>> ^peggedbea:

i wish! do they make those shirts?
but... i think he was talking about one of my dads. >> ^ChaosEngine:
>> ^peggedbea:
holy shit my nervous voice is annoying.

"someone who appreciates sex as much as you clearly do"
Were you wearing an "I love getting laid" t-shirt or something?



dunno... maybe videosift could start selling them

i wish! do they make those shirts?
but... i think he was talking about one of my dads. >> ^ChaosEngine:

>> ^peggedbea:
holy shit my nervous voice is annoying.

"someone who appreciates sex as much as you clearly do"
Were you wearing an "I love getting laid" t-shirt or something?

>> ^peggedbea:

holy shit my nervous voice is annoying.


"someone who appreciates sex as much as you clearly do"

Were you wearing an "I love getting laid" t-shirt or something?

>> ^quantumushroom:

He probably gets laid.


In a socialist way! No, seriously, he does get laid.

He probably gets laid.

Pat, Pat..When anyone sends energy your way without malice and from a place of love or concern that's extra energy for you man-We are all, devout in any direction or heathen scumbags destined for infamy with the breads cast and connected by so many threads used to weave the tapestry.
You need to get laid is all-

Yes, but we can choose..and we do choose..our will is over the evolutionary process in this artificial reality we've constructed. Soon we'll be able to select whatever we want. So this really does come down to what we value, and how we value it..because I guarantee you when we start programming our own DNA, downs syndrome will be written out. Humans will never value that, because no one wants their kid to be born like that.

Ultimately the only goal of a species is to survive, it doesn't matter what it evolves into..evolution is dumb and blind..there is no blue print for success. Just keep having sex and it'll all be alright. So eventually we will become the designer..and then the future of the species will be dependent on our values, or lack there of. I think that should scare any rational person.

So, what is the value of a functionally useless person who is a burden to society and can't experience a normal human life? God says that person is the same as you. Evolution says hes only good if he can get laid. Eugenics will say zero.


>> ^Ryjkyj:
I'm not kidding around when I say that evolution doesn't work that way Shiny. I really do mean that evolution doesn't work that way.
Whatever reproduces determines the course of evolution by whatever means necessary. It's not up to you or me or any scientist to determine the most appropriate configuration. That's why the whole "survival of the fittest" thing is always misinterpreted. "Fittest" doesn't mean "best", it means whatever happens to survive or "fit" that particular situation. You can't determine the best fit. You can guess, but you can't tell the future. And science is certainly not up to the task of accounting for all the variables, yet. Thus far, eugenics has had incredibly poor results.
One of the things that people most commonly don't understand about evolution is that each being includes some mutation, so you're not an exact 50/50 copy of your parents. So a person with a disability isn't necessarily going to pass it on to their offspring. And even if they do, if they survived to reproduce then they did something right.
Perpetuating aberration seems irrational to us. But actually, that's the way that evolution works.
Of course, I won't fault you for saying that it's so beautifully simplistic that it might just allude to some sort of a designer. <IMG class=smiley src="http://cdn.videosift.com/cdm/emoticon/smile.gif">

The contrast between and it's companion on the top 15 fro the moment is divine.

..and yes, as opposed to the other guy, this guy is getting laid tonight.

Actually I do get laid a lot. By blind hobo chicks.

No seriously. It's not cynical to think that a marketing corporation would abuse sentimentality for advertising, and even less surprising that they would do a bad job.>> ^Mindfuck:

You sure are quite cynical, I bet you get laid a lot.
>> ^messenger:
Puke. Fake sentimentality for viral marketing. That sign wouldn't work. It's the Amélie-type music that convinces us something deep and meaningful is coming. It's not. Here's a better sign: "I'd like to see my grandchildren. You can help." Or if he's beyond medical help: "You can help me save for my independence."

And just like that, he will never get laid again.

You sure are quite cynical, I bet you get laid a lot.
>> ^messenger:
Puke. Fake sentimentality for viral marketing. That sign wouldn't work. It's the Amélie-type music that convinces us something deep and meaningful is coming. It's not. Here's a better sign: "I'd like to see my grandchildren. You can help." Or if he's beyond medical help: "You can help me save for my independence."

Look at 8:22. The man is sooooooo getting laid.

>> ^jersalv1:

These guys are NEVER getting laid


Unless they're at a furniture store.

Jesus, can't I even get laid in my fictitious fantasy past?
In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
I'm just not seeing it. Even if you were born in the mythical Unlimited Blowjobs era.

In reply to this comment by rottenseed:

....my pale skin and abundant gut would be a status symbol that said: I don't have to work in the sun and I have plenty to eat. Women would be lining up to yank our cranks. Alas, we were born in the wrong time.

In reply to this comment by blankfist:
Glad to see you're as annoyed as me about this video: http://videosift.com/video/Killing-Us-Softly-vertising-s-Image-of-Women

I'm so sick of this pseudo-feminism bullshit that's code for "Look what the men are doing to us! We can't think for ourselves! We're victims!" Seriously what's terrifying about this is how many people on here are on the side of the video's message. If this truly was about equality, I'd be right there with them, but it's not.

I'm not sure where they see the inequalities in society anymore. And maybe I'm clueless and uninformed because I live in the liberal Mecca, Los Angeles, and I just don't see the glass ceilings. You know, my aunt moved out to California in the late 80s and was able to become the CEO of a huge, well-known clothing store. She was also president and vp of many successful clothing stores prior to that. Where's that glass ceiling I keep hearing about?

I've worked most of my life for women, and I've had ZERO problem with it. I've actually enjoyed a lot of my female bosses. Hell, even in the military I had two women directly above me. Hehe. There's a sexist joke in there somewhere?

There's no glass ceiling. Maybe in some of the larger corporations, but I'd wager it's not the majority of companies in America. And because legislation says they have to hire a "diverse" mix of employees, a lot of the people that come in through their internal "diversity departments" are treated like charity cases and not taken seriously. I've seen this happen and it's frustrating. Penis.

[/vagina monologue]

LOL!

In reply to this comment by Lann:
I don't think the speaker is ugly either. @The_Ham must not get laid with standards like that. >> ^Opus_Moderandi:

>> ^The_Ham:
Why is it the people complaining about this are always ugly women?

I don't think Kate Winslet is ugly.