1 vid on acct @ YT 2hrs old=*ban

leelee has been nominated for banination by chicchorea. This may be due to abuse or violations of the posting guidelines. If this nomination is seconded, the account will be permanently disabled.

can't *dead

Well, yes, but over 77 views there...and @leelee 's account here is 7 days old. It seems odd to created a profile just to post this video, but somehow 7 days before the video was posted at YT. Hmmmm.....
I'll just ask....@leelee , is this your video on YT?

yeah it's a real mystery lol
he just happened upon the only vid on that yt account within 2 hours of creation and decided to share it with us.
lol, yeah ok

Maybe yes, maybe no.
Because the sift account is a week old, but the YT account is only 2 hours old, it's possible.
I'm just thinking we shouldn't ban people based on a quick guess.
Maybe he/she was looking at road rage videos on YT and that one came up? I might have sifted a video that was just posted on a new YT account in the past...but I've never posted a video at YT, but by your criteria I might have been banned anyway. (I'm sure there are some here that wish I was!)

If the sift account was younger than the video, I wouldn't have doubt, but since it's a week older than the video/YT account, I do have a reasonable doubt.

It's LIKELY it's their vid...but not definite...at least to me. If it's certain to you, ban! I'm not stopping anyone, just giving my reason for not seconding.

I appreciate the sentiment, @newtboy, but that's enough evidence this is just spam (according to our posting guidelines).

*ban

CC: @eric3579

leelee has been seconded for banination by lucky760. This account will now be disabled. If you would like to appeal this banination, leelee, you may contact the administrators.