Video Flagged Dead
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
23 Comments
benjeesays...An excellent debate (by Dawkins & Ben) on an utterly crap christian Sunday morning show.
siftbotsays...Expired in Queue (4 day limit)
benjeesays...*save
siftbotsays...Saving this video from queue deletion, sending it to the top of the queue for one more try. Originally submitted on Sunday 24th December 2006 (save called by gold star member benjee)
mitirapasays...That guy just dosen't get it that science was never, and is not, meant to be a replacement to religion. Yes, science dosen't provide a moral philosophy, but Dawkins's whole argument about 'cherry-picking' is that neither does the Bible.
imstellar28says...Wow Dawkins is a genius, he just proved that the Bible provides no moral code to society. Its not explicit, but as Dawkins mentions the very act of "cherry-picking" that people do with the bible--that is they choose to believe in the "good" parts and ignore the "bad" parts is a moral code in itself independent of the bible.
Most proponents of religion when backed into a corner always respond with...well...so maybe God doesn't exist but at least religion provides instruction for people on how to live good lives, but Dawkins has effortlessly proved this false!
For those interested in Dawkins or religion/evolution read "The Blind Watchmaker" its a brilliant book that I guarantee will open your eyes at least a couple times per chapter.
BoneyDsays...Thanks for the save benjee! <3
Yes, I was quite happy to hear that when he pointed it out. It's nice to know it's something built-in to our very nature. Sort of empowering, eh?
jonnysays...*dead
siftbotsays...This published video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by jonny.
siftbotsays...Awarding kronosposeidon with one Power Point for fixing this video's dead embed code.
siftbotsays...Tags for this video have been changed from 'richard dawkins, tony ben, morality' to 'richard dawkins, tony benn, morality, sunday edition' - edited by kronosposeidon
kronosposeidonsays...*talks *1sttube *religion
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (1sttube, Religion, Talks) - requested by kronosposeidon.
kronosposeidonsays...*promote
siftbotsays...Promoting this video back to the front page; last published Thursday, April 5th, 2007 3:48pm PDT - promote requested by kronosposeidon.
chilaxesays...It's not true that science doesn't teach us values.
bluecliffsays...how can you trust anyone who visits these horrible little shows, makes me sick
shuacsays...Who said anything about values? I believe they were discussing moral guidance. Neither religion nor science teach moral guidance but only science makes the claim of never trying to.
chilaxesays...^His claim was that science doesn't 'tell us how to live,' which isn't true.
shuacsays...Disagree.
gwiz665says...I would argue that these are not moral values, but of course you are right - they are values in the way that they are methods with which to perceive and act in the world. Chiefly above all the points you quoted stands truth. The rest springs from there. The great scientific value is that truth = good. If you disregard truth, you are not being scientific. Other than that, I wouldn't say that science judges any action like a religion does: "X is WRONG/bad" or "Y is RIGHT/good".
>> ^chilaxe:
It's not true that science doesn't teach us values.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Association_fallacy
>> ^bluecliff:
how can you trust anyone who visits these horrible little shows, makes me sick
jonnysays...*dead
siftbotsays...This video has been declared non-functional; embed code must be fixed within 2 days or it will be sent to the dead pool - declared dead by jonny.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.