search results matching tag: transmit

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (73)     Sift Talk (6)     Blogs (4)     Comments (230)   

Councilman Forgets to Turn His Mic Off

newtboy says...

You missed the sound of the old man peeing....flushing....then returning without ever using the sink.

Sad, because this issue IS important. These diseases are spreading throughout the world, are deadly, and are making our antibiotics useless. Most people can't even imagine a world without antibiotics, it could get ugly fast. I would bet that nearly every hospital in America is infected with some strain...that's where my mother in law caught one.

From recent experience, I can say these diseases are mostly easily transmitted, sneaky, destructive, expensive, and often deadly. Most people don't find out they have one until they have an adverse reaction to treatment for some other infection, that adverse reaction can be deadly organ failure, high fever (103+) respiratory distress, etc.... Normal treatment with antibiotics can make things exponentially worse! Many can be spread more easily than a cold, and are spreading rapidly worldwide.

bareboards2 said:

The curse of getting older -- I can't hear what made her get to giggling...

Megyn Kelly on Fox: "Some things do require Big Brother"

ChaosEngine says...

Do better, eh? No problemo.

China: Try reading the actual study (from your first link).

Conclusion:
A timely two-dose MMR vaccination schedule is recommended, with the first dose at 8 months and the second dose at 18–24 months. An MR vaccination speed-up campaign may be necessary for elder adolescents and young adults, particularly young females.

In other words, what's needed is more vaccination.

How Vaccines Harm Child Development: They don't.
First, the article is by Russell Blaylock, who believes "he former Soviet Union tried to spread collectivism by covertly introducing illegal drugs and various sexually transmitted diseases into the United States." He also hangs out with Alex Jones and Pat Robertson.
Second, almost everything in it is bullshit. He even falls back on the "vaccines cause autism" bollocks that was never true and had the idiot shill doctor that made it up stripped of his credentials.

Measles vaccines kill more people than measles, CDC data proves
Holy shit, that's terrible. Oh no, wait, it's a complete misrepresentation. No-one died from Measles, BECAUSE THEY WERE VACCINATED AGAINST IT.

Stop getting your medical information from quacks, liars and homeopaths.

Trancecoach said:

Why is China Having Measles Outbreaks When 99% Are Vaccinated?

How Vaccines Harm Child Development

Measles vaccines kill more people than measles, CDC data proves

You can do better.

Parents Talk to Their Kids About The Birds and the Bees

bareboards2 says...

True story.

Went to the presentation at school, at night. All the boys went one night, the girls on another. Fifth and sixth graders, but my mom took me as a fourth grader, my brother went as a fifth grader.

After both of us had seen the presentation, my parents sat with us in the backyard. Asked if we had any questions.

I had one. "How does the sperm get across the bed? Does it crawl?"

They showed all the apparatus, but they never told us the delivery method!

My parents didn't answer then. My dad tried to tell me later. Always at dinner time, which was weird.

I learned by then that this was something not to be discussed (picked that up from my parents, clearly!) Dad would try to tell me, I would squeal and run upstairs.

My father is not a patient man.

One night, he leaned over and unplugged the toaster. "Gale, in electrical terms, this is the male and this is the female." And he plugged in the toaster.

I squealed and ran, but the info was transmitted.

Stupid Disney movie didn't tell us.

This was in 1963.

How Wasteful Is U.S. Defense Spending?

scheherazade says...

The world isn't static.
For example, the J-20, between its stealth capabilities and its ability to jam radar, significantly lowers the range of our BVR radar guided missiles, because our radar guided missiles can't track them beyond a given range.
So you have to get closer - ideally without moving into range of the opponent's missiles.

A Super Hornet (which BTW is an ~entirely new plane compared to the original hornet. It's not an 'upgrade' to an existing airframe.) can't move in closer without exposing itself to fire.

Furthermore, the F35's ability to get closer than conventional fighters makes it 'take point' for information gathering and transmitting data over the network.

Yes, the F35 is has a wasteful inflated budget in large part architected to throw money at political friends - but the vehicle does exist to plug a real hole.

-scheherazade

Mordhaus said:

I'm sorry, but the planes we currently have in production are more than capable handling any role we need for conflicts. They even have future capability with tweaking, such as what was done to the super hornet. The F-35 is simply a freaking pork product that allows the current generals to have a nice job later with defense companies, congressmen the chance to give money to their states, etc. Drones are the future.

Triumphant first flight under FAA's new drone testing rules

Bill Moyers: The Long, Dark Shadows of Plutocracy

00Scud00 says...

From a technical standpoint I wonder if it would be possible to mount something on the roof of the building to re-transmit light over the park, or even built into the structure of the building itself?

The Antares rocket exploding at liftoff

WaterDweller says...

I don't know this for certain, but I think it so likely I'll just make a categorical statement: They have to push a button to transmit. There were probably quite a few literal fucks given before that button was pushed and orders relayed.

Ickster said:

I gotta say, I love how emotionless these guys always are. Rocket blows up; not a word is said about it other than "launch teams, be advised: stay at your stations."

Not even a single utterance like "Well, shit."

longde (Member Profile)

ChaosEngine says...

Happened across this while looking at avalanche videos

if you're interested,....

generally you wear a transceiver (sometimes called a beacon). Everyone wears one and it constantly transmits. If someone gets buried , the rescuers switch to search mode. Old transceivers just beeped faster as you got closer, but modern digital transceivers generally have a distance and direction readout. They're still only good for about 100 feet.

You have 15-20 mins to dig someone out before Bad Shit happens (oxygen depravation, etc). The digging itself takes most of the time, so finding them quickly is imperative. All of which assumes they haven't already died of trauma in the initial slide.

longde said:

I thought RFID or GPS tracers would have eliminated the guesswork in finding skiers.

The Man Who Turned Paper Into Pixels

U.S. Patent #1329559 A ~ Tesla's Valvular Conduit

bremnet says...

It's fluid dynamics, so for the purposes of the model that they CFD'd and the practical experiment, it doesn't matter whether it's air or water (they both can be treated as fluids), the outcome is the same... both have temperature dependent viscosity, are subject to frictional forces, and transmit forces through pressure etc. The principle of operation won't differ, but the efficiency may.

Drachen_Jager said:

This might work on air, because you can compress air, but I'm pretty certain it won't work on water.

Water is not a marble. It's not even millions of marbles, though that might better illustrate how it would move through the 'valve'. In reality the water is going up all those side channels AND the central 'smooth' channel all at once. The back eddies from the side channels will serve to help guide the water flowing up the main tube and if you can get ANY suction out of that sucker at all I'd be amazed.

Like I say, air is more complex. It might work there, but the efficiency would be so low I can't ever see this replacing a standard pump.

Reversing Arrow Optical Illusion

Payback says...

Your examples are flawed.

Place a rose-tinted glass in front of someone, and they would think you've placed a rose-tinted glass in front of them. The would expect the image transmitted by the glass to be rose-tinted as well.

Place a white sheet in front of them, and they would think you've placed a white sheet in front of them. They would expect to see a white sheet.

Place a clear object, such as a drinking glass, in front of them, they would think you've placed a drinking glass in front of them. They would expect to see through it, maybe expecting a perfect image, maybe a distorted one.

Fill that glass with water, and they do NOT expect to see a reversed image. It's an illusion. The arrows are not faced right, they are faced left, but they SEEM to be facing right.

By your yardstick, a mirage, the most common form of illusion, isn't.

MichaelL said:

From Wikipedia:
An optical illusion (also called a visual illusion) is characterized by visually perceived images that differ from objective reality.

That means when you stare at an object DIRECTLY, you are tricked into believing that it has different qualities than it does.

In this example, you aren't starting at the arrows... you are staring at a diffracted image of the arrows. The diffracted arrows REALLY do point in the opposite direction. There's no illusion here.

Consider this...

If I put a rose-tinted pane of glass in front of the arrows, would you consider that an optical illusion?

Would you think "Hey, those arrows were on white paper before, NOW the paper is pink! Mind blown! Optical illusion!'?

No, you understand that you are seeing the colour pink because that's the property of the pane of glass IN FRONT OF the white sheet.

If you put a white sheet in front of the arrows, would you think: "Hey, the arrows have disappeared? Optical illusion!"?

No, that's the property of the sheet in front of the arrows.

And so on...

Hopefully, that clarifies it for you...

5 Holiday Lies You Believe

Lawdeedaw says...

So when you don't wear proper protection heat escapes most from that area. Yes, which means most of it escapes through people's heads (Because fewer people wear hats than pants) and therefore it isn't a myth (Although I knew this answer before watching the video anyways.)

Like how if everyone always wore condoms and had a lot of oral sex it would be likely that most sexually transmitted diseases would be spread how? But by his point it would be false and silly to warn people...

Not For Astronauts...

rich_magnet says...

But selenites would develop acute sensitivity to acoustic vibrations transmitted through the regolith. Good luck bunny hopping back to the safety of you lander, Lander Calrissian.

How the Moon Rotates Around Earth

shinyblurry says...

Human behavior is primitive, but the bible outlines exactly how a man should live to be at peace with God, the world and himself. There is nothing primitive about that, and in fact, if everyone followed what the bible said there would be peace on Earth today. The knowledge transmitted by Jesus Christ is not primitive compared to modern understanding, it is transcendent of modern understanding. Western civilization owes quite a bit to the bible:

http://www.amazon.com/Book-that-Made-Your-World/dp/1595553223

The bible is concerned with Earth because this is the planet God created for us to live. As far as the rest of the Universe goes, we're on a need to know basis.

Mammaltron said:

"The skies" make up >99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999999% of everything there is, but the Bible contains only (primitive) human knowledge. Why is that?

Pat Robertson wants this video deleted from the internet

shatterdrose says...

It's sad that people actually believe this shit. Holy fucking batman that's scary . . . that people can be this retarded by religion to believe this nonsense. The very fact he says it "maybe" transmitted by sexual contact just shows how far in the hole his head is, and to say "we used to think" about Grids (the old name for AIDS) is a further example of the blind stupidity religion can cause. We "used" to not think ANYTHING about AIDS because it was a "gay disease only affecting gay people". So it was *this* close to being illegal to research a cure. They quite literally just left sufferers to die of their "sin" until they finally caught on that AIDS was actually affecting straight Christians (the same people they just pronounced dead due to homosexual conduct.) Only then did they care to find a cure. Love thy fucking neighbor my ass. More like Love Thyself and give everyone not like me the middle finger and hope they die.
/rant



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon