He's wrong on one point. He says "No one wants to take someone's life," but there are plenty of cops who've proven that's simply not true.

'Does not necessarily mean they should die'. Wow, this is some serious PR work. They're going to Ferguson with it first. Hmmm? No one's ever going to use that. It's not practical for one. If they wanted non-lethal, I believe there's already rubber bullets, batons, and tasers.

So it's a bullet condom.

Moving this video to newtboy's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

without many bullets they shoot, this would work out too well. http://gawker.com/cleveland-cop-who-fired-49-rounds-into-car-acquitted-of-1706508566

It's like something from a NRA novelty store, clown noses for guns.

What is your definition of 'plenty'?

When it comes to killing people unnecessarily and not accidentally, more than a couple is plenty.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_killings_by_law_enforcement_officers_in_the_United_States

QUICK! Find a reason to justify murdering 200-600 a year!

I'm sure you have personal, first-hand knowledge that they were definitely clearly all dangerous violent criminals.

Lantern logic:

600 = not that much because..
"COPS ARE ALWAYS GOOD & RIGHT!"

*pushes everyone out of his 1950s bubble*