Security Inquiry...Security Review? Not According To FBI

"There goes that line that they've used for 9 months."-classic

It's sickening that this is who the Democrats want to put up against Trump, knowing full well that she'll be indicted <1 month before the election, and knowing that she polls terribly against Trump, while Bernie has no scandals in either his past or in the pipeline AND polls exponentially better than Clinton VS Trump. I can't fathom why they're throwing this election away. Can they really be that stupid?
MilkmanDansays...

@newtboy -- "It's sickening that this is who the Democrats want to put up against Trump, knowing full well that she'll be indicted <1 month before the election, and knowing that she polls terribly against Trump, while Bernie has no scandals in either his past or in the pipeline AND polls exponentially better than Clinton VS Trump. I can't fathom why they're throwing this election away. Can they really be that stupid?"

The more I think about it, the more I venture into "vast conspiracy" territory. The key question is who stands to gain MORE by having Hillary be the president than they stand to LOSE if she loses to Trump? Status quo, establishment Democrat elites, that's who. If Hillary wins, they win -- she is one of them. If Trump wins, they still win, because they feel comfortable betting that Trump will screw things up bad enough to push huge numbers of independents and moderate Republicans to the Democrat side for years to come.

The scary part is that when you think about it, it seems like a quite rational play from their perspective...

newtboysays...

Only if they can ignore the next 4 years and assume they'll survive them intact.
I make no such assumption, and I don't plan on extended hibernation, making either scenario horrendous.

MilkmanDansaid:

..... The scary part is that when you think about it, it seems like a quite rational play from their perspective...

Drachen_Jagersays...

Tangentially, in Nevada, Sanders was set to scoop a majority of the remaining 12 delegates today through better mobilization of his delegates (even though Clinton took the state, he managed to get more state delegates to the state convention).

When the state chair saw that Sanders was going to scoop more of the leftover delegates, they changed the rules at the last minute to give 7 of the 12 to Hillary.

newtboysays...

That, and other inconsistencies, are why I will never vote for Clinton. Her candidacy is illegitimate and only succeeds by fraud....and even after they cheat her way to the nomination they'll have a number of huge fights to fight...not the least of which is (likely numerous) criminal indictment(s) on numerous fronts planned for late October.
I can't fathom why the DNC wants to lose so badly, but clearly they've hitched their wagon to her and plan to follow her career into the grave. WTF people?

Drachen_Jagersaid:

Tangentially, in Nevada, Sanders was set to scoop a majority of the remaining 12 delegates today through better mobilization of his delegates (even though Clinton took the state, he managed to get more state delegates to the state convention).

When the state chair saw that Sanders was going to scoop more of the leftover delegates, they changed the rules at the last minute to give 7 of the 12 to Hillary.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More