Hm, in the original video, the woman gets "harassed" by blacks and latinos but there weren't enough white guys flirting with her (thereby angering many people on the left).

Here, however, there's a multicultural and a multigender aspect to the people flirting with and teasing (i.e., "harassing") the drag queen. I wonder how the social justice warrior liberals are going to try to spin this...

Did you miss the part where I quoted trance saying she should wear earbuds?

Also please quote the part where I said "there should be stricter limits on their speech". For what seems like the 7 millionth time, freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences of speech. These guys are free to make comments on her ass or whatever, and I am free to call them misogynist assholes for doing so.

And this whole thing about class and race is a bullshit smokescreen, by men desperate to paint this as anything other than what it clearly is.

Here's Jessica Williams talking about being harassed by "wall street douches". So that's a black woman being harrassed by rich white guys.

Still think it's about how "dark skinned men might rape your white woman"?

Meanwhile, tranceidiot is desperately trying to somehow make this about his retarded libertarian agenda.

She seems like an actress engaged in some sort of self-promotion who would be well-served to check her white/cis/thin/heterosexual privilege and realize that People of Color can't harass her because harassment = talking + privilege, and they don't have privilege. Where are all the white guys in $1,000 suits?


And to call most of these pleasantries "harassment" seems to diminish real harassment.

And furthermore, I don't get it: How does someone donate money to end "street harassment?" What exactly does this charity do? Run around and put muzzles on street gawkers? Write citations to anyone who whistles? How do they plan to legislate against people saying "good morning" or "you're hot" to someone on the street?

At what point will 'white privilege' be considered over? How many years / decades / centuries must pass? How many affirmative action programs / laws must be enacted to consider all races/ women on equal footing?
When sentencing certain individuals in our Canadian courts here, judges here are required to take their ancestry into consideration.
Here in Canada, there's also a big move afoot for governments to apologize for historical injustices -- Japanese, Chinese, Sikhs, natives, Jews, etc.
My problem is that we are looking at history through a modern lens which is crazy. How far back are we going to go? 50 years? 100 years? A millennia? Should Christians today should apologize for the Crusades?
PS. Before somebody accuses me of a hidden agenda, I have no axe to grind. I am part native but don't make a big deal of it. I certainly don't look at a white guy and think, "Hey that guy owes ME something because of what his great-great-great-grandfather did."
I think Bill is right... at some point people have to stop leaning on laws and affirmative action movements as a crutch/excuse and get on with working things out for themselves.

Well, the Mexicans do come to the US to work. And more Americans are satisfied to be taken care of by the gov't, so...I can see Mexicans running things before long.

And we can get another white guy in the WH, as long as he's gay or transgender...cause if you criticize him, you'll be a homophobe or whatever the hell they call people who don't like transgenders.

It's not easy driving in America as a white guy who listens to NPR.

Nice one. It's what I would have expected, which is sad. The film could better drive home the point that this was from "one day". Even if he took that day off and just walked around for 12 hours, it's still sad.

But it is NYC, so I wonder how many shitty comments a non-dwarf white guy would get as a "control" to compare against. Probably not as many photos or height-related comments, but...

Sooooo... as a white guy am I allowed to laugh when one non-white guy mocks other non-white races/cultures? What's the rule here?

Yes, I am not entirely convinced by the term "reverse racism" either, but that's the one he used so I opted to let it stand.

Nonetheless, it's interesting how people can remain stuck on the label and miss the bigger point.
Yes "racism is racism", but that's not what he is talking about. Let's use a simple example: you're a white guy out in the street (of a western country, that is), minding your own business, when suddenly you are insulted by a black guy out of nowhere. He hates white folks. That guy is an evil racist, you got that right. He even snatches your wallet. You've been mugged by a racist. It sucks. It's an event in your life, but tomorrow will be another day.
Now let's compare that to being a black/colored/minority person: The police can stop, frisk, and detain you. Any day. You may be refused service at some restaurant. Any day. You may not be let in a club. Any day. You may not get that job. You may not get that apartment. If where you live really sucks, you may be in for a mugging or lynching on a seasonal basis. It won't happen all the time of course, but it will happen again and again, with a frequency and severity you will never be able to predict, and when it happens you will have no recourse. It's not 'an event', it defines you life. You expect it around every street corner.

So you and I can encounter a racist, but someone from a minority does experience racism (in other words, they've encountered so many racists in their life they've stopped counting: they talk about 'racism', not 'racists'). These are completely different things. There is simply no way you can actually live that level of oppression if you are not part of a minority.

And this is what he meant. He's not saying that there are no non-white racists, or no racists aiming at whites. He is saying there's no way you can experience actual real-scale racism, as it happens in society, if you yourself are part of the ethnic majority. Quite the difference.

TL;DR: racist != racism

I like this better than the original and I haven't even seen that one. Good show! The match ups were super-awkward! The lecherous old white guy with the black woman wins. Also, I want a hat that says "dope"

And they wonder why their median voting base is 70 year old white guys.

GTA5 skips the prison/ass rape part, which I hope is coming for this douchebag. I have to guess that he's dirt poor and has no assets to take to pay for all the damage he did, I hope they all had good insurance.
That white guy that kidnapped a 4 year old will likely be 'treated nicely' soon enough by his new roommates.

This guy is a legitimate GTA 5 player! I wonder if the helicopter is gonna run out of gas chasing him. Why is he running past all those easily hotwired cars?

(another thought) Wow the cops sure treated that white guy nicely.

Pretty fly for a white guy