Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
9 Comments
siftbotsays...Moving this video to Barseps's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.
siftbotsays...4 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
JiggaJonsonsays...*promote but I still think my title is better. :-p
siftbotsays...Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Saturday, November 12th, 2011 7:28pm PST - promote requested by JiggaJonson.
gwiz665says...The other one wasn't a dupe.
bareboards2says...@lucky760, this shouldn't have happened. This 10 minute vid now has a backup embed that is only 90 seconds long. The dupe process happened all the way, instead of the shorter clip getting discarded.
@JiggaJonson and @Boise_Lib, welcome to the complexity that is now isduping.
>> ^siftbot:
4 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.
JiggaJonsonsays...Yeah @bareboards2 @gwiz665 it's kind of my fault b/c I should have actually watched the other video, but then I complained to @Boise_Lib who initially marked it a dupe. He had the following to say:
"I just went by the FAQ:
If a newer submission's video is a clip of content found within an existing post, it will be considered a duplicate unless it meets both these criteria:
The original post is at least 15 minutes in length
The original post is at least 3 times longer than the clip"
So I can't blame him either, but I already communicated to him, and I think to lucky, that I'm going to make a poll about changing the dupe rules in teh FAQ once his powerpoint ticker poll is down, so we can hopefully straighten this out.
p.s. my clip was awesome'r and had a bitchin'r title.
bareboards2says...@Boise_Lib left off a crucial bit on the written dupe guidelines. The last line:
"If a duplicate cannot adequately be considered an exact or reasonable replacement of the original, it should be * discarded."
So when the shorter vid was noted as being a dupe according to the mathematical guidelines (very very specific), then the "duping" poster "had" to discard their own video.
Poor @lucky760. So sick of dupe conversations.
My frustration is that we had a sift poll. 33-8.
http://videosift.com/poll/What-is-a-dupe Clear consensus, massively one-sided vote. And it was ignored in favor of mathematical precision, which hasn't helped.
It's just videos. It's just videos. It's just videos. My mantra.
>> ^JiggaJonson:
Yeah @bareboards2 @gwiz665 it's kind of my fault b/c I should have actually watched the other video, but then I complained to @Boise_Lib who initially marked it a dupe. He had the following to say:
"I just went by the FAQ:
If a newer submission's video is a clip of content found within an existing post, it will be considered a duplicate unless it meets both these criteria:
The original post is at least 15 minutes in length
The original post is at least 3 times longer than the clip"
So I can't blame him either, but I already communicated to him, and I think to lucky, that I'm going to make a poll about changing the dupe rules in teh FAQ once his powerpoint ticker poll is down, so we can hopefully straighten this out.
p.s. my clip was awesome'r and had a bitchin'r title.
messengersays...Why did Jimmy get probation? What was his crime?
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.