I often go to nursing homes, hospices and peoples homes to do body removals. One thing that always tugs at my heart is to see the deceased with nearly freshly painted fingernails and toenails.

I look at the end of this video with this woman wearing handcuffs and I see her red fingernails and wonder who painted them for her.

According to gizmodo, almost immediately after the ad was released people had changed the page to include ingredients such as cyanide, toenail clippings, and "medium sized child".

*ban
How to Get Rid of Toenail Fungus
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EnCJqRNczb4

He might THINK he's won...

...until the next day he wakes up from his nap on the couch, looks in the mirror and sees the Magic Marker mascara and crimson toenail polish lipstick.

The simple thing every one overlooks is that he has had hair, fingernails, and toenails since the beginning. Obviously at some point the material 'dies' and is then able to be shaved or cut or he would have long hair and funky long nails.

*quality for Nye though.

I find her repugnant and not because she's a woman...

A bit more info on the case:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/oct/09/speaker-australia-parliament-resign-text-message

Gillard has consistently used personal attacks (some of the certainly accurate) against Abbott to deflect attention away from her governments ongoing snafu's.

The slipper case is just the latest gigantic fuck up in a long line with Gillard's name all over it. This wonderfully outraged woman has steadfastly refused to fire the speaker knowing it would deprive her of another vote in an already slim minority government. The same guy that would say things like:

"Look at a bottle of mussel meat! Salty Cunts in brine!" he continued in his text message to former staffer James Ashby. "Been to thw (sic) fish shop yet to buy the bottle of shell less mussells (sic)?"

I'll be the first to admit that Abbott is neither a likeable person or good prime minister material, but with no viable third alternative, I'll take him and his misogyny over Roxon's 1984-esque data retention scheme and continual attempts to increase the states right at the expense of the citizens, Conroy's 'see no evil' compulsory internet filtering and the extension of the confounding NT 'intervention' scheme that continues to pump money in to a bottomless pit but doesn't actually result in better lives for the Australian Aboriginals it's supposed to help...

Gillard's character is plainly on display. She ignores the blatant sexism of the man she, and her AG Nicola Roxon, defended and refuse to hang out to dry, but when he is revealed to be exactly what she despises, she invokes her dead father and plays the "they're picking on me cos I'm a woman" card to try and divert attention from the trainwreck that is her government. She's not even a toenail clipping from Maggie Thatcher who took to the game of politics as if men had never owned it, never hiding behind the fact she was a woman.

I'd say this is a pretty good indication that you need to clip your toenails.

Wonder how he trim his toenails...

@Ryjkyj

I appreciate your sincere reply, and do not want you to take my comments as personal attacks; it is the fact that such a practice can be so widely accepted despite having no, and I repeat my claim, no ethical nor medical basis, that really angers me. As for "age of consent", I am talking about informed consent, which I imagine you gave/had when you first had sex. A baby/child cannot give such consent (whether an adolescent under community/family pressure can is another question).

You say: "Saying that circumcision is akin to cutting off toes is ridiculous." Au contraire, it is actually quite a good analogy if one implies the little toes; they are not primordial (but do help balance), and without them you can be sure of never getting ingrown toenails on said toes. One cannot have phimosis (a rare and almost always benign ailment) without a foreskin, ergo the analogy is applicable. I've got one with earlobes if you prefer...

Nowhere did I suggest FGM and circumcision are alike, and I never would. They are comparable, though, inasmuch as they are both cultural traditions from barbaric times, upheld by religious beliefs.

The pain factor is a red herring, to distract from the real ethical problem: tampering with someone's body, irretrievably, without their consent. In Africa, some tribes still scar their babies' faces to mark their belonging; would it be okay if done medically and under anesthesia? "I'll tell them, 'some people are scarred, some not', no biggy"?



@asynchronice

Look up "mutilation" in the dictionary; no sensationalism whatsoever. Maybe it seems that way because most of society is completely desensitized to the disgusting and unethical practice that is infantile circumcision.

Circumcision is like sex change in two ways:

1) It should be an adult's personal decision (to do it to themselves, of course).
2) It should NOT be done to kids.



"If you are arguing outside of the aesthetics or practicality, I don't have time for you."

I guess you don't give a shit about ethics and human rights then. Well fuck you.

>> ^Ryjkyj:

>> ^hpqp:
@apologists: you have NO ethical nor medical arguments on your side

Pfft...
It seems your opinion was considered very popular back in 1971. I had no idea.
http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/118/1/385.full


Did you read the part about cultural bias? The article you linked starts off promisingly:

"The American public remains resolute in its support of newborn circumcision despite negative recommendations from the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP)." Oh, so if the majority wants it...

The writer of the article: Edgar Schoen, Jew, maintainer of medicirc.org and member of the "Hill of Foreskins" society (Gilgal society). Noooo bias whatsoever there.


As for the actual "medical benefits" of circumcision, give me a f*cking break. "Prevents phimosis"? That's exactly like saying removing your toes prevents ingrown toenails. Phimosis is not only rare, but usually easily cured, as are most cases of UTI (btw, all the other fancy names that follow phimosis in the article are variations of the same thing). No need for mutilating your baby.


The most horrible and aberrant argument is the one concerning STDs and HIV... seriously, wtf?

Kids should not be having sex before the age of consent*; argument null!

(*that includes not being sucked off by some herpes-infested mohel.)



After that, it comes down to three things: hygiene, condoms and choice. Personal choice, not parental or communal pressure.

If it's all about prevention (a big effing lie), why not take out their tonsils? Or appendix? Or cut off the earlobes? Why not sterilize anyone who already has HIV? See where this goes?

PINK TOENAILS!!!??!?!?!?!???? OMG! He's got THE GAY!

Rule # 37: I don't need a conversation. We aren't friends. You are effectively an extention of my hygene like clipping my toenails.

I always hate this portrayal of "The Guys"

It always seems to generalize all guys as some form of douchie Zapp Brannigan, about as interesting as a toenail clipping, and generally about as intelligent.

I can't speak for everyone, But I personally have never sat around with my friends doing dick all and being as obnoxious as possible. If I had a group of friends over and all we did was sit around insulting each other, I'd basically reconsider my friendship with those people.

>> ^Lann:
I find I'm a combination of...26, 28, 29, 33, 37, 40, 61, 83, and 88


So, you one a them big-eyed, crazy, dirty-fingernail havin', same clothes everyday wearin', flappy shoed, tall-ass tom boy, dickridin' and be ignoring you when they know you can hear them kinna bitches, huh??

Sounds sexy as fuck!! You one a them hairy-legged, no-pit-shavin', belly-button stinkin', scraggly-toenailed bitches too???

Here's my number-7134692384

> It would be cool if we could put self replicating bacteria in our gas tanks.

> They would have to have something to feed on though


whiskers and toenails