>> ^robbersdog49:
Did anyone else's stomach turn inside out at 25 seconds?


Yup

Why the Islam tag though?
It's the spire on top a really tall skyscraper, it's not one of those Islamic prayer towers... minarets?

Did anyone else's stomach turn inside out at 25 seconds?

The king's crossing was the main attraction
Dominos are falling in a chain reaction
The scraping subject ruled by fear told me
Whiskey works better than beer

The judge is on vinyl, decisions are final
And nobody gets a reprieve
And every wave is tidal
If you hang around
You're going to get wet

I can't prepare for death any more than I already have
All you can do now is watch the shells
The game looks easy, that's why it sells
Frustrated fireworks inside your head
Are going to stand and deliver talk instead
The method acting that pays my bills
Keeps the fat man feeding in Beverly Hills
I got a heavy metal mouth that hurls obscenity
And I get my check from the trash treasury
Because I took my own insides out

It don't matter because I have no sex life
All I want to do now is inject my ex-wife
I've seen the movie
And I know what happens

It's Christmas time
And the needles on the tree
A skinny Santa is bringing something to me
His voice is overwhelming
But his speech is slurred
And I only understand every other word
Open your parachute and grab your gun
Falling down like an omen, a setting sun
Read the part and return at five
It's a hell of a role if you can keep it alive
But I don't care if I fuck up
I'm going on a date
With a rich white lady
Ain't life great?
Give me one good reason not to do it
So do it

This is the place where time reverses
Dead men talk to all the pretty nurses
Instruments shine on a silver tray
Don't let me get carried away
Don't let me get carried away
Don't let me be carried away

Id put it on inside out and go back to frowning.

At 1:26 you find nature's solution for how to turn a sphere inside out without creating creases.

http://www.videosift.com/video/How-to-turn-a-sphere-inside-out

You realize you can invoke dupeof on that, right? I would not have discarded it otherwise.

I'm not sure if its because I've worked with 3d models a lot in my life and have the occasion to see and identify inside-out things like these, but I find I have to press myself to 'see' the illusion.

>> ^westy:
well right , what dose an culter have to do with it ?
What the woman says could easily be correct IE a sum one would just get a random birth certificate to get cheep imergratoin. This is more than plusable. the News casters are completely retarded . Its a good example of how bad reporting is asking questions like "this person says you are a crank" I mean WTF sort of question is that . at the end of the peace the news people say we have researched it and have evidence , well why dont they present that clearly to the women ore use it to counter her argument.

It's an effort to demonstrate to their audience that this person can easily be "discredited." They want to tell their audience "look what people say about these 'birthers!' I mean really, how can anyone take them seriously?" I think it's a valid question what these birthers are asking, and honestly, I haven't seen any PROOF of the government-funded media's side of things. They keep telling us "here is proof," but it's yet to be hard and conclusive.


allso who gives a fuck where obama is from I Dont see why it matters , he could be a Taliban suicide bomber for all I care so long as his policies are good and he has consistently demonstraited good desisoins that benefit the society he governs.

It matters only as far as the constitution is concerned. This was from a time when they were worried about being taken over from the inside out from hostile forces. Of course, you could look at it from that perspective still today. Most countries in the world hate us, and would love to see us shown the door.

However, I have to disagree with you on your last point. He has not consistently made good decisions. His actions are effectively furthuring this recession. He's spending more money that we do not have that us taxpayers are going to have to be paying back for many years to come. We're trillions of dollars in debt, and yet he feels it's justified to go spend billions more on wars we can't afford to be in right now; wars in which we really have no right to be involved. He feels it's more important to spend millions on "fixing health care," when really it's not in such a dire state right now that it needs immediate attention. We need to focus on fixing the BASIS OF OUR COUNTRY before we can even THINK about fixing all the little things like health care (and, yes, it is a little thing when you consider our entire country is falling apart. Who gives a shit about health care when no one has jobs in the first place, and suicide rates are skyrocketing?) He spends millions on flying all over the place around the country and around the world, holding "meetings" and taking his motherfucking family on vacations. HEY, DIPSHIT! In case you hadn't noticed, YOU HAVE A COUNTRY TO RUN! This is not a free ticket to Disneyland! Stop acting like everything is fine, and fucking do something positive before you have open revolts and rioting.

FIX THE MOTHERFUCKING ECONOMY FIRST! WE CANNOT AFFORD ALL OF THIS WASTED SPENDING! He is deepening the recession and things are going to get a whole lot shittier in the next four years. He's going to be seen as worse than GWB, you mark my words.

Civil War II here we come!

Da Red Wunz go fasta!

That's how those Chinese gymnasts won all those gold, not because they are underage but because they are RED inside out!

>> ^thepinky:
EDIT: I got the needed nerdy assistance.

Hey, watch those epithets against people who know HTML. After all, comic book nerds might be clueless about them, and it's conceivable that in this day and age cool people might know the basics.

>> ^imstellar28:
thepinky wrote:
"I think that most of us believe that violence against the weak is more wrong than violence against the strong"
I agree with what you are saying, but you are wording it in a misleading way. Its not more wrong because of the inherent "weakness" of each person, it is more wrong because the same act of violence will cause more damage to a weaker person.

I both love and hate how you always present your opinions as if you're explaining the fundamental facts of the universe. I don't disagree with the idea that conflict between unequal parties is inherently unfair, and that when we're talking about violent conflict, the damage can be much, much worse (see the above clip, plus the Iraq wars).

Thing is, I don't think it's correct to call it sexist to feel that male-on-female violence is more wrong. Here's what the scholarly inflatablevagina had to say about the female point of view:

>> ^inflatablevagina:
I think a good thing to think about when viewing this video is how men and women deal with conflict differently. Ask any teenage girl.. more often than not, if you piss off a girl she will attack you emotionally. Guys attack each other physically more often than not. On a certain level we don't expect anyone to get physical with us because, for the most part, we would rather ruin you from the inside out. It can be much more effective.


Much as we're taught to instinctively deny the differences between man and women these days, the truth is that men and women truly have different ways of looking at social interaction. Perhaps that's a product of culture more than biology, but I wouldn't be surprised if it's a mix of both.

I think given the differences between men and women and their approach to conflict resolution, I think the general societal expectation -- sometimes phrased as "real men don't hit women" -- is merely a recognition of the fact that men and women deal with conflict differently. The idea being that when men have a conflict with a woman, they should restrain their impulse to physical violence, since women aren't generally encouraged to have fistfights over disagreements the way men are.

I don't see that as sexist, I see that as a rule of etiquette. Polite men are expected to behave differently in the company of women than they would in the company of men. I don't see anything discriminatory about that at all.

Therefore, it's "more wrong", because you're breaking the rules of social interaction, as well as breaking more fundamental rules like "don't hurt people". I'd still feel that him attacking her was extra wrong, even if she did some cool martial arts move, and knocked him on his ass and hadn't been harmed at all.

I think we should reserve the word sexism for behaviors that treat one sex as being of less value than the other, as opposed to social mores that help the differing cultures of men and women learn to live together in peace.

Saying that men hitting women is "more wrong" because women are naturally weaker seems like the more sexist explanation, even if on average it is true.

I think a good thing to think about when viewing this video is how men and women deal with conflict differently. Ask any teenage girl.. more often than not, if you piss off a girl she will attack you emotionally. Guys attack each other physically more often than not. On a certain level we don't expect anyone to get physical with us because, for the most part, we would rather ruin you from the inside out. It can be much more effective.

i knew we were kindred spirits



In reply to this comment by rottenseed:
Hello fellow 26 yo. I have an inflatable vagina too...

...only it's inside out

Hello fellow 26 yo. I have an inflatable vagina too...

...only it's inside out

Most of the people advocating water boarding are empty headed sheep who couldn't think and tie their shoelaces at the same time.

It's immoral! In my worldview (non-religious), that means that it does more damage than good to the person or group PERFORMING the act in the long term. What goes around comes around, and I mean that in a very literal, non-karmic kind of way. The US had established itself as a high-value society, and that is gone now. That means nobody in the world is going to get upset when our citizens get captured and tortured now. We had everybody behind us after 9/11, and now we have nobody behind us.

And why did we throw away our integrity? To prop up the lies that allowed us to invade a country with vast oil reserves. That's it. No ticking bomb. No network of terrorists. Just lies upon lies, for money and transitory power.

It is so clear to me that the Bush administration could signal the imminent fall of the US as a top player on the world stage, and these so-called patriots open their mouths to spew talking points in an effort to defend it. Defending actions which could very well destroy this country from the inside out. Yeah, real patriots.

Yes satirizing themselves, I'm convinced someones destorying that news corporation from the inside out.