How could a drug which is proven to be dehydrating when taken ONCE be any safer then a drug which has no known harmful sideeffects unless it's delivered in extremely high concentration or taken over a immense period of time.

I don't get how extacy can be the "safest drug around" ( i know there is "Kaht" but this does not seem to be a drug) or why cannabis should be more "dangerous" then LSD because of its psychological effects. (yea right)

Part 3 seems to be missing in the playlist - it jumps from 13 (4MTA) to 8 (Amphetamines).

>> ^srd:

Part 3 seems to be missing in the playlist - it jumps from 13 (4MTA) to 8 (Amphetamines).


I've no idea why it's doing that, the playlist is intact up until the point I get the embed code

Part 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZ0C4Vx4Jyg&p=672F4B8E67704B71

It probably turned passive aggressive because of all the conflicting highs in its innards... Hrm, watching this reminds me of the Tamagothi.


Edit: Ah, it seems that part 3 is tagged for ages 18 and over, thus not being available for people not logged in to youtube. Lets see what morally questionable deviant acts are performed in there...

No meth?

>> ^geo321:

No meth?


As far as I know, meth is very rare over here... for now

"People are always going to alter their consciousness... Rather than forbid, we need to educate."

*dead

This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by eric3579.

Awarding eric3579 with one Power Point for fixing this video's dead embed code.