Two more fun facts about Tapirs (and yes, these are scientifically accurate):
1) Tapirs can spray urine for several meters and are notorious for urinating on people.
2) Tapirs are usually quite docile, but have a viscous bite which can easily do enough damage to kill a human.

"I am the odor in your house when you come back from vacation.
I am the boogers that accumulate in your nose.
I am the white stuff that collects in the corner of your mouth.
I am the viscous discharge that stains your girlfriend's panties..."

Hmm, slow it down just a bit to make it just a bit more viscous-looking. What on earth could they be trying to evoke? OH! I know! SPERM! You see? They are trying to make the soy-milk look like SPERM! OMG! THIS VIDEO IS SO SUBTLE! SEE! Like my post! The girl just got JIZZED ALL OVER HER FACE! HAHAHA! OMG! SO WITTY!

not really.

still upvote.

I'm a guy.

@gwiz665 My point isn't that porn is bad and people who view it should feel bad about it. I really do have no issue with respectful porn in moderation. My issue is that if you do a search for porn these days, or go to youporn or anything like that, then 90% of the top stuff is just so derogatory towards women. Women gagging on dicks to the point of almost throwing up, women having their mouths pulled open, women drinking cum from glasses, bukakke, being held down and viscously rammed... this seems to be the norm now. The norm seems to be to treat women as objects. And damn those women better have big fake tits, a bald vagina, and be fine with ass to mouth.

My issue is that the porn is 'just there' now, and for single people, it'll get used a lot, and it DOES start shaping their tastes and expectations in regards to sex. The fact that sites like this even have a need to exist, shows that porn is shaping people's attitudes towards sex and women far more than it should be.

My wife and I do actually still occasionally watch porn together, carefully selected stuff that is not degrading, but just shows couples seemingly actually enjoying sex together. And as an occasional thing, it's great.

Trying to teach kids that porn is just movies and not real is just the same as movies really. Until their old enough to really process the difference between reality and make believe, until they get those critical thinking abilities, it doesn't matter how much you tell them that something isn't real. If they see it, it will affect them. So yes, I will definitely be teaching them about how the stuff in porn should never be looked on as a way to treat women (or be treated for my daughter), but I don't want them even seeing it until they're much older and can actually process it properly anyway.

Over sexualisation of our kids is a huge problem now. 3 year old girls being given high heel shoes for birthdays (as our daughter was, and we've promptly put them deep in the dress up basket), having 'role models' like Katy 'spit' Perry informing their self view. It's shit, and is not letting kids just be kids. And too many parents we see just go along with it. Let their 3 year olds dance and sing along to music videos showing women being treated as sex objects, and little more.

What this talk shows is that there is a physical effect of watching porn as much as people do now. You can put it down to weak will power, but when it's there at a click, whenever you want it, it's a problem. And it really is changing how people have sex. I've watched numerous talks where porn tropes like cumming on the woman's face, or ass to mouth, or any number of those things that only really make sense in the world of porn, are becoming things which men and women think are expected of them, or are the 'normal' way to have sex. That's a problem, because it's taking the focus away from two people getting hugely turned on and having great sex and being more like sex that looks good when being watched by someone else.

Yea. I was stupid and thought the "medicinal" ingredients was the fact is was viscous and coated the throat, not that it had Dextro or psudophedrine hydrochloride, both names I know off by heart now because of said incident. and I know what they do. because I had a rough time remembering to breath, that was the psudo.

Fun times growing up.

Breitbart and Liz Trotta need to hook up. I can almost hear the cathartic grunting and sobbing, their tears and bodily fluids combining into a pungent, viscous gruel.

The thing I hated the most in the lab was having to constantly deal with formaldehyde - a pretty potent carcinogen. It's used in tissue preservation, so anytime you want to extract some DNA/RNA from formalin fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) tissue you end up getting a dose of it.

The strangest thing is how in our chemistry labs all the waste chemicals from all our experiments had to be put into one big jar, so there would be this viscous, almost gooey mass of this silvery-orange-black'ish sort of toxic waste which was a combination of all the 30-40 different (already toxic) chemicals put together. That would then need to sit in the lab for a month until waste collection day arrived.

Bloody hell Hamilton is creepy. His emo laden wording of things, his near god worshipping of her, his bizarre looks towards her.

'Premier exotic dance establishments'? Really, you're going to try to make it sound classy? It's a strip club for fuck's sake.

When she's asked how much she'd been exposed to drugs prior to the whole bunker thing, and says, virtually nothing... 'just pot, meth and cocain'... in who's world is that virtually nothing?

[edit]

Wow, and the beginning of the accompanying article is such dribble:
"There is no facile synthesis of the events that transpired at the Wamego missile silo between October 1 and November 4, 2000. The available information is a viscous solution of truths, half-lies, three-quarter truths, and outright lies, the fractionation of which yields no pure product. "

I guess it depends on what type of round is needed. Kinetic rounds are meant to apply maximum force to the smallest possible surface area of a heavily armored target, usually composite armor where conventional rounds are ineffective. The sheer impact force alone and resultant heat and shrapnel, not to mention pressure wave that would likely suck any fleshy humanoids within (after turning them into a viscous red paste) right out the exit hole Alien Resurrection style, would probably do the trick.

Or so I vaguely recall being told from a friend with related experience 'blowing shit up' in an M1A1. I might be a bit off on the particulars. Or he might've been just 'making shit up'. >> ^Asmo:

I'd say the final round will need to be able to deliver the force to the target, so they'll want something that won't punch through, but transfer all of the force of it's arrival in to the target.

I am a vivacious viscous visionary when it comes to bringing the banslaught forward. I can be a general !

Indeed, check on murder rates for other countries and you get an interesting picture. Turns out, you can still commit murder without a gun. Or even suicide rates , self directed violence. Death by gun is a red herring in larger human condition of pain and misery. There are high levels of death and crime in many states that have complete gun control, which should come as no surprise. Turns out, humans are basically viscous apes, give him a stick or a gun and he will make an attempt to take what isn't his. I propose to ban pointy sticks, they have been a problem for much longer than guns.

The real question is why would you treat someone who has committed no crime against his fellow man as a criminal. It is the EXACT same question as the drug war. Sure the crack head MIGHT do something bad, but as long as he hasn't leave him the fuck alone.

*dupeof=me

See how I made it a *invocation joke, which has only been done here 475,000 times before? It's that 475,001st time that knocks 'em dead.

Okay, you can touch my wiener now. >> ^blankfist:

>> ^kronosposeidon:
It doesn't work for me, or any of my sockpuppets. Have you tried it with your sockpuppets? Maybe you'll have better luck than me.
Also, you're stupid. >> ^blankfist:
Also, anyone else having problems with the VideoSift embedable player? They won't post for me.


If by sockpuppet you're speaking about the time when you put that sock on your winkie and called it Captain Nimoy Ahoy, then, no, I have not tried it and I plan not to. Last time you told me if I gave him a couple smacks he'd vomit, but it felt more like something wet and viscous under the sock which was indeed NOT vomit, sir.
There. I made a joke about being duped into jerking you off. Who's stupid now?!

>> ^kronosposeidon:

It doesn't work for me, or any of my sockpuppets. Have you tried it with your sockpuppets? Maybe you'll have better luck than me.
Also, you're stupid. >> ^blankfist:
Also, anyone else having problems with the VideoSift embedable player? They won't post for me.



If by sockpuppet you're speaking about the time when you put that sock on your winkie and called it Captain Nimoy Ahoy, then, no, I have not tried it and I plan not to. Last time you told me if I gave him a couple smacks he'd vomit, but it felt more like something wet and viscous under the sock which was indeed NOT vomit, sir.

There. I made a joke about being duped into jerking you off. Who's stupid now?!

Tags for this video have been changed from 'corn syrup, colour, mix, rewind' to 'steve spangler, viscous, corn syrup, food coloring, mix, laminar flow, fluid dynamics' - edited by BoneRemake

>> ^BoneRemake:

"Euler's Disk" is a trademark for a product manufactured and distributed by the "Damert Company" (Toysmith Group), consisting of a metal disk, a base having an upwards-facing concave mirror, and holographic, patterned magnetic stickers. One or more magnetic stickers may be attached to the top surface of the disk. The disk, when spun on the mirror, exhibits a spinning/rolling motion. Euler’s Disk has an optimized aspect ratio and precision polished, rounded edges to maximize the spinning/rolling time. A coin spun on a table, or any disc spun on a relatively flat surface, exhibits essentially the same type of motion.
A spinning/rolling disk ultimately comes to rest; and it does so quite abruptly, the final stage of motion being accompanied by a whirring sound of rapidly increasing frequency. As the disk rolls, the point P of rolling contact describes a circle that oscillates with a constant angular velocity ω. If the motion is non-dissipative, ω is constant and the motion persists forever, contrary to observation (since ω is not constant in real life situations).
In the April 20, 2000 edition of Nature, Keith Moffatt shows that viscous dissipation in the thin layer of air between the disk and the table is sufficient to account for the observed abruptness of the settling process. He also showed that the motion concluded in a finite-time singularity.
Moffatt shows that, as time t approaches a particular time t0 (which is mathematically a constant of integration), the viscous dissipation approaches infinity. The singularity that this implies is not realized in practice because the vertical acceleration cannot exceed the acceleration due to gravity in magnitude. Moffatt goes on to show that the theory breaks down at a time τ before the final settling time t0, given by
\tau\simeq\left(2a/9g\right)^{3/5} \left(2\pi\mu a/M\right)^{1/5}
where a is the radius of the disk, g is the acceleration due to Earth's gravity, μ the dynamic viscosity of air, and M the mass of the disk. For the commercial toy (see link below), τ is about 10 − 2 seconds, at which \alpha\simeq 0.005 and the rolling angular velocity \Omega\simeq 500\rm Hz.
Using the above notation, the total spinning time is
t_0=\left(\frac{\alpha_0^3}{2\pi}\right)\frac{M}{\mu a}
where α0 is the initial inclination of the disk. Moffatt also showed that, if t0 − t > τ, the finite-time singularity in Ω is given by.....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler%27s_disk


Nerd.