So, you want to call african-americans "nigger" straight to their face?

>> ^Mcboinkens:


And I'm fine with not using the word faggot as an insult as long as homosexuals are fine with me calling them faggots straight to their face. If you don't want a word to evolve and lose its original meaning that's fine, but then you better be ready to start facing the word in its original meaning.

[redacted]

>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

Eminem is an idiot. >> ^Matthu:
Ahhh bullshit! Joe Rogan's a fucking faggot.
I really like the way Eminem drew the line in the movie 8 mile. He's battling and he points to the gay guy and says, "He's gay," then points to the douchebag and says, "You're a faggot."
People need to get way over themselves and let these words evolve, since, hate to break it to you, they ain't going away.



No, he's not.

Eminem is an idiot. >> ^Matthu:

Ahhh bullshit! Joe Rogan's a fucking faggot.
I really like the way Eminem drew the line in the movie 8 mile. He's battling and he points to the gay guy and says, "He's gay," then points to the douchebag and says, "You're a faggot."
People need to get way over themselves and let these words evolve, since, hate to break it to you, they ain't going away.

I don't care for Joe Rogan, but I completely agree that people need to stop using "gay" or "faggot" as their go-to insult.

I'm the first person to defend free speech and tell people that they don't have to right to not be offended, but there is just no point in using those words. Firstly, it can be very hurtful to homosexuals, and freedom of speech doesn't mean we should just insult people for no reason. Secondly, being gay isn't a bad thing so why should calling someone gay/faggot be an insult? Unless one is very homophobic, a self-hating homosexual, or incredibly insecure about their sexuality, being called that should bother one as much as being called "four-eyes" if one doesn't have glasses.

I swear at first glance with his UFC color commentary career and his appearance he looks like such a douchbag. The more I listen to Joe Rogan though the more I think that we'd be cool.

Ahhh bullshit! Joe Rogan's a fucking faggot.

I really like the way Eminem drew the line in the movie 8 mile. He's battling and he points to the gay guy and says, "He's gay," then points to the douchebag and says, "You're a faggot."

People need to get way over themselves and let these words evolve, since, hate to break it to you, they ain't going away.

>> ^Taint:
Also, and probably more importantly, if building seven can only be explained by controlled demolition then where are all the engineers on this topic? Why does it only seem to be people without a professional background in such things the ones saying it couldn't have happened when the boilers exploded or whatever the official claim states.

Here you go

http://videosift.com/video/9-11-Blueprint-for-Truth-Compelling-Presentation

joe rogan continues to drop truthbomb after truthbomb

Thought you might enjoy this rant

Wow, I admit that I also didn't expect this with the name "Joe Rogan" on the title.

But that was a pretty concise representation of the truly salient, and inherent problems with US Foreign policy, and with some good editing and clips to boot.

I can't say I'm in love with the building seven bit at the end though.

Operation Northwoods clearly shows it's not beyond question for nefarious plans against our own citizens to reach the highest offices of the Pentagon and even meet with approval.

But I just find it nearly impossible to believe that the same minds who could conceive and carry out a plan like this would not realize that they could've gotten away with whatever they want for far, far less than anything approaching the scale of nearly destroying downtown Manhattan.

I mean the Gulf of Tonkin Incident was some destroyer out somewhere in a sea most Americans couldn't find on a map if their lives depended on it. And that was enough of an excuse to invade south east asia!

Keep in mind that the Gulf of Tonkin Bullshit story was drafted AFTER operation Northwoods was rejected by Kennedy. They already knew that a justification to gear up the military required nearly nothing. So why would they stage this elaborate hoax to accomplish what they could do anyway? Hell, even the first Gulf War showed the American appetite for war was a lot different then what they dealt with in the late 60's and 70's.

Americans these days only need a short empty speech with zero content, a flag waving fireworks extravaganza, a country music song or two and we'd be willing to invade fucking Canada.

It wasn't needed.

Also, and probably more importantly, if building seven can only be explained by controlled demolition then where are all the engineers on this topic? Why does it only seem to be people without a professional background in such things the ones saying it couldn't have happened when the boilers exploded or whatever the official claim states.

And if destroying some sort of unique treasure trove of financial documents was the goal then it seems an awfully elaborate way to torch a building, but what do I know I guess.

I'm just typing too much.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Joe Rogan, The American War Machine' to 'Joe Rogan, The American War Machine, Operation Northwoods, industrial war complex' - edited by eric3579

Operation Northwoods -wiki

Eisenhowers Farewell Address -video

Joe Rogan talks about Wikileaks -video

Wow. Joe Rogan just went up in my books.

Until this video, I assumed him to be one of those people that question things for the sake of being a rebel, because in their mind being different is cool, and just wanted to stroke their ego... 'I'm so different because I don't accept the legitimacy of authority'. However, this video makes me realizes he's someone who actually gains an understanding of things from questioning thing, and is not just questioning to be a (mainstream) rebel, to make stroke his ego that he's so unique. Not to mention, he articulates it well that its (only) a select powerful few doing horrible things for a profit, and it so happens they control the American government through various means, and psychologically have fooled all of america.

>> ^bobknight33:

Joe Reagen So he is the authority on this subject matter?

However the other dude actually goes out and investigates and actually sees a large vessel way up a mountain which happens to have the proper dimensions as listed in the BIBLE and to be in the relative area with respect to biblical reading. He does not actually claim it to be the ARC but indicates striking coincidence.

Shameful


If they've in fact proven that there is a "boat" there, good on them. So they found the vessel from which all of these inter-religious stories stem from. This does not make the stories true.

Do you actually believe it was physically possible to fit two of every animal (including insects and other tiny organisms) in the world on a single boat?

If you can say yes to that question I'd like to see the schematics of the boat you have in mind and the explanation of how only a single family was able to build this vessel.

What this is, is exactly what Joe Rogan says and what others in this thread have re-iterated. It's probably a story about some major cataclysm that happened in the past, before the written word, and was passed down by word-of-mouth, like one giant game of telephone that spans centuries and maybe even millenia before it was even written down.