Thanks for the promote. Also, I think MrFisk ought to get banned unless he can explain himself. No bronze star should protect you if you don't earn it (i.e. if you cheat by using sock-puppetry to get it in the first place).

Which only confirms my suspicion that you have a spidey sense.

In reply to this comment by Farhad2000:
I ninja fixed it right when you deaded it

In reply to this comment by Tofumar:
*dead

Here's your fix:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xqUXDdJ3C-c

*dead

Here's your fix:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xqUXDdJ3C-c

*bravo

Harold Ickes has maybe the most appropriate name ever.

Um.....wow.

Yeah, I think MrFisk has a heavy burden of proof to meet right now.

*Islam

52 star points a year just for repromoting something older? I don't know about that. Given that it's only Gold-100's and above that can promote anyway, this seems like a way to give the people at the top of the heap an extra hand up. That's especially true if you consider that they probably sifted those older videos in the first place. Maybe if we do this, we should make a rule that you can't repromote an old post if it belongs to you. It seems a bit much that people might be able to pick up a ton of star points and a bunch of votes on their old videos for nothing more than shameless self-promotion.

In reply to this comment by kronosposeidon:
>> ^dag:
^ that's an interesting idea. It makes me think that we could also somehow reward members for "resifting" old gems.

And that gives me another idea: You know how we can fix dead videos any time we want, but can only receive one star a week for doing so, correct? Well how about we do something similar with promoting old videos. Let's say if you * promote an old video, let's say at least 6 months old, then you get a star, but you can only receive one once per week. Is that possible, and would that be a good idea?

^ 52 star points a year just for repromoting something older? I don't know about that. Given that it's only Gold-100's and above that can promote anyway, this seems like a way to give the people at the top of the heap an extra hand up. That's especially true if you consider that they probably sifted those older videos in the first place. Maybe if we do this, we should make a rule that you can't repromote an old post if it belongs to you. It seems a bit much that people might be able to pick up a ton of star points and a bunch of votes on their old videos for nothing more than shameless self-promotion.

Oh, Sifty, you are always so cruel to me. Yet I come back and *beg for more.

"...she's an appeasing appeaser promoting appeasement by wearing an appeaser scarf. And peddling donuts. APPEASEMENT donuts!"

Yes, she's already given the holes away to the enemy in a vain attempt to stave off their lust for blood.

Darn you and your speed sifting! You're makin' us look bad, man!

Congrats.

^ Don't be so sure. We corrupt 'em pretty young in Oklahoma.

Sorry, JTZ, but this one is a dupe:

http://www.videosift.com/video/Horatio-Caines-Seemingly-Endless-Opening-Sequence-Zingers

*discard