😂 Nice try, I know you didn’t see a second of it…in reality the CNN town hall was so bad for the dementia riddled coward who skipped it and good for Harris that Harris converted multiple maggots on live tv, showing them it’s possible and you won’t “suddenly become black” or “become a woman” if you support Harris like your morons have been saying all summer. 😂

CNN “turned”!?! 😂 CNN turned maga in 2020, you know this but without “even cnn says” you have no one to quote so you ignore it. Every time you say it it’s like you are putting on a sign saying “I’m a dishonest baby” and wearing it all day. If you actually watched the CNN analysis you would know it was 75%+ positive, 95%+ positive if you culled the maga morons who would never under any circumstances praise her performance. 100%+ positive if she was judged the same way the twice impeached felonious rapist and fascist pedophile is.

Funny you skipped the non maga commentary discussing the double standards those idiots are applying…summed up well with “you accept him being lawless but insist she must be flawless”. One holds a town hall with Trumpists live and converts many, one has a Q&A session with only vetted maggots but still with no questions just swaying to music for 45 minutes in a stupor.

She summed up the entire race and difference between the candidates perfectly by saying…

“Donald Trump will have an enemies list, and I will have a “to do” list.”

Nothing could be more true. One campaign is 100% grievance and scapegoating with fake issues like CRT and threats to use the military against political rivals (and just spent 4 years proving it), one is focusing on solutions to real issues that actually effect American freedoms and the economy.

Hate to tell you, but the flood of fake right wing polls aren’t going to save him (the same fake polls that predicted the ‘22 red tsunami). Real polls are putting the results at as good as 55% Harris-30% Fascist Felon. Not a single reputable poll has the felon ahead more than the margin of error, and most show her ahead well above the margin of error. I know, you didn’t pass algebra, why am I talking statistics that are clearly too advanced for you? Maybe someone will explain it.

Such a sad little boy. Completely lost the ability to think for yourself, or at all, now you throw tantrums with cut and paste arguments that were losing arguments when they were first attempted and by the time you regurgitate them are debunked in every way and make you look ridiculous. Every lie you attempt relies on your listener to be as ignorant as you are, and that’s nearly impossible without being in a coma so your attempts fall flat every single time.

Derp!

The courts are fake news now? 😂

If you earned it with your 3rd grade grammar and math skills, it’s not just easy, it’s simple. Most degrees require at least a basic grasp of English, math, and science, and you have displayed a total lack of understanding in every category consistently for years.

Perhaps I’m Jethro…but highly unlikely, but I wasn’t the very top student in my class. That said, he got a 6th grade mountain education, by 6th grade I (and my entire class) was reading at college level, doing algebra, and taking biology. At what grade did you achieve those milestones, or did you ever?

True. True. Me in high school *yawn* algebra class.

The reason I'd use a biometric vs a keyed trigger lock is for speed and ease of use in the dark. If I have to give it a little squeeze to get it to release, zero concern. Does it secure the firearm? Yes. Is it 100%, no. Show me one that is.

p.s. in a random sampling, the twenty-three 15 year old boys in my algebra class, none of them own or plan to buy a flat piece of bent metal that precisely fits in a lock of this type, let along lock picking tools. The determination that this lock is no good is based on tests that have little to do with the intended function.

The problem is that it's confusing theory with the method. The right hand method(henceforth referred to as right method) shows that 35*2+35*10=35*12. It takes all of a couple minutes to show a class that. Spend a little time reminding them of the theory, put have them practice the right method. This isn't a mathematical theory exercise, this is performing basic arithmetic. It's why you segway into algebra later and show kids a(x +y)=ax+ay

I would piss off my teachers, and later profs, by never showing "my work" on complex algebra. Kept doing it in my head.

"Find for X"

X=3.56

WRONG!!!

It isnt 3.56?

Yes, but you didn't show your work.

Meh.

It's part of common core. Supposedly it makes it easier to understand the theory behind math so later in higher level classes (algebra, trig, etc) they can easily break the harder equations down.

Beats me, I learned the old way and it worked for me through algebra 1/2, and geometry.

I hated algebra.

When it comes to algebra, I knew I picked the right guy.

When it comes to the differences of other cultures did you find the common thread?

Lol. I actually found both incredibly interesting.
Comparative religions taught me tons about other cultures and why they might act differently on top of some great mythology. Algebra taught me that math COULD be used in the real world to solve real problems, not just to waste 6th grader's time.

I would fall asleep in that class like I did in algebra class.

Bitch, I shit Algebra RIGHT. FUCKING. NOW.

Thank you for taking the time to lay this all out and provide links to the curriculum, I appreciate it. As a Canadian abroad, I had heard that some of the requirements were going a bit sideways, and down here in Texas the schools are a bit of a mixed bag as well, but your situation is worse (my wife teaches Algebra and Calculus at the junior high). Just "Wow" ... I have no words. I feel sorry for the poor kids who are smart enough to know the answer in their head, but are forced to spend their progressively fewer hours of free time to figure out this bullshit.

Thanks again.

@bcglorf

I'll have to take your word for how they're marked on this, because you've talked to the teachers and whatnot, and i've spent 20 mins looking at the document without finding any regulations on it. I spent most of my time reading the examples. The rest was chock full of text and a bit hard to digest so like a true scientist i gave up.

I can't defend that, i think in essence they've got a very good idea. I've always been good with maths, and i remember when i was learning what i thought were hard bits, i'd find shortcuts a lot like they suggest. And by luck that helped me a lot with more advanced maths. I think these methods are great to set people up for algebra, infinitesimals and therefore calculus. But it's also a very top heavy burden to place on a learning mind, and you're presuming they'd have a use for it, or have the knack for it. And then if you test them on it, you're testing their ability to do stuff they don't need yet.

The way you say it, it's like it was designed by someone with a bit of a gift for maths but no idea about teaching, or kids, or how other people think. These are great ideas for pushing kids to better understanding though. Could easily confuse people.

I don't disagree with that. I don't understand how one could do any advanced mathematics without knowing arithmetic, so clearly it should be taught first.
As far as I was concerned, proofs were just demonstrating an understanding of arithmetic and how numbers and functions can be deconstructed in different ways. I hate showing my work, and almost failed that portion of algebra 2 because I just refused.