground support where cannon fire does matter...).
The plane is an overpriced turd that has been repeatedly polished to give it the shine of a gem, but ultimately it's still a turd.
I love the last line though... "then the rest of the enemies would be mopped up by..." By? By the 40 year old workhorses that the turd is supposed to replace... X D
The F-35 will replace the US Air Force A-10s and F-16s, US Navy F/A-18s, US Marine Corps AV-8B Harriers and F/A-18s, and UK Harrier GR7s and Sea Harrier
Two of your three mop up planes are already F35's. Good luck with that!
The F-35 can't maneuver as well as an F-16. But F-16 can't maneuver as well as P-51 from World War 2.
There hasn't been a dog fight since the first world war. Even in WW2 it was about strategy, positioning and team work. It had very little to do with plane performance, expect for when there was a huge gap like the invention of the jet plane.
Air combat for the last 60 years has been about situational awareness first and foremost. And the F-35 has this nailed.
It's like saying that modern soldiers don't have any sword fighting skills. It's completely irrelevant. You wouldn't use a sword against a camouflaged sniper. The F-35 is a camouflaged sniper, hiding in the trees. Who would silly enough to run through an open field with a sword? Or even a pistol? The sniper will have killed you before you even know you are being targeted.
Now the people making the F-35 are probably incompetent in delivering a plane on time and on budget(either that or they are milking it). But the plane once finished, will be a winner.
The other thing is, the F-35's will always be part of a force of other planes in a large scale conflict. If for some reason it does come down to dog fighting - e.g. if there are just tons of cheaper planes going against it (with suicidal pilots) that they simply cannot carry enough missiles, then the rest of the enemies would be mopped up by F-15, F-16s , F/A-18s etc.
What is Israel to Do?(answer: get out of occupied territory)
If Mexico shot 2000 rockets into the US, do you think we as a nation would overlook that or do you think we would attack? I'm not in favor of war but I think the idea that Israel should allow Hamas, a known terrorist organization, to shoot missles into its territory with impunity is simply a hypocritical double standard that we would never follow in the same situation.
grinter (Member Profile)
Your video, What does it look like if someone fires a missle at you?, has made it into the Top 15 New Videos listing. Congratulations on your achievement. For your contribution you have been awarded 1 Power Point.
This achievement has earned you your "Pop Star" Level 15 Badge!
What does it look like if someone fires a missle at you?
*wtf
Missle?
F-111 Performing A Dump And Burn After A Touch And Go
Does anyone know if this is the planes actual afterburner? I can't see how this is usefull otherwise?
And if it is the afterburner it doesn't seem logical. A heatseeking missle would LOVE it. Night stealth would be impossible.
edit: according to OP afterburner seems to be separate, that makes this feature even more puzzling to me? Why not dump from wings like other planes?
Mistletoe Kissing Prank
I'm still trying to picture what missle toes would look like
Super Cool Way To Launch A Missile From A Ship
>> ^nomino:
TURDS?>> ^ReverendTed:
>> ^eric3579:
Anyone know what the name of this system is?
"Trans-Underwater Rocket Delivery System", obviously.
It was either that or Forestalled Aquatic Rocket Takeoff System.
Super Cool Way To Launch A Missile From A Ship
TURDS?>> ^ReverendTed:
>> ^eric3579:
Anyone know what the name of this system is?
"Trans-Underwater Rocket Delivery System", obviously.
Super Cool Way To Launch A Missile From A Ship
>> ^rellik:
What if a whale ate it before it took off?
I can see the marketing now:
"A taste that will blow your mind!"
Super Cool Way To Launch A Missile From A Ship
>> ^eric3579:
Anyone know what the name of this system is?
"Trans-Underwater Rocket Delivery System", obviously.
Super Cool Way To Launch A Missile From A Ship
>> ^eric3579:
Up to 45km. http://www.qwiki.com/q/RPK-2_Viyuga
>> ^Nebosuke:
It seems like an inefficient system. These missiles must not go very far.
So it compares to a UUM-44 SUBROC... a missile developed in 1958, finished in 1963, and never deployed. "A type of submarine-launched rocket deployed by the United States Navy as an anti-submarine weapon." Wow... the Russians are showing off advanced weaponry...
Super Cool Way To Launch A Missile From A Ship
>> ^Unsung_Hero:
>> ^surfingyt:
thats pretty cool. i wonder how many college tuitions each one cost.
Perhaps you should move to a country where they don't spend very much money on their military... Have fun earning your college degree in Gambia.
Oh and.. Just a heads up, there might be a correlation between a nations wealth (The ability to house institutions with quality education) and their military status.
-deleted, not worth the argument
Super Cool Way To Launch A Missile From A Ship
Up to 45km. http://www.qwiki.com/q/RPK-2_Viyuga
>> ^Nebosuke:
It seems like an inefficient system. These missiles must not go very far.