I think HAL won

This one was particularly good. *promote

Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Thursday, June 14th, 2012 4:03pm PDT - promote requested by shuac.

Hahaha. I lost it at "I'm on Linux bitch, I thought you GNU."

Oh dear spaghetti monster, what have I become...

Awesome, except "I'm running C++" which doesn't make sense, strictly speaking. (You can run binary code compiled from C++ source code, but you can't run C++ itself.)

My finger was on the downvote button, waiting for a Steve Jobs fellatio fest... pleasantly surprised. Funny!

The only problem with HAL, is that, well we all know he looks like he is actually a street lamp sticking out of a Atari 2600...

I had to say it. Not fear inducing exactly.

(But, that was the point...)

>> ^lucky760:

Awesome, except "I'm running C++" which doesn't make sense, strictly speaking. (You can run binary code compiled from C++ source code, but you can't run C++ itself.)


You could run a compiler, which I believe would qualify as "running C++" if only on a technicality.

Yeah, they got a majority of it right, so I'll give that minor flub to them. Also, glad to see Linux got an appearance.
>> ^AeroMechanical:

>> ^lucky760:
Awesome, except "I'm running C++" which doesn't make sense, strictly speaking. (You can run binary code compiled from C++ source code, but you can't run C++ itself.)

You could run a compiler, which I believe would qualify as "running C++" if only on a technicality.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

Loved it.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

Fruity Loops http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FL_Studio
Looks a lot like Logic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_Studio

>> ^dag:

Fruity Loops http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FL_Studio
Looks a lot like Logic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_Studio


And Fruity Loops is ten years older than Logic.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

Are you implying that Apple would copy the UI from another software vendor? That's unpossible.>> ^direpickle:

>> ^dag:
Fruity Loops http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FL_Studio
Looks a lot like Logic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_Studio

And Fruity Loops is ten years older than Logic.

>> ^dag:

Are you implying that Apple would copy the UI from another software vendor? That's unpossible.>> ^direpickle:
>> ^dag:
Fruity Loops http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FL_Studio
Looks a lot like Logic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_Studio

And Fruity Loops is ten years older than Logic.



Haha, sorry. I kinda thought you were trying to imply the opposite, for a moment.

Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)

http://blog.videosift.com/dag/Apple-Fanboy-Since-1983
>> ^direpickle:

>> ^dag:
Are you implying that Apple would copy the UI from another software vendor? That's unpossible.>> ^direpickle:
>> ^dag:
Fruity Loops http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FL_Studio
Looks a lot like Logic.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Logic_Studio

And Fruity Loops is ten years older than Logic.


Haha, sorry. I kinda thought you were trying to imply the opposite, for a moment.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh-mwjF-OMo for the behind the scenes.