I don't care about the timing, political motivation, etc. etc. of this discovery of new emails. I think only 2 things matter:

1) Are they real / legitimate. But with all of the previous leaks, I never saw the Clinton camp trying to suggest that anything was fabricated. Taking stuff out of context to make it appear worse than what it arguably is doesn't count count as "fabricated". As much as I dislike Clinton, I have to give her credit for dealing with the out of context stuff so far in the proper way -- fill in the context so that people can make up their own minds (like some of the Wall Street speech excerpts, "public and private position", etc.).

2) Do they show anything actually criminal, even it is relatively minor. Capone went down for tax evasion, because that was the only thing they could successfully and concretely pin on him. And yet justice was served by going forward with that.

IF (and it remains a big if) these new emails end up meeting both of those criteria, I have absolutely zero sympathy for the whining that already has and will continue to erupt from the Democrat party.

Being a candidate in a presidential election paints a giant target on you and guarantees that your past is going to be under the microscope. If you've got skeletons in your closet, there is a very high chance for them to be discovered. Trump has had a well-deserved taste of that already -- maybe it is Clinton's turn now.

I'm actually completely happy to turn a blind eye to anything illegal Clinton has done, short of murder - just for the sake of keeping Donald Trump out. Because if justice is important to you, then justice will be abused far worse if Trump gets in.
Of course after Clinton wins the election, I hope they throw the book at her.

I almost agree, except for the timing part and the public disclosure of yet to be read 'evidence' in an open investigation which appears to be purely politically motivated.
What about the fact that they've had these emails for weeks, if not longer, but waited until it would have maximum effect on the election to inform congress (and therefore the public), against the direction of the D.O.J. that warned against notifying congress of this mid investigation 'development' (which likely is nothing more than normal work emails to her assistant, something that could be determined in a single hour if they just READ them), or the fact that they insist they can't tell if there's anything improper before the election, creating this false question about her criminality.
What about the public disclosure of yet to be analyzed evidence that likely is nothing, but the disclosure without analysis reopens a question in the minds of many voters, a question that's been answered repeatedly by numerous thorough investigations with no criminal act found by any of them?
To me, the timing and abnormal public disclosures of non-information are clearly politically motivated efforts by the FBI director to harm her candidacy, something that's undeniably wrong and a horrific precedent to set.

Tags for this video have been changed from 'Real time, bill maher, monologue' to 'Real time, bill maher, monologue, 2016' - edited by bareboards2

Why is he on the set of Jeopardy?

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by fissionchips.

Fixed