the bottom's just warping randomly.

wonder what chomsky would think of this, a lot of his theories include how the way our languages work are innate

Iranian pilots can pull even more similarly impressive stunts (hint, hint : bombing them not a good idea)

$10 bill to the usual address, each time you get a hit from it,
thanks.

i wonder what his explanation would be of what he was doing with a knife to that fake baby.
also, why does he have it with him,
what is it that he likes about it so much.

if anyone could summarize what the possible presence of thermate in the debris means that would be great (sorry but the video is a bit long).

what are the only possible explanations for it's presence?

thanks

Enceladus is not visible from the Earth with the naked eye, but can be seen with a telescope.

'The main obstacle in discovery of Enceladus was it's small angular distance from Saturn. It's brightness is 11.8m (almost 209 times fainter than the faintest stars visible to naked eye). For comparison: Saturn's brightness is about 0.7m, so Enceladus is shining fainter by about 11.1m.

The corresponding difference in brightness is over 27.5 thousand times!'

surely it's more complex than that, as the big bang was needed too. the curled up strings coming after the infinitely dense singularity. random fluctuations leading to this reality and those types of curled up dimensions.

right now, right where you are, there are other yous that are currently in 'deep doo-doo'..

thepinky,
your argument is worse than hitchens', when you say 'false religion' - is that supposed to mean there is a true religion?
and what's 'god is the perfect being' supposed to mean? which god, what about polytheisms?...
i could go on, but i'd just like to point out that someone that believes in young-earth creationism (that disagrees with evolution) isn't fully able to grasp the implications of what we've discovered with science.
theism in itself is just a point of view, like atheism, but being religious is indoctrination and poisoning of the mind by writings that we now know can't be true.

shame the presenter just 'thinks' he's funny, neil tyson had to pretend to laugh, youch

hopefully in the future people will be called up on spreading lies on billboards, so the religious ones would have to be pulled down - and the ones made by freethinkers would be the only ones standing.

it's not that they're increasing in severity, it's that those that are seriously planned will be the ones that will be successful. there are other factors, but them getting more and more severe (somehow exponentially) isn't one of them - that's unfounded.

and there was me thinking he was going to say the complete opposite

unfortunately this is the new voice of britain