Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
24 Comments
CrushBugsays...Fricken awesome movie
EMPIREsays...Love this movie (i have it on dvd), and I love this speech, and I freaking love Hugo Weaving's Diction!
calvadossays...Tremendous film. The forerunner graphic novel (ie., comic book), from the 1980s, is also v. good (and explains how V blasted his way out of Larkhill, which was a sweet subplot but probably would have slowed the film's tempo).
Mind you, author Alan Moore greatly disliked the film: "[The movie] has been "turned into a Bush-era parable by people too timid to set a political satire in their own country.... It's a thwarted and frustrated and largely impotent American liberal fantasy of someone with American liberal values standing up against a state run by neoconservatives—which is not what the comic V for Vendetta was about. It was about fascism, it was about anarchy, it was about England."[9] --from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V_for_Vendetta#Film
Memoraresays..."I'm as mad as hell, and I'm not going to take this anymore!"
k8_fansays...Alan Moore can get stuffed. If it had been made while Thatcher was still in power, they could have made the original film. But I suspect he's like Christopher Tolkien, and nothing other than the original book would be acceptable. Sorry, but there were aspects of the original work, like Prothero's doll collection, that would have been unintentional moments of hilarity. He's like those Lord of the Rings fans who hate Jackson's films because Tom Bombidill was dropped.
loorissays...The movie was great, but the comic was so much superior.
Yes, yes, i'm not saying it was easy to adapt it. I'm plainly and simply stating the comic was better, no more no less.
Zifnabsays...I'm with you looris
loorissays...
Fedquipsays...*promote
siftbotsays...Promoting this classic video back to the front page; last published Saturday, April 28th, 2007 5:26am PDT - promote requested by Fedquip.
Zifnabsays...Thanks for the promote Fedquip
jwraysays...*promote
siftbotsays...Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Monday, November 5th, 2007 1:08am PST - promote requested by jwray.
jwraysays...This is a great speech except for the historical inaccuracy of its interpretation of Guy Fawkes.
Guy Fawkes wasn't for religious freedom, he was for replacing the Protestant establishment of religion with a Catholic establishment of religion.
Or at least that's what I've read. It could be slander.
SDGundamXsays...>> ^jwray:
This is a great speech except for the historical inaccuracy of its interpretation of Guy Fawkes.
Guy Fawkes wasn't for religious freedom, he was for replacing the Protestant establishment of religion with a Catholic establishment of religion.
Or at least that's what I've read. It could be slander.
I believe you are correct, sir: http://www.videosift.com/video/Guy-Fawkes-and-the-Gunpowder-Plot
siftbotsays...Tags for this video have been changed from 'alan, moore, hugo, weaving, wachowski' to 'alan, moore, hugo, weaving, wachowski, rebellion, terrorism' - edited by jwray
siftbotsays...Tags for this video have been changed from 'alan, moore, hugo, weaving, wachowski, rebellion, terrorism' to 'alan, moore, hugo, weaving, wachowski, opression, rebellion, terrorism' - edited by jwray
radxsays...*Quality clip, all around outstanding performance by Mr. Weaving.
siftbotsays...Boosting this quality contribution up in the Hot Listing - declared quality by radx.
westysays...The movie had the potential to be good but the editing was horrendous, the movie also came across as needlessly protentois , or trying hard to be intellectual wheals actually being quite simplistic.
films like 1984 do things alot better , fare enough this is a comic book type film , but in that case i think it be better if they had made it far more colorful and abstract.
NetRunnersays...I just watched the movie for the first time tonight. I liked it. I found the ending in particular to be quite satisfying.
It once again makes me jealous of nations with histories that extend back for thousands of years. It's kinda scary that contemporary Britons are still burning the guy in effigy, even though the whole dispute over which he was going to commit the crime has long since passed.It wasn't as deep or cerebral as I was expecting, but ultimately that worked in its favor (as far as I'm concerned), I wasn't particularly in the mood for a dark, cerebral film tonight.
I love the little ditty:
ctrlaltbleachsays...*dead
siftbotsays...This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by ctrlaltbleach.
siftbotsays...The thumbnail image for this video has been updated - thumbnail added by vaporlock.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.