search results matching tag: naughty

» channel: learn

go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds

    Videos (143)     Sift Talk (5)     Blogs (8)     Comments (368)   

Gay McDonald's ad in France

Stormsinger says...

>> ^blankfist:

@Stormsinger. Whether or not a corporate commercial plays in a country has little to do with a its level of freedom, but more about social attitudes toward its subject matter, I'd conclude.
Though, if you want to talk about who controls what can be broadcasted in this "free" country, the FCC is the government organization that regulates that and keeps the naughty impurities from our tvs.


Oh I'm fully aware of the legal "keeper of the innocence". And I admit to stretching the popular definition of freedom a bit. But I have to say that I consider freedom to be more than just the legal environment...social attitudes and restrictions are definitely part of that nebulous term, as far as I'm concerned. Especially when they act as censors on what is allowed to be aired by the media. Frankly, the FCC is unlikely to make waves about this type of commercial...but we're still too socially backwards to let a company show it, no matter how amusing it is.

Gay McDonald's ad in France

blankfist says...

@Stormsinger. Whether or not a corporate commercial plays in a country has little to do with a its level of freedom, but more about social attitudes toward its subject matter, I'd conclude.

Though, if you want to talk about who controls what can be broadcasted in this "free" country, the FCC is the government organization that regulates that and keeps the naughty impurities from our tvs.

Sniper Kills in Thailand Protests

NordlichReiter says...

http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=f44_1271214688


From SOURCE: "I don't know anything about this video other than my wife's relatives sent it to us. The footage shows a red shirt having his head blown off in what looks like a completely unprovoked attack. Now I'm no forensic scientist, but what occurs doesn't look like the work of a rubber b More..ullet, more like a point blank shotgun round being ploughed through the guy's skull.

I'm not uploading this with any political motivation; I am actually having a hard time trying to understand where the truth lies in all that is going on, mostly due to the conflicting media reports. I am neither red nor yellow, I am simply interested in current events such as this.

Red shirt or yellow, I care not. All I do see though is a poor bastard get his head blown off and some very naughty police work. "


Rubber sabots are not to be shot at someone's head, as it will cause this. The moment the first person was killed, the situation went from protest to war. It has been proven time and again that head shots and center mass shots can be fatal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-lethal_weapon#Ammunition

http://www.patfinucanecentre.org/policing/plastic/plastic23072001b.html

Creationism in the Classroom

Xaielao says...

That video kinda reminds me of one I saw a few years back of a young teen telling his mother something like 'I don't believe in god' and she got so pissed she screamed at him 'You don't believe in god? Well you're not getting any christmas presents from santa this year!' which of course made me almost fall out of my chair I laughed so hard. You don't believe in god? Well that puts you on santa's naughty list cause.. as you know, maybe god isn't real but santa so totally is!

kronosposeidon (Member Profile)

rottenseed says...

That is weird that my comment was "banned". I always assumed that was the one that was banned.

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Then why doesn't blankfist have a 'Comments Banned' stat? Check it out. Even westy doesn't have one, and he has the worst rated comment of all time. However I also checked out CaptainPlanet420's profile, and he has 15 banned comments. So you're in good company, I guess.



In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
Actually blankfist "started it", and mine was the second to be raped...stupid sloppy seconds
http://videosift.com/video/kp-dared-me-to-post-this#comment-349483

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Ha, I was just checking your profile when I noticed the stat "Comments Banned: 1". WTF is that all about?

[E]: I just checked choggie's and quantumushroom's profiles, and even they don't have any banned comments. You must have been a VERY naughty boy. What did you say? That Steve Jobs is secretly spreading AIDS throughout the planet with the iPad?

rottenseed (Member Profile)

kronosposeidon says...

Then why doesn't blankfist have a 'Comments Banned' stat? Check it out. Even westy doesn't have one, and he has the worst rated comment of all time. However I also checked out CaptainPlanet420's profile, and he has 15 banned comments. So you're in good company, I guess.



In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
Actually blankfist "started it", and mine was the second to be raped...stupid sloppy seconds
http://videosift.com/video/kp-dared-me-to-post-this#comment-349483

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Ha, I was just checking your profile when I noticed the stat "Comments Banned: 1". WTF is that all about?

[E]: I just checked choggie's and quantumushroom's profiles, and even they don't have any banned comments. You must have been a VERY naughty boy. What did you say? That Steve Jobs is secretly spreading AIDS throughout the planet with the iPad?

kronosposeidon (Member Profile)

rottenseed says...

Actually blankfist "started it", and mine was the second to be raped...stupid sloppy seconds
http://videosift.com/video/kp-dared-me-to-post-this#comment-349483

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Ha, I was just checking your profile when I noticed the stat "Comments Banned: 1". WTF is that all about?

[E]: I just checked choggie's and quantumushroom's profiles, and even they don't have any banned comments. You must have been a VERY naughty boy. What did you say? That Steve Jobs is secretly spreading AIDS throughout the planet with the iPad?

kronosposeidon (Member Profile)

rottenseed says...

There was a thread going around where it was "upvote every comment". I happily switched the role and called for a "downvote every comment". Mine was the first to be subject to the comment rape...even when my comments are banned they are awesome.

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
Ha, I was just checking your profile when I noticed the stat "Comments Banned: 1". WTF is that all about?

[E]: I just checked choggie's and quantumushroom's profiles, and even they don't have any banned comments. You must have been a VERY naughty boy. What did you say? That Steve Jobs is secretly spreading AIDS throughout the planet with the iPad?

rottenseed (Member Profile)

kronosposeidon says...

Ha, I was just checking your profile when I noticed the stat "Comments Banned: 1". WTF is that all about?

[E]: I just checked choggie's and quantumushroom's profiles, and even they don't have any banned comments. You must have been a VERY naughty boy. What did you say? That Steve Jobs is secretly spreading AIDS throughout the planet with the iPad?

Asphyxia Bodypaint

Another New Nike Tiger Ad

Do we really need a channel devoted to what is essentially a movie inside joke? (User Poll by reiwan)

Jacques Magazine presents Tori

Shepppard says...

This isn't art imo.

THIS is art

This video is of a chick posing for getting her picture taken for guys to fap to in a naughty magazine, the intent is purely for sexual eroticism, the fact that it's in black and white with a soundtrack really doesn't mean anything as sarzy said.

The video isn't of her posing to show off the beauty and softness of the female form. She's sitting in a car fondling herself because it's going to get guys off somewhere. I won't downvote this, but I don't think this belongs here, this pushes the bounds of the new guidelines.

Jacques Magazine presents Tori

Shepppard says...

I'm with ponce, after a quick google on Jacques Magazine I came up with some interesting finds.

Now, the new "Definition" is " "Explicit sexual content" is defined on VideoSift as gratuitous nudity of a sexual nature lacking any reasonable artistic and educational merit, implying its sole intent is to cause sexual arousal. "

The entire purpose of the magazine however, is to be artfully sexual. It's playboy.. but a high class playboy.
"Where the good get naughty, and the Naughty get Naked"

Now, before I go any further, this is definitely *Viral

Now, onto this EXACT issue, Cover, "A red light says "Stop": this redhead's eyes undoubtedly say "Go": so just what message do her sexy stockings and garter give?

On the (something) theigh of this volumptuous vixen, these innovative intimates from agent Provocateur serve as both an incitation and a challenge."
(or, that's what I can make out, the text is stupidly small and difficult to read)

Anyway.. Wheres it has artistic merit to it.. it's still for an adult magazine. This.. may have to be discussed.

JesseoftheNorth (Member Profile)



Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Beggar's Canyon