I was going to comment on the description, but then I saw the video... yeah, she did that on purpose. Naughty girl!

"You're so naughty!"

"...I dunno, I'm kinda middle of the road"

=upvote

This kitty reminds me so much of my little cat Nunny. She was about the same size, similar marks, the same meow, and the naughty look in her eye. I lost her to cancer last Dec and I still miss her terribly. This video was hard to watch but made me laugh too.

You may also notice the tall gold buildings in the background which is Oral Roberts University. Having grown up just a few miles from there I can tell you that there are a ton of crazies like her, but it's not all bad; some of the best parties I've ever been to were thrown by ORU students.

There's just something about kids that were raised in uber religious families and going away to another stifling institution that turns them into party animals taking every chance they get to do something naughty.

Man I miss those parties.

Thank fuck we've got you to mother hen us all to death with your constant pecking.

>> ^bareboards2:

Hey! Don't blame yourself for posting that video!
There was nothing racist about that video -- it was a group of assholes breaking the law. It was interesting information about life in the big city -- and a scary reminder of the shadow side of instant technology.
It only became racist when someone made it so.
After all, Tailhook was all white men of privilege. The riots in Vancouver after the Stanley Cup were white men. Nobody looked at those incidents and said.... what? What is the white equivalent to "nigger"?
The rest of your comment? Right on, brother, right on. (Except I think we should be able to ban folks -- the threat of banishment is the only thing that works with some personalities. Because, unfortunately, this is still kindergarten in a lot of ways. It's the anonymous nature of the interwebs, I think -- brings out the naughty kid in some folks.)

>> ^MrFisk:
I blame myself for posting the video.
The comment was despicable but shouldn't have merited banishment. Especially for someone who has been a member for so long.
I also blame blankfist for teaching us how to ban people - i.e., choggie. Because blankfist wants to be the biggest asshole on the sift, and because choggie was a bigger asshole, blankfist banned him. It's rather ironic.
Let's just stop banning people. Donwvote videos and comments you dislike. Upvote videos and comments you enjoy.
After all, this isn't kindergarten.

Hey! Don't blame yourself for posting that video!

There was nothing racist about that video -- it was a group of assholes breaking the law. It was interesting information about life in the big city -- and a scary reminder of the shadow side of instant technology.

It only became racist when someone made it so.

After all, Tailhook was all white men of privilege. The riots in Vancouver after the Stanley Cup were white men. Nobody looked at those incidents and said.... what? What is the white equivalent to "nigger"?

The rest of your comment? Right on, brother, right on. (Except I think we should be able to ban folks -- the threat of banishment is the only thing that works with some personalities. Because, unfortunately, this is still kindergarten in a lot of ways. It's the anonymous nature of the interwebs, I think -- brings out the naughty kid in some folks.)



>> ^MrFisk:

I blame myself for posting the video.
The comment was despicable but shouldn't have merited banishment. Especially for someone who has been a member for so long.
I also blame blankfist for teaching us how to ban people - i.e., choggie. Because blankfist wants to be the biggest asshole on the sift, and because choggie was a bigger asshole, blankfist banned him. It's rather ironic.
Let's just stop banning people. Donwvote videos and comments you dislike. Upvote videos and comments you enjoy.
After all, this isn't kindergarten.

This is like those Begat bible verses:

1. A group of admirers of Jefferson decide to celebrate his birthday at midnight, when tourist traffic is low, by "dancing" with iPods plugged into their ears. The original facebook page invitation, slightly edited:
"It's a secret birthday/dance party thrown by a group of flashmobbing libertarians. Tell friends about it if they are 1. Awesome. 2. Can keep their mouth shut 3. libertarians

Sweet dance moves wouldn't hurt either.

It works best if we all listen to the same song (nominate on the wall) but since libertarians are "free to choose" come prepared to listen to whatever makes you happy."

Seems to me it was a sweet idea to honor someone they admired, knowing it probably wasn't okay (secret, going at midnight, they knew they were being naughty, but no big whoop.) No disrespect intended.

2. Disrespect, however, was perceived by others. The video shows a party-like atmosphere, which attracted attention enough for the partiers to be asked to leave.

3. Being asked to leave was perceived as being disrespectful to the rights of the partiers.

4. Not leaving (the woman who was arrested, not the guy filming, who left) was perceived as disrespectful.

5. Being arrested was perceived as disrespectful.

6. Which led to a series of other events, all of which were perceived as disrespectful by one "side" or the other.

Perceived disrespect begats perceived disrespect begats perceived disrespect.

Who is going to step outside this cycle and say, hey, can we go about this differently? Because going on like this perpetuates nothing but bad feelings and a lot of lawyer fees.

I was sad, too. It really was a pretty dang good fan film, wasn't it?

I tried to find a replacement, but wasn't successful. I suspect they want folks to buy the long version and do their own snipping.

In reply to this comment by ant:
Aww. Gone?

Yeah, not something we need to invoke a discussion over every time someone uses a naughty thumb. Discuss should be used sparingly, because it pulls another user's video out of rotation. Temperance. Discrimination.

>> ^ant:
I meant the whole movie was fan-made for non-profit so Paramount(?) wouldn't care?


the movie is a porn video that is sold for money. What we see on sift here is just the edited one that someone did. There is no way universal would sit still with actual ST footage in a porno.

>> ^WaterDweller:

>> ^rychan:
Heh, that actually has some nice moments. Action was pretty cheesy, though. Data did a good job, but seeing him fidget was pretty out of character.
It didn't seem like there were many porn scenes edited out this. Were there only 2?

The whole thing is probably feature length, judging by the size of the various rips floating around (from 700-1400 MB). This scrubbed version is 26-27 minutes. So there are probably more than two porn scenes in it. EDIT: when looking at the pairings, I see several possibilities: Riker-Troy, Geordie-Braun, Worf-whatever-her-name, Data-Tasha, and Picard-Crusher at the end.


Your assumption is correct. 2 hours long with 5 scenes that you mentioned...

>> ^jmd:

>> ^ant:
>> ^jmd:
how are they able to get the rights to use the intro footage?

Isn't it fan-made?

Ahh, I thought the intro was used in the actual star trek porno.


I meant the whole movie was fan-made for non-profit so Paramount(?) wouldn't care?

>> ^ant:

>> ^jmd:
how are they able to get the rights to use the intro footage?

Isn't it fan-made?


Ahh, I thought the intro was used in the actual star trek porno.

>> ^jmd:

how are they able to get the rights to use the intro footage?


Isn't it fan-made?

>> ^rychan:

Heh, that actually has some nice moments. Action was pretty cheesy, though. Data did a good job, but seeing him fidget was pretty out of character.
It didn't seem like there were many porn scenes edited out this. Were there only 2?

The whole thing is probably feature length, judging by the size of the various rips floating around (from 700-1400 MB). This scrubbed version is 26-27 minutes. So there are probably more than two porn scenes in it. EDIT: when looking at the pairings, I see several possibilities: Riker-Troy, Geordie-Braun, Worf-whatever-her-name, Data-Tasha, and Picard-Crusher at the end.