Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
9 Comments
siftbotsays...TYT Connecting the dots on Clinton Foundation corruption has been added as a related post - related requested by iaui on that post.
notarobotsays...I don't like Trump. Yet with all that's known about Hillary's corruption, there is no way I could vote for her in good conscience. The democratic party had the opportunity to push forward a fantastic candidate with a spotless record in his public service. Instead, they used backroom deals and underhanded means to thwart democracy. I see no reason to reward such behavior.
As president, Hillary would likely get one or two bills passed improving some kind of social service-improved access to healthcare, or healthy foods or something like that. And the rest of her time will be devoted to enhancing the corporatist agendas of her owners. She is a puppet to those donors.
If I lived the the US (and I don't) I would be deciding between Stein and Johnson.
I see no reason to reward Hillary's corruption with a mandate.
Drachen_Jagersays...With Clinton there will be more elections in four years.
With Trump, that's by no means a guarantee.
If you live in a swing state, do a vote swap with someone who lives in a 'safe' red or blue state. There are vote exchanges online it's easy and free, and the best part is, you don't have to kick yourself for four years (or longer) knowing that your thrown-away vote helped put Trump in charge.
I don't like Trump, but with all that's known about Hillary's corruption, there is not way I could vote for her in good conscience. The democratic party had the opportunity to push forward a fantastic candidate with a spotless record in his public service. Instead, they used backroom deals and underhanded means to thwart democracy. I see no reason to reward such behavior.
As president, Hillary would likely get one or two bills passed improving some kind of social service-improved access to healthcare, or healthy foods or something like that. And the rest of her time will be devoted to enhancing the corporatist agendas of her owners. She is a puppet to those donors.
If I lived the the US (and I don't) I would be deciding between Stein and Johnson.
I see no reason to reward Hillary's corruption with a mandate.
kulpimssays...*quality
siftbotsays...Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by kulpims.
noimssays...America is playing a game. The only way to win is to change the rules.
Nobody in power cares about spoiled votes, non-votes, or third-party votes, unless it's votes for them that are getting wasted.
The goal is to survive with as little damage as possible before the next chance to change the rules.
I'm not American either, but I'd definitely vote against trump, and there's only one way to do that.
I don't like Trump. Yet with all that's known about Hillary's corruption, there is no way I could vote for her in good conscience. The democratic party had the opportunity to push forward a fantastic candidate with a spotless record in his public service. Instead, they used backroom deals and underhanded means to thwart democracy. I see no reason to reward such behavior.
As president, Hillary would likely get one or two bills passed improving some kind of social service-improved access to healthcare, or healthy foods or something like that. And the rest of her time will be devoted to enhancing the corporatist agendas of her owners. She is a puppet to those donors.
If I lived the the US (and I don't) I would be deciding between Stein and Johnson.
I see no reason to reward Hillary's corruption with a mandate.
ChaosEnginesays...So I'm at 3 minutes and Cenk has laid out a (pretty reasonable IMHO) argument about why he's voting Hillary.
Any reason I need to watch the next 16 minutes?
'cos TYT still really needs an editor who understands the word "concise"...
JustSayingsays...I didn't watch the video and I already know who the man's gonna vote.
What's there to decide? Wether you throw away your vote for third party candidates that never had a chance? Might as well stay at home and do nothing. You're not part of the decision making process. Vote Clinton or stay home.
If you don't want to see Trump in the White House, there's only one thing to do. It's not about a choice between several candidates anymore. It doesn't matter if you don't like the other options. The decision is wethere you'll have President Trump or not.
You want Trump? Then vote everything but Clinton.
It's that simple.
So I'm at 3 minutes and Cenk has laid out a (pretty reasonable IMHO) argument about why he's voting Hillary.
Any reason I need to watch the next 16 minutes?
'cos TYT still really needs an editor who understands the word "concise"...
eric3579says...(edit) nevermind
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.