Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
9 Comments
eric3579says...*promote
siftbotsays...Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Monday, November 14th, 2016 6:06am PST - promote requested by eric3579.
Spacedog79says...Well said. Pretty much sums up my view on Trump.
Engelssays...I wish he'd stop fussing with his nose.
shagen454says...I definitely like Zizek's films, but I think Chomsky is right about Zizek... I'm glad that Zizek is man enough to still admire good ol' Chomster.
aaronfrsays...What does Chomsky say about Zizek?
I definitely like Zizek's films, but I think Chomsky is right about Zizek... I'm glad that Zizek is man enough to still admire good ol' Chomster.
shagen454says...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVBOtxCfan0
I don't agree with Chomster's smugness completely, I think that theory & leftfield (pseudo) "intellectualism" needs to have a niche that is entertaining, of which Zizek surely fills the void of. But, Chomsky, is a stick to the facts sort, which is why I find Chomsky to be so important. We can't refute the facts and Chomsky is a great analyst of history.
What is it that Zizek exactly does? He is influential for being a sort of thinking man's political comedian, a jester to a degree; I think that is, in and of itself important (even inspirational) but I can see Chomsky's critical perspective in seeing it as just a bunch of posturing (jester prancing in a circle; ouroboros) that gets nothing done.
What does Chomsky say about Zizek?
vilsays...Chomsky is a scientist in a limited field. Žižek is a philosopher (yes, indeed, what exactly does he DO?).
It is difficult to compare them (and it is not a competition). Chomsky has a body of work to back his views up, Žižek has interesting insights if you can keep up with what "..and so on and so on" means in a specific context.
Most often I find that I agree with what Chomsky says and am entertained or puzzled by what Žižek has to say.
shagen454says...Well said!
Chomsky is a scientist in a limited field. Žižek is a philosopher (yes, indeed, what exactly does he DO?).
It is difficult to compare them (and it is not a competition). Chomsky has a body of work to back his views up, Žižek has interesting insights if you can keep up with what "..and so on and so on" means in a specific context.
Most often I find that I agree with what Chomsky says and am entertained or puzzled by what Žižek has to say.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.