im not seeing the naughty bits, where are they?

This is so laden with sexual energy...

Naughty co-eds dancing on tables
Put your head inside... 'ha ha ha' (Asphyxiation sex)
Pervy teacher explains how to hold his long suction pole.
'Must' be between her legs, Cup the end of it...
Be careful or it will suck onto your body or maybe rip your clothes off.
She'll have to walk around school in semi translucent plastic.
She screams and giggles as it's turned on
Vacuum packed so she looks like shes wrapped naked in cling film



>> ^zeoverlord:

True, also rule 34 still applies

Doctor.

I am going to harvest some of the bambo peices from the window covering and make a scaffolding for my off center aloe plant, its going to snap its base as it is growing at a 60 degree angle from its base. I just need some wire from a hobby shop like "Michaels" thin thin wire.. Or lurn me some Thatching skills. Should look great when I am done.

Been working at West Edmonton mall the past week, I like it because of the view when on break and outside the work area, Lots and I mean LOTS of sexy sexy girls. Nummy nummy I got naughty thoughts near my tummy.

have a good weekend

- me

Honkeytonk, master of the single entendre

>> ^honkeytonk73:

LOL you can go from mouth to vag without skipping a beat.
>> ^jimnms:
It's a good think you can't see what I'm thinking while watching this video. That kiss of the spider woman pose makes me have naughty thoughts.



>> ^Lann:

^ That's what jimnms was getting at without actually having to say anything...slick.

LOL you can go from mouth to vag without skipping a beat.

>> ^jimnms:

It's a good think you can't see what I'm thinking while watching this video. That kiss of the spider woman pose makes me have naughty thoughts.

It's a good think you can't see what I'm thinking while watching this video. That kiss of the spider woman pose makes me have naughty thoughts.

Ah there was a version already on here. This one is the most famous from the movie "The Naughty Nineties".
>> ^berticus:

http://videosift.com/video/Abbott-and-Costellos-Whos-on-First-Routine

No idea if I can second the *isdupe as it's my submission, but I'm sure siftbot will tell me off if I'm being naughty.

Hey numbnuts, I didn't see the girls underpants...maybe I wasn't looking as hard as you were.

what if he was zooming in on her armpits rather than her crotch (which was covered by two layers of clothing. maybe he has a wicked underarm fetish...still objectionable?

fact is he did zoom for a few moments on her ass, he also spent alot of the video filming her from different angles that wouldnt be considered "pervy" as well as turning around and filming the skyline behind him.

and what about all the people standing by and watching from his general direction reletive to her? are they pervs because they were having a crotch pointed at them? nope...but if you film it, its naughty time.

>> ^residue:

het numbnuts, I'm pretty sure the cameraman isn't zooming in on her fucking underpants. you can't honestly tell me you don't see a difference between the two
>> ^CyberViperDriver:
its this sickening trend in america now where the line was apparently crossed by him using a camera. ((hint, now the police are jumping on the bandwagon, arresting people filming arrests from their own private property))
"He is filming her! HERPA DERP CHILD PRON!"
gimme a fucking break. so assuming he is shady and was going to take the footage back home and masturbate furiously to it...he could do the same with just his memory of the girl...better just burn him at the stake to be sure he isn't getting away with anything pervy.
oh, the dude on the ground taking pictures? we paid him so its cool that he is snapping pictures, but god help him he happens to drop the shutter when she turns the wrong way....oh wait, we wont do anything even then because we are hypocrites.
The ultimate irony would be the pro photographer taking the shots home and masturbating furiously to them.

>> ^sme4r:

Me @ 45 secs "What!!? He doesnt get knoc..."
Me @ 46 secs "YESSSSSSsssssssssssssssss"


Hahaha! That was the exact same reaction I had.

Man that last 0.5 seconds is a pisser. I love the way the guy shakes his finger at him and puts his hands on his hips like "Naughty, naughty"

I think our main disagreement is really about what religion is, ie how to define it, And I'm struggling to get my view across. Are you familiar with the expression/story "Nail soup" Its a common folk-tale from I think sweden, and it concerns a homeless man/wanderer and a woman. Basically, the wanderer is looking for food and a place to sleep, and he convinces the woman to give him a place to sleep, but she says she doesnt have any food. But then the guy explains that he can cook world class soup on nothing but a rusty old nail. Naturally, the woman is skeptical, but agrees to let the man try, so he boils up some water and tosses the nail in. "Its really getting tasty now, he says, and if only.. well, I shouldnt say.." "No, go on", says the woman, now getting interested "Well.." he says "..its just that a pinch of salt would really do the trick, but its not strictly needed" so the woman gives him some salt, and then he keeps talking, and eventually they put in pepper, carrots, mushrooms, some leftover meat, and so on,(none of them actually needed, he explains) and it ends up being a really good soup, and the woman, of course, having been completely duped, breaks out the finest brew to go with it and impressedly exclaims "And all that on a nail!, Amazing!"

I think religion is a bit like that nail. If you take an average Christian, lets say, their lives, their morality, their views on sexuality, human rights, equality,community, world affair and whatnot is almost entirely free of influence from anything in the bible, but they will nevertheless THINK they've been informed by the bible and their religion, just like the woman who think shes eating soup cooked on nothing but a nail. But of course, its not the nail that makes the soup great. In fact, it would probably be better without it, and yet the nail gets all the credit. Thats how I view religion. Like a rusty nail, it really has nothing to offer in the "soup of wisdom", we have vastly superior methods of gathering information and making judgements about the world. To the degree that religion CAN influence your decision-making process, it would have to, by definition, be something unique to the respective religion. And whats unique about a 2-4000 year old attempt at philosophy? Well, for starters we know that the people who wrote it knew next to nothing about the world they lived in. They were primitive, frightened, superstitious peasants who thought the gods would punish them for being naughty in bed, who thought the creator of the universe cared which kind of bipedal ape should live in Israel, and that they had to cut of their foreskins to prove that they were from the right tribe.

This is not a good source of wisdom, and if you REALLY base your morality or actions upon this earliest and worst attempt at philosophy, you could just as well feed your family on nothing but nails.

EDIT 24.08.10:
So what I'm really saying is that i honestly dont think religion has any good to offer. And even if it does( as with certain quotes by jesus, certain aspects of Buddhism and so on) I , as an atheist, have no trouble just stealing those good ideas, not because they are or are not part of a religion, but because they are good ideas. I dont need to think Jesus is the son of God anymore than i have to think Einstein was the son of God to think that their ideas are brilliant. So whats left of religion? well its the empty shell of superstitious, unverifiable,highly improbable noise that we call dogma, and thats the part that go haywire, because it makes ridiculous and untrue claims about the world, and that makes people make bad decisions . If you really think, say that the "prophet" Muhammed had personal contact with the creator of the universe, as is the assumed belief of all proper muslims, what room is there realistically left for doubt and interpretation? why should you then be critical of any of the actions or claims that the prophet has made? This is precisely whats wrong with religion, it places an invisible barrier between certain claims and our duty to be critical and skeptical towards them, some religions more than others, and some forms of religion more than others, but basically thats what it does. By calling texts and scripture "holy", criticism is forbidden either directly and by force by some ruling authority, or, more commonly, but just as disturbingly, by people engaging in self-censorship of their mind, a kind of thoughtcrime mindset.

Naughty!!! Baughty!!! Haughty!!! Shaughty!!! But mainly - Naughty!!!

*nsfw for naughty language. Also *dark.

Siftbot, you're a naughty robot.

Honey, the audience came here for a slimy, voyeristic peek into the most traumatic moments of your life, not to be offended by naughty words... and could you cry a bit please