and the version WITH the naughty bits is where?

I ask purely for a scientific basis.

http://videosift.com/video/SFW-entire-XXX-Star-Trek-parody-scrubbed-of-naughty-bits

Hey, here is the whole movie -- scrubbed.

I am 38, married with 4 kids. I still dry hump the center console while making out with my wife in the driveway after a date night. Am I ashamed? Hell no! 16 or 38 it is all the same. I don't see it changing any time soon. Hell, I still get work boners just sitting in front of a computer looking at SQL databases and remembering naughty wife time. The difference now is that the teacher won't make me stand up and do a math problem on the board.

Fixed, thanks!>> ^Uncle_Vinnie:

It is Nijmegen not Nijmegan

woe woe is I, I lost my pants.


**_** UPDATE : at 2:00 pm I found my pants, wrapped in my apron, as it was a buffer between my hot hot soup and my sensitive sensitive naughty bits. **_**

Hah. I'd see that.

Anne Hathaway is naughty in a respectful, wholesome way... Mmm... wholesome *drools*

I want to stick my naughty parts in your stink hole

>> ^BicycleRepairMan:
Bon Bon is actually a candy brand that specializes on "disgusting" candy ie: good tasting candy with bad or naughty names. "Giant boobs" is one, "Dogfarts" another
I guess they also made a theme park out of it now..


Don't forget "Piss Ants". My personal favorite.

His intention was good but it's rather unprofessional to leave in midst of an interview. Just sayin'.

It's sorta like capturing a window spider and releasing it outside in midst of a job interview or saying hello to his friend while he's at the principal's office. Do remember that he just came out of a police station fighting extradition facing a rape charge in Sweden. (which is another debating case of immaturity of him and people he mingles with)

It just goes to show his attitude towards all this media attention, that he's not taking things very seriously, not much different from a love-starved kid getting attention by being naughty.

What he's doing with wikileaks has made headlines, fighting against the tyrannies of corporate controlled and concentration of power. That's good. But he's also a man that does not care much for conventional rules, and he'd rather play this role of vigilante and in fact loving every minute of it. He's just as immature and selfish as any one of those crooks he is ought to expose them.

He likes the fact that he can play outside the boundaries, that he is above the law. In fact that's what his work is about, by means of backhand deals and illegal information leaks. But he's doing these bad things to the bad guys, which is the major difference and why some people view him as a hero. So his existence is in itself a constant clash of irony, a people's hero out to fight against world's problems, by practicing the same techniques the baddies are using, and enjoying his role in it.

>> ^EDD:

>> ^alien_concept:
Children gang raping adults?

I know what it is you really want, you kinky perv:
>> ^alien_concept:
Taylor Lautner has my permission to do dirty naughty things to me, I don't care if he's only 12 or whatever!



Have you got a photographic memory or something?? I can't deny it though, you've got my number. Comments like that, a teen channel, job as a youth worker?? Call the fuckin cops!!!

>> ^alien_concept:

Children gang raping adults?


I know what it is you really want, you kinky perv:

>> ^alien_concept:

Taylor Lautner has my permission to do dirty naughty things to me, I don't care if he's only 12 or whatever!

Yeah... kinda kills the 'point' of it if they just beep out that oh so naughty word.

>> ^Drachen_Jager:

The sad part of all this.
Even the "intelligent" voters in the United States are absolute idiots when it comes to understanding things like financial policy.
Probably not because they're stupid people but because the media fails so miserably at informing the public. Why don't Americans care more about the different economic philosophies (if you can call "Give rich people like ME more money!" a philosophy) espoused by their politicians than they do about which celebretard is going to jail or caught on tape saying naughty things this week. Lindsay Lohan's troubles will NEVER directly impact your lives people!


You can't blame the media for the public's inability to read or know vocabulary, especially when People magazine outsells U.S. News and World Report.

The sad part of all this.

Even the "intelligent" voters in the United States are absolute idiots when it comes to understanding things like financial policy.

Probably not because they're stupid people but because the media fails so miserably at informing the public. Why don't Americans care more about the different economic philosophies (if you can call "Give rich people like ME more money!" a philosophy) espoused by their politicians than they do about which celebretard is going to jail or caught on tape saying naughty things this week. Lindsay Lohan's troubles will NEVER directly impact your lives people!

>> ^HollywoodBob:

>> ^spoco2:
The point is that product makers should label what's in their cleaners so you can chose to not to use ones with certain chemicals in them.

Yeah because we all know which chemicals (and chemical combinations) can have adverse effects on us. Yeah we could all use the internet to investigate which chemicals could be harmful, but really if we're going to do that isn't it just as easy to figure out which products could be harmful the same way? Plus I think it would be easier to remember that "Shiny Suds" might be harmful than to try and remember if "polyethylmethalenedimonochlorohydroxipentathyaletamine glycol" might be harmful.
Better suggestion would be for consumers to stop buying cleaning products all together. Salt, vinegar, and elbow grease will clean your bathroom far better and you won't have to worry about any harmful chemicals.


Agreed.