Oh, I hate how these right wing wankers enjoy terror attacks. Disgusting!

If the media used such terms it would encourage widespread racism and vigilante-ism against a whole group of people that don't deserve it, or have anything to do with it.
By not using Islam or Muslim in their descriptions of these attacks, the media is practicing a good deal of social-responsibility, because hindsight teaches us what happens when you place entire groups of people under the umbrella defined by a few.

We should just use "angry person" as a synonym for "terrorist", and understand that Western culture is an offense to the rest of the world, and needs to change. If you don't think your culture needs to change, look at your politics, look at your economy, look at your communities, and consider that all this violence might actually be in response to the same things you're mad at yourself.

Um....white racists have done most of those things and more in the past, just in different places and to different people, and most don't get much coverage, and certainly we don't ascribe their actions to all white people.

Whites have drug blacks behind their trucks by the neck, burned them, burned their churches, murdered multiple blacks in their churches, shot hundreds, assaulted, raped, abused, denied medical treatments, denied police protection, experimented on, denied service to, denied employment to, attempted to deny voting to (and thrown away their vote if they manage to vote) blacks....but you never hear the media say the words "white terrorists" or "Christian terrorists".

@newtboy
@artician
@dingens

Love it .. All above sifter have their heads up their buts.
The guy is right. If this crap being done was by NAZIs the left would be up in arms.
*promote

Nazi's were a militant political movement that had an agenda for genocide.
Islam is a religion that includes people who are acting militantly and citing their beliefs.

Islam != Nazi's
Islam = Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, et al

This would be a lot easier if we could just eliminate all religion.

The problem here is this: IS is carrying out (or inspiring) these attacks in order to incite hate. They are hoping the weak-minded closet-racists will react without second-though against ALL Muslims, thus creating an ACTUAL reason for the moderate Muslims(there are a lot of them) to join the fight thus upsetting the balance and giving IS more power. The best way to fight back is to not fall for this BS that all Muslims are out to get you.

Here's the thing. It's absolutely the case that their plan is to provoke an escalating conflict with us, their cultural superiors, but it turns out this is a bad plan because Allah isn't going to intervene like they think and deliver them a victory in a fight they can't otherwise win.

If the enemy are superstitious retards then we should celebrate, because it makes them easier to kill. Smallpox has been eradicated, polio soon to follow, why shouldn't islam be next? Let the moderate muslims join the fight; let them be cut down for it.

So your are really saying not to show any media or such indicating fundamentalist radical ISIL / Muslim etc ?


That would be putting you head in the sand.

Hear no evil
See no evil


Wrong.

Point out the Bullies in the world and do something about it.
Meet the problem head on.

Only 1 religion is preforming mass murder throughout the world.

Moving this video to bobknight33's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Christianity?

I guess it comes down to why you label people the way you do. If you judge someone on his motivation, such as if someone kills another person because their religion tells them to, I guess I'd understand you'd labeling them as a "Religious Terrorist".
I think the reason you see people/media/politics avoid doing that, is because it's unfair to all the people of that religion who are otherwise exactly like you and I.