Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
19 Comments
siftbot2 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
NetRunner*politics
*news
*equality
*waronterror
siftbotAdding video to channels (Equality, News, Politics, Waronterror) - requested by NetRunner.
slickheadsays...I suppose they expected him to behave differently. How unbelievably gullible.
StuThey give people like this their own show?
blankfistWell that was entertaining.
TrancecoachWhenever I hear O'Reilly, I remember the definition of the word, bloviate -- which is what happens to a pus-filled boil, right before it bursts.
But I'm with Whoopi on this one:
If Muslims attacked us on 9/11, then Christians brought down the Murrah building in Oklahoma City
westylol such a piontless argument and just yelling.
these programs are so thick as they dont realy discuss things in anny inteligent way its just random peoples opinoins and they are not evan skilled at exspressing them , what is sad is that when u do have inteligent people weather religouse, insane , or not , they often only get 2 min to say something on the news.
We should have tv programs that are 2-4 hours of structured talking between interlectuals or properly planed debates that would allow an audeance to actualy listen to inteligent arguments give opertunity for people talking to inteligently and clearly rebut what sumone has said.
maby have a good documentry on something thats 60 min allowing an audeance to get a good idea of the issues and then have leaders in the feald debate aspects of the issues at hand.
Gallowflak@westy
Structured debates between intelligent and articulate people aren't watched. They just aren't. The fact that a show like this one can even exist in a competetive environment scares the shit out of me. It's hard to watch TV and struggle through the banality, the stupidity, the inaccuracies and lies and bullshit and mental bankruptcy. But it's harder to stomach that it's all there for a reason. It gets watched.
westy>> ^Gallowflak:
@<a rel="nofollow" href="http://videosift.com/member/westy" title="member since July 25th, 2006" class="profilelink">westy
Structured debates between intelligent and articulate people aren't watched. They just aren't. The fact that a show like this one can even exist in a competetive environment scares the shit out of me. It's hard to watch TV and struggle through the banality, the stupidity, the inaccuracies and lies and bullshit and mental bankruptcy. But it's harder to stomach that it's all there for a reason. It gets watched.
yes i know they arent watched as much as shit , but when you have something like The BBC that dosent realy matter I have to pay around £150 to the bbc every year , and its for that resoin why the bbc should have programs in a format like i discussed , and then they could re show the debates in schools.
id rather they not spend the money on exspensive tv presenters F1 lisence or things like doctor who , evan though they can be quite enjoyable , id rather take that hit inorder to have high quality more educatoinal focus , we can leve the entertainment to the comercail channels.
braindonutsays...This couldn't have possibly gone better for all involved.
$$$$$$$$$$$
enonsays...*squawk squawk squawk
That's pretty much all I could make out
Bruti79says...*in creepy Cobra Commander voice*
Yessssss, *rubs hands together* your rage fuels my stupidity machine, yessssssss!
AnimalsForCrackerssays...America, land of the freeeee,
with 500 plus channels of less than useless TV
I once was lost but now I squeeeee,
as I now watch the BBC via limey proxy
siftbotTags for this video have been changed from 'whoopi goldberg, jo behar, the view, bill oreilly, interview, walk off stage, mosque' to 'whoopi goldberg, joy behar, the view, bill oreilly, interview, walk off stage, mosque' - edited by Issykitty
kceaton1>> ^AnimalsForCrackers:

America, land of the freeeee,
with 500 plus channels of less than useless TV
I once was lost but now I squeeeee,
as I now watch the BBC via limey proxy
I agree with the sentimentality, but...why not just by a Tivo/DVR?
/
lampishthingWoot!! Mindless applause at stated opinion that is appealing!>> ^westy:
lol such a piontless argument and just yelling.
these programs are so thick as they dont realy discuss things in anny inteligent way its just random peoples opinoins and they are not evan skilled at exspressing them , what is sad is that when u do have inteligent people weather religouse, insane , or not , they often only get 2 min to say something on the news.
We should have tv programs that are 2-4 hours of structured talking between interlectuals or properly planed debates that would allow an audeance to actualy listen to inteligent arguments give opertunity for people talking to inteligently and clearly rebut what sumone has said.
maby have a good documentry on something thats 60 min allowing an audeance to get a good idea of the issues and then have leaders in the feald debate aspects of the issues at hand.
siftbot3 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
dannym3141>> ^Gallowflak:
@westy
Structured debates between intelligent and articulate people aren't
watchedsomewhere you generally find westy.Zing! Sorry..
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.