A legal analysis of the recent supreme court decision granting presidential immunity.

<sigh>

His post-rant analysis on Nebula also makes a good point that if this were to get used by, say, Biden, the supreme court can just as easily roll back the decision saying that whatever he did actually didn't constitute an official act.
bobknight33says...

SCOTUS upheld what always been. Acts done with in POTUS authority are immune from prosecution. Acts done outside of POTUS authority can be criminal and prostituted. Nothing changed nothing added nothing removed.
From the SCOTUS ruling " the dissents position in the end boil down ignoring the Constitution's separation of powers and the Courts precedent and instead fear mongering of extreme hypotheticals.

newtboysays...

Label Trump a danger to America, a terrorist leader of a terrorist organization (he absolutely undeniably is one) then it’s an official act. Immune!

He won’t, because Joe is an honorable moral man…which is truly a pity because it is blatantly obvious that the felon rapist will absolutely abuse this power and murder citizens and politicians he finds objectionable, because he has no honor, morals, or scruples.

bobknight33said:

So then have JOE Kill Orange man.

HE can't because this guy is bull shit and Joe would go to jail.

newtboysays...

WRONG.
The invalid and corrupt SCOTUS changed the law to make “official acts” by one person, the president, above the law, can’t even be scrutinized…which has NEVER been the case, indeed our government was designed to avoid exactly that. NO MAN IS ABOVE THE LAW has been the American motto since its inception. That creed has now been invalidated by this unfathomable decision which adds the asterisk “*except the president when acting officially” while intentionally leaving open the question of what is an official act and what isn’t, allowing for uneven, unequal, inconsistent application based on politics or payoffs, not law or facts.

They did say acts by the POTUS in or outside their authority can be prostituted…legalizing bribery so long as the policy change comes before the final check. A Freudian slip you got correct. That was another change this extremist court just made.

Once again since you cannot read or comprehend what you’ve been told repeatedly, the position was not fear mongering about hypotheticals, it was pointing out the specific anti democratic crimes already committed and those promised by one candidate in their campaign of retribution against the non cultists…the exact examples brought up during arguement that were just determined to be legal, like the assassination of a political rival by the military. That is not hypothetical now, they ruled on it precisely.

LIAR.

No President has ever needed immunity for official acts before Trump because none ever tried to commit felonies then hide behind their authority as president (Nixon tried, but like Trump his crimes were definitely unofficial acts not official no matter how he tried to make them official, not presidential orders but campaign activities just like the coup, but he had the moral fortitude to step down and go away, Trump would rather burn it all down.)

Explain why Trump needs immunity if he didn’t commit crimes.

bobknight33said:

SCOTUS upheld what always been. Acts done with in POTUS authority are immune from prosecution. Acts done outside of POTUS authority can be criminal and prostituted. Nothing changed nothing added nothing removed.
From the SCOTUS ruling " the dissents position in the end boil down ignoring the Constitution's separation of powers and the Courts precedent and instead fear mongering of extreme hypotheticals.

bobknight33says...

Joe Showered with his daughter.
Joe sniff girls.
Joe legislation has put more Blacks in Jail.
Joe does not care about blacks, just their votes.



newtboysaid:

Joe is an honorable moral man…which is truly a pity because it is blatantly obvious that the felon rapist will absolutely abuse this power and murder citizens and politicians he finds objectionable, because he has no honor, morals, or scruples.

newtboysays...

“WAAAH WAAAH WAAAH….JOE’S A DOODIE HEAD WITH A SMELLY BUTT! Why won’t anybody believe me, I’m super cereal you guys!”
It’s because every accusation is an admission, but we knew he showered and more with Ivanka, we knew he sniffed and leered and groped poor Miss Teen USA contestants and others, we know he tried to charge anyone marching with BLM as a terrorist, we all remember how he called for the death penalty or lynching of the Central Park 5 and when they were exonerated he doubled down and said he still thought they should die because they did something (he knows it….they’re BLACK!) and should be put to death as an example if not for a crime, and we know he’s a lifelong hard core racist that redlines, accepted an endorsement from the KKK as a generational legacy member, who promotes White Christian Nationalism, and that uses minorities but has never treated then fairly much less with care…”they’re rapists, they’re murderers….I’m sure some are ok but not most”.

The baseless accusations…All pure fantasy, unlike the MOUNTAINS OF SWORN STATEMENTS AND EVIDENCE PROVING THAT DONALD JOHN TRUMP RAPED A 13 YEAR OLD GIRL (who looked like his 13 year old daughter we know he lusts for because he says it constantly) REPEATEDLY IN 1994 WITH HIS PARTNER, EPSTEIN…then hung out for 15 years daily while Epstein ran a child prostitution ring…and Trump 100% knew.

No people is so dumb they don’t see who works to include them in the American dream and who works to exclude them. The vote record bears this out. You believe “blacks” are all too dumb to understand and vote against their own interests by 85%, your “black outreach” is predicated on the trope that black people are stupid, uneducated, criminal, and only respond to flashy immoral garbage and criminality so clearly they’ll love a felonious rapist in gold high tops.

bobknight33said:

Joe Showered with his daughter.
Joe sniff girls.
Joe legislation has put more Blacks in Jail.
Joe does not care about blacks, just their votes.

siftbotsays...

Moving this video to noims's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More