joedirt US

Member Profile

Channel: Elections
Birthdate: January 5th, 1970 (54 years old)

Member Since: June 18, 2006
Last Power Points used: September 5, 2012
Available: now
Power Points at Recharge: 1   Get More Power Points Now!

Comments to joedirt

joedirt says...

Google cache from March 6th

profile
unsifted videos (0)
personal queue videos (15)
sifted videos (328)
promoted published vids
promoted queued vids
promoted Sift Talk posts
promoted blog posts
blog entries (0)
Sift Talk posts
poll/siftquisition posts
discarded posts
killed videos
dead/deadpool videos (30)

Member Stats
Rank: 34
Rating: 387 star points
Top 15 Videos: 1
Votes Received: 9243
Average Votes Per Video: 28.18
Votes Cast: 8295
Comments Posted: 4453 • browse
Comments Applauded: 13
Sifted Videos: 328
Sift Talk Posts: 93
Quality Sift Talk Posts: 49
Dead Pool Fixes: 2
Public Playlists: 15 • browse
Profile Views: 39691

blankfist says...

LEGION OF DOUCHE!
<embed src="http://423smith.com/wp-content/doom.jpg">

You are not smart. I've seen what you have to say and in no way am I inspired. You are the most retarded redneck I've ever met. You always have a future with Videcu.lt. You worthless nerd.

lucky760 says...

I considered the idea of a promoted video queue, but since there are hours before a video leaves the box, the queue would grow infinitely long. Also people would hate the idea of promoting something then waiting some unknown interval before the promotion actually happens.

In reply to this comment by joedirt:
Dag.. I think the coding might be too complex, but it might be possible to queue up all the promotes and let them all get their full time "in the box".

So first four in stay and it's one in, one out after that if there is a lot of promotes. I often see times with nothing promoted, there probably is just a rush hour issue.

10768 says...

In reply to this comment by joedirt:
In reply to this comment by mharvey42:
(Your equating Churchill with Hitler ultimate proof of that)


Do you know nothing of Churchill's words regarding the inferiority of Jews? You are completely clueless. Please start questioning your own beliefs when you are sooooo clueless.

His words regarding Jews are mixed: "Some people like the Jews, and some do not. But no thoughtful man can deny the fact that they are, beyond any question, the most formidable and the most remarkable race which has appeared in the world."

His words regarding Islam are unequivecal, and ring true through the years: "How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries.

Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men.

Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities — but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."
The River War, volume II pp. 248–50 (1899)

Churchill was a great man: a benefit to humanity. To equate him with Hitler robs you of your last shred of credibility.

10768 says...

In reply to this comment by joedirt:
In reply to this comment by mharvey42:

That's a keen and concise use of sarcasm, and one wasted on most of the sheeple here. The Jews excel the world around at arts, entertainment, science, medicine, business and finance, literature, the list goes on.
Muslims the world around have devoted their genius to killing, destroying societies, oppressing women and, oh ya, Allah.

The Mohammaden blight has nothing to do with race. It is the culture and religeon. Pakistan, Phillipines, Thialand, India, Iraq, Darfur, Beslan, Sweden, France, Britian. All these places and more they are assaulting the rules of law and advancing barbarism.


---
You are clearly a racists. Your sick twisted mind can't see that if you swap Jew with Caucasian and Muslim with Jew you sound exactly like Churchill or Hitler? There are some pitfalls with your racial superiority statements, but the irony is lost on you. You are sad and ignorant of any western civ history.

----
Dirt - Muslim (Islam) is not a race, it is a religion (or cult). There are Muslims of many, many ethnic types, as there are Arabs (and "Palestinians" of both various Muslim and Christian sects.

I am well versed in many aspects of Western Civilization and culture, as well as other cultures. This allows me to eexamine much of the same empirical evidence, and dran different conclusions than you and the "me too" crowd. You will benefit from this Diversity of Opinion.

I am emphatically not racist, I recognize abject evil, and will continue to point it out in the actions and policies of Hamas. The moral equivalence you espouse is a twisting of logic around a dark core of emptiness.
(Your equating Churchill with Hitler ultimate proof of that)

spoco2 says...

Oh come on, I'm not trying to drag his name into the mud, what shits me beyond belief is biased and emotive reporting.

Rather than reporting the facts, and as many of them as there are to hand (what was actually going on that caused them to be pulled out of the train etc.), they paint the victim as a saint.

I'm in NO WAY trying to say he deserved to be shot, not at all, or make him out to be a bad person. What I'm saying is that I hate any reporting of a story like this that skews itself so far one way or the other.

If you're going to tell us that he has a 4 year old to a girlfriend and was 'trying really hard' of late to be a better person, how about you also enlighten us as to what he was doing before hand that made him have to become a better person. OR... just don't tell us any of that superfluous information at all, and maybe tell us MORE about what happened during the incident rather than all this extraneous bullshit.

You are firmly of one belief without knowing all the facts. YES I can't see any other reality other than this guy was VERY, VERY in the wrong. But in what way, we don't yet know... (yes, he shot him, but was it some serious anger management, a mistake, having a real issue with fear, what?) and if he somehow actually avoids any trial then that is seriously fucked up and wrong on so many levels.

So, I'm not trying to make the victim out to be a bad guy, but painting inaccurate pictures of either party doesn't help matters at all.

In reply to this comment by joedirt:
Also, spoco, you got some nerve trying to drag the dead guys name into the mud. It doesn't matter if he was a saint or an ex-con. Police Officers should do their jobs and treat people properly based on the situation.

It doesn't make it right to shoot someone (on purpose or accidentally) or even attempt to use lethal force (point a gun at suspect) in this situation. The only possible justification that will come out of this was Mehserle thought he patted down a weapon.

It is still manslaughter for such gross negligence in this video. The dead man did have a child and the coverup and lack of response by the BART police is relevant.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists

Member's Highest Rated Videos