search results matching tag: goddess
» channel: learn
go advanced with your query
Search took 0.000 seconds
Videos (55) | Sift Talk (4) | Blogs (3) | Comments (136) |
Videos (55) | Sift Talk (4) | Blogs (3) | Comments (136) |
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Bible To Be Taught In Public Schools In Arizona -- TYT
I'm a Kasparianist. You are my Goddess, Ana.
Shit Saltspring Islanders say.
Ugh. both excruciating and funny.
Upvoting for 'Oh my Goddess'
Don't stop in the outer lane!!
There is NOTHING wide angle about that camera.. hell my phone is probably more wide angle then what ever is being used here. The car stopped just fine.. no skidding.. hell he didn't even need to vear off to the side. I'm sure you're all goddesses on the road, but as one who has a perfectly safe driving record for 17 years and drives an hour and a half on I95 5 days a week, there wasn't anything unsafe about what the driver did. -_-
Owl loves doggie - oooooooowl, so cute!
Yup, but Artemis and Athena would be the best pair of owls Ever!
..and I think the dog probably just tastes like mouse.>> ^Skeeve:
Considering Athena, the Greek goddess of wisdom, courage, victory, etc., was actually represented as (or with) an owl, I can think of one name that would be better than Artemis .>> ^Payback:
Artemis: Greek God of Hunting
Never, throughout all time, has a pet owl been better named.
Owl loves doggie - oooooooowl, so cute!
Considering Athena, the Greek goddess of wisdom, courage, victory, etc., was actually represented as (or with) an owl, I can think of one name that would be better than Artemis .>> ^Payback:
Artemis: Greek God of Hunting
Never, throughout all time, has a pet owl been better named.
Pat Robertson: "Halloween Is Satan's Night"
Nice selective quoting.
"The classical (Roman) writers affirm that they offered on great occasions human sacrifices; as for success in war or for relief from dangerous diseases. Cæsar has given a detailed account of the manner in which this was done. "They have images of immense size, the limbs of which are framed with twisted twigs and filled with living persons. These being set on fire, those within are encompassed by the flames." Many attempts have been made by Celtic writers to shake the testimony of the Roman historians to this fact, but without success."
We have no reason to doubt the testimony of their contemporaries. And if you want more evidence, how about national geographic:
Druids Committed Human Sacrifice, Cannibalism?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/03/090320-druids-sacrifice-cannibalism.html
It's actually far worse than I thought. Far from a quaint little holiday where people mourned the dead, it was sick pagan bloodbath.
What's clear is that you're more interested in a convenient truth;; you said it yourself, you skim over the evidence in apathy, and just want to believe what you want. Doesn't change the facts though; Halloween celebrates an evil day where a bunch of savages worshipped demons, sacrificed human beings and apparently ate their flesh. I'm sorry, but there is nothing there for Christians to celebrate. Pat Robertson is 100 percent correct.
>> ^pho3n1x:
Show me where, in your first link, it mentions human sacrifice...
Instead, don't. I'll quote it for you:
That the Druids offered sacrifices to their deity there can be no doubt. But there is some uncertainty as to what they offered, and of the ceremonies connected with their religious services we know almost nothing.
Also, quoting the other article you mentioned regarding bonfires:
It comes from the contraction of bone fire, where the Celts used to burn animal bones to ward off evil spirits.
Try harder.
--
Catholic Mass, to my knowledge, is not based on pagan sacrifice at all, but rather using bread and wine as a "bloodless" sacrifice honoring the crucifixion of Christ. Granted, I only skimmed the articles because I'm not really that interested in the whole ordeal, but it seems to me like you don't like to read anything other than the pamphlets your church of choice provides about each secular holiday anyway, so I'm probably just wasting my time.
You can believe what you want to believe, let me believe what I want to believe.
--
Religion is like a penis.
It's awesome that you have one.
It's awesome that you're proud of it.
But please stop whipping it out and waving it around in public.
It's not any better or more important than mine.
>> ^shinyblurry:
Druids worshipped baal, engaged in human sacrifice:
http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_text_bulfinch_chxlia.htm\
This was not a wholesome little get together, and it did involve blood sacrifice. The root of bonfire is "bonefire" http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_origin_of_the_word_bonfire
No, not all spirits are demons; God is a spirit, and angels are spirits. Yet, many people have this idea of a dichotomy between "good" spirits and evil spirits, but in reality they're almost all evil spirits. Any spirit not sent by God is a demon. Spirits impersonating the dead are demons, spirits which claim to be other gods are demons, the spirits people channel are demons, etc. The astral realm is owned by Satan and populated by demons pretending to be every kind of fantasy someone could imagine, and many people wouldn't. There is no Goddess, there are no ghosts, there aren't any of these psychic manifestations. It all stems from Satan. Satan is a being, not a concept, as real as you and me, and he is the deceiver of this entire world.
I agree, Catholic mass is sacrifice, because it is pagan ritual the church took on as its own. It has nothing to do with God, but it does represent the union of the sun and moon, as per babylonian mystery religions.
By and large, people who practice sorcery, divination, channeling, "psychic" abilities, and the like are all doing Satans will. They all come out in droves to celebrate this evil day, to worship other gods and practice their witchcraft; basically to do all the things which God commanded us not to do. The only involvement Christians should have on this is to pray for those who are deceived.
>> ^pho3n1x:
I think you're misconstruing the use of the word "sacrifice" to summon imagery of blood sacrifice (ie Indiana Jones).
Not all sacrifice is macabre or evil. Catholic Mass is a sacrifice.
I've not read a single source regarding Samhain/Halloween/All Saints Eve, even one from "your side" of the argument, that alludes to human sacrifice.
http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Projects/Reln91/Blood/s
acrificemainpage.htm
Besides, "pagan" is a blanket term. The ones you are trying to illustrate are Druids. They would make animal sacrifices, which were then immediately consumed as part of the festival.
Satan does not exist in the religion which you are misunderstanding. Satan is a Christian idea.
And I still assert that spirits are not all demons. Is the Holy Spirit a demon?
Before you try to correct me, I also have a lot of personal experience in these matters, and I know that there are some misguided individuals. By and large though, "pagan" religions (as paganism is not in-and-of-itself a religion) do not share these views and simply see the matter for what it is. Animals and crops are harvested for the coming winter, and tribute is paid to "the death of a god", not to "a god of death".
Pat Robertson: "Halloween Is Satan's Night"
Show me where, in your first link, it mentions human sacrifice...
Instead, don't. I'll quote it for you:
That the Druids offered sacrifices to their deity there can be no doubt. But there is some uncertainty as to what they offered, and of the ceremonies connected with their religious services we know almost nothing.
Also, quoting the other article you mentioned regarding bonfires:
It comes from the contraction of bone fire, where the Celts used to burn animal bones to ward off evil spirits.
Try harder.
--
Catholic Mass, to my knowledge, is not based on pagan sacrifice at all, but rather using bread and wine as a "bloodless" sacrifice honoring the crucifixion of Christ. Granted, I only skimmed the articles because I'm not really that interested in the whole ordeal, but it seems to me like you don't like to read anything other than the pamphlets your church of choice provides about each secular holiday anyway, so I'm probably just wasting my time.
You can believe what you want to believe, let me believe what I want to believe.
--
Religion is like a penis.
It's awesome that you have one.
It's awesome that you're proud of it.
But please stop whipping it out and waving it around in public.
It's not any better or more important than mine.
>> ^shinyblurry:
Druids worshipped baal, engaged in human sacrifice:
http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_text_bulfinch_chxlia.htm\
This was not a wholesome little get together, and it did involve blood sacrifice. The root of bonfire is "bonefire" http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_origin_of_the_word_bonfire
No, not all spirits are demons; God is a spirit, and angels are spirits. Yet, many people have this idea of a dichotomy between "good" spirits and evil spirits, but in reality they're almost all evil spirits. Any spirit not sent by God is a demon. Spirits impersonating the dead are demons, spirits which claim to be other gods are demons, the spirits people channel are demons, etc. The astral realm is owned by Satan and populated by demons pretending to be every kind of fantasy someone could imagine, and many people wouldn't. There is no Goddess, there are no ghosts, there aren't any of these psychic manifestations. It all stems from Satan. Satan is a being, not a concept, as real as you and me, and he is the deceiver of this entire world.
I agree, Catholic mass is sacrifice, because it is pagan ritual the church took on as its own. It has nothing to do with God, but it does represent the union of the sun and moon, as per babylonian mystery religions.
By and large, people who practice sorcery, divination, channeling, "psychic" abilities, and the like are all doing Satans will. They all come out in droves to celebrate this evil day, to worship other gods and practice their witchcraft; basically to do all the things which God commanded us not to do. The only involvement Christians should have on this is to pray for those who are deceived.
>> ^pho3n1x:
I think you're misconstruing the use of the word "sacrifice" to summon imagery of blood sacrifice (ie Indiana Jones).
Not all sacrifice is macabre or evil. Catholic Mass is a sacrifice.
I've not read a single source regarding Samhain/Halloween/All Saints Eve, even one from "your side" of the argument, that alludes to human sacrifice.
http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Projects/Reln91/Blood/s
acrificemainpage.htm
Besides, "pagan" is a blanket term. The ones you are trying to illustrate are Druids. They would make animal sacrifices, which were then immediately consumed as part of the festival.
Satan does not exist in the religion which you are misunderstanding. Satan is a Christian idea.
And I still assert that spirits are not all demons. Is the Holy Spirit a demon?
Before you try to correct me, I also have a lot of personal experience in these matters, and I know that there are some misguided individuals. By and large though, "pagan" religions (as paganism is not in-and-of-itself a religion) do not share these views and simply see the matter for what it is. Animals and crops are harvested for the coming winter, and tribute is paid to "the death of a god", not to "a god of death".
Pat Robertson: "Halloween Is Satan's Night"
Druids worshipped baal, engaged in human sacrifice:
http://ancienthistory.about.com/library/bl/bl_text_bulfinch_chxlia.htm\
This was not a wholesome little get together, and it did involve blood sacrifice. The root of bonfire is "bonefire" http://wiki.answers.com/Q/What_is_the_origin_of_the_word_bonfire
No, not all spirits are demons; God is a spirit, and angels are spirits. Yet, many people have this idea of a dichotomy between "good" spirits and evil spirits, but in reality they're almost all evil spirits. Any spirit not sent by God is a demon. Spirits impersonating the dead are demons, spirits which claim to be other gods are demons, the spirits people channel are demons, etc. The astral realm is owned by Satan and populated by demons pretending to be every kind of fantasy someone could imagine, and many people wouldn't. There is no Goddess, there are no ghosts, there aren't any of these psychic manifestations. It all stems from Satan. Satan is a being, not a concept, as real as you and me, and he is the deceiver of this entire world.
I agree, Catholic mass is sacrifice, because it is pagan ritual the church took on as its own. It has nothing to do with God, but it does represent the union of the sun and moon, as per babylonian mystery religions.
By and large, people who practice sorcery, divination, channeling, "psychic" abilities, and the like are all doing Satans will. They all come out in droves to celebrate this evil day, to worship other gods and practice their witchcraft; basically to do all the things which God commanded us not to do. The only involvement Christians should have on this is to pray for those who are deceived.
>> ^pho3n1x:
I think you're misconstruing the use of the word "sacrifice" to summon imagery of blood sacrifice (ie Indiana Jones).
Not all sacrifice is macabre or evil. Catholic Mass is a sacrifice.
I've not read a single source regarding Samhain/Halloween/All Saints Eve, even one from "your side" of the argument, that alludes to human sacrifice.
http://www2.kenyon.edu/Depts/Religion/Projects/Reln91/Blood/sacrificemainpage.htm
Besides, "pagan" is a blanket term. The ones you are trying to illustrate are Druids. They would make animal sacrifices, which were then immediately consumed as part of the festival.
Satan does not exist in the religion which you are misunderstanding. Satan is a Christian idea.
And I still assert that spirits are not all demons. Is the Holy Spirit a demon?
Before you try to correct me, I also have a lot of personal experience in these matters, and I know that there are some misguided individuals. By and large though, "pagan" religions (as paganism is not in-and-of-itself a religion) do not share these views and simply see the matter for what it is. Animals and crops are harvested for the coming winter, and tribute is paid to "the death of a god", not to "a god of death".
Mommy Bohemian Rhapsody
>> ^Lawdeedaw:
>> ^ant:
>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Ha, two votes right at the end of it's life cycle. Lol. The Mountain Goddess is pleased.
It's = It is.
Thanks for the enlightenment... Its really helpful.
Its what?
Mommy Bohemian Rhapsody
>> ^ant:
>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Ha, two votes right at the end of it's life cycle. Lol. The Mountain Goddess is pleased.
It's = It is.
Thanks for the enlightenment... Its really helpful.
Mommy Bohemian Rhapsody
>> ^Lawdeedaw:
Ha, two votes right at the end of it's life cycle. Lol. The Mountain Goddess is pleased.
It's = It is.
Sagan: The Birth of Science
I agree, but the formless emptiness was itself created by the initial creation from nothing.
Genesis 1:1-3
In the beginning (Time) God created the heavens (Space) and the earth (Matter).
Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
And God said, “Let there be light (Energy),” and there was light.
>> ^hpqp:
Not to piss on your parade but the Genesis account isn't entirely ex nihilo... there was the tohu-bohu (chaos) - or "dark materials" as Milton put it - out of which God made everything. Even formless emptiness is something! <IMG class=smiley src="http://cdn.videosift.com/cdm/emoticon/wink.gif">
>> ^shinyblurry:
I know that particularly you disagree with any criticism of evolution, and thus consider the account of a literal six day creation to be without merit. However, I will say that the Genesis account of creation ex-nihilio, something from nothing, uniquely matches the evidence from the "big bang". There is no other creation account which postulates a creation from no prior material.
>> ^ChaosEngine:
>> ^shinyblurry:
In contrasting the many gods and goddesses, you can narrow it down very quickly by just examining the ones that make claims of creating the Universe. From there you can examine the individual claims and see if any of them match reality.
You're right. And funny enough, reality has nerve to disagree with pretty much every religion out there.
Also, Carl Sagan = insta-upvote. That is all.
Sagan: The Birth of Science
Not to piss on your parade but the Genesis account isn't entirely ex nihilo... there was the tohu-bohu (chaos) - or "dark materials" as Milton put it - out of which God made everything. Even formless emptiness is something!
>> ^shinyblurry:
I know that particularly you disagree with any criticism of evolution, and thus consider the account of a literal six day creation to be without merit. However, I will say that the Genesis account of creation ex-nihilio, something from nothing, uniquely matches the evidence from the "big bang". There is no other creation account which postulates a creation from no prior material.
>> ^ChaosEngine:
>> ^shinyblurry:
In contrasting the many gods and goddesses, you can narrow it down very quickly by just examining the ones that make claims of creating the Universe. From there you can examine the individual claims and see if any of them match reality.
You're right. And funny enough, reality has nerve to disagree with pretty much every religion out there.
Also, Carl Sagan = insta-upvote. That is all.
Sagan: The Birth of Science
I know that particularly you disagree with any criticism of evolution, and thus consider the account of a literal six day creation to be without merit. However, I will say that the Genesis account of creation ex-nihilio, something from nothing, uniquely matches the evidence from the "big bang". There is no other creation account which postulates a creation from no prior material.
>> ^ChaosEngine:
>> ^shinyblurry:
In contrasting the many gods and goddesses, you can narrow it down very quickly by just examining the ones that make claims of creating the Universe. From there you can examine the individual claims and see if any of them match reality.
You're right. And funny enough, reality has nerve to disagree with pretty much every religion out there.
Also, Carl Sagan = insta-upvote. That is all.
Sagan: The Birth of Science
>> ^shinyblurry:
In contrasting the many gods and goddesses, you can narrow it down very quickly by just examining the ones that make claims of creating the Universe. From there you can examine the individual claims and see if any of them match reality.
You're right. And funny enough, reality has nerve to disagree with pretty much every religion out there.
Also, Carl Sagan = insta-upvote. That is all.