When you got to Piers for your journalism, you get what you expect.

I'm pro gun control. And I'm getting tired of every argument getting smacked down by morons going "It won't work" or "Tried it." No it won't work if we don't give it a chance. Yes we've tried a lame version of something and we should give a new and better version a chance to work. No one is asking people in Law enforcement about this stuff, except Jon Stewart who had a new york commissioner on his show. Everyone just quotes something they don't understand and whines.

Shut up Gun nuts, we're trying something. Shut up peaceniks, you're not always right. Let's try to figure this shit out instead of just giving the fuck up.

Every sane person have the right to own a gun. But as Jon said, we need to change the way we perceive guns. They should be like dad's nazi dishes ("American Beauty" reference): nice to look at, safe kept and used on special occasions.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Why wasting billions and billions of dollars on cancer and HIV research. There is a very long failing history.

Who you calling a moron anyhow? What's gun control mean?
Shut up?? What in a fiddler's fistfuck are you talking about?
*sarcasm?

What are you smoking or injecting? I want some!!

Chingalera you keep getting on your soap box about this issue. Drop it already, you don't need an M-16 to protect yourself.

What is the point of the issue? You don't have or care to have a clue making a comment like that. It's called current-affairs and having a cunt for a president in my country, what planet are you on?

Moving this video to chingalera's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Piers Morgan and Ted Nugent?
Talk about the inane debating the insane....

Shouldn't that old fart be "in jail or dead" by now?

In jail for what, disagreeing with your point of view? You're a good little progressive.

Update: SB808 by Sen. Kevin de Leon, D-Los Angeles: Saw this guy's ineloquent (seriously flawed use of the English language, no semantic skills whatsoever) press conference announcing this attempt by California to create another fantasy law concerning "ghost guns."

Here's the tool's entire diatribe as California try's another vain attempt to reign-in a police state.

And you're an ignorant little conservative.

@9547bis wasn't suggesting that Nugent should be in jail, that was Nugent himself when he claimed he would be "dead or in jail if Obama is re-elected"

16 months later, he's yet to fulfill his bullshit promise.

Ah...people say things...like you, and it doesn't mean anything.

Don't worry, I've never thought anything Nugent ever said meant anything.

2 fucking morons with zero capability to understand a mildly complex issue.

So in Nugents mind, you don't need to be polite unless all people has guns? "Armed society is polite society" not to mention "scared out of their mind society". The more i hear gun nuts defending their right, it sounds more and more "cause i want to" rather than "we need to". I live in a country that was the last hunter gatherers in europe, we got longer hunting tradition than USA has been a country. There's strict gun control, every gun is registered and no one can sell them to a person who hasn't been licensed. That means basic training, belonging to a hunting club, clean(ish) record, meaning no violent crimes. And no on has complained about it.. Why? cause it simply works. Guns are where they should be, in sporting and hunting. The last priority is home protection. Getting an illegal, proper working gun is expensive as hell. Sawed off shotgun can go for a thousand, not 50 bucks. The result? Very few crimes are committed with a gun, very very few resulting in actual gunfire. It bloody well works.

How are violent crimes committed and what is used against home invasion? Bats, axes and knifes. At least the struggle become fairer and you seriously have to mean it when you can't kill someone 10m away. You have to be hands on, in their getting bloody, mixing your DNA all over the place.. See where i'm going with this? With a gun, you can kill someone in safety and have less chances of getting caught. Every act of violent crime leaves two sets of evidence, victim and perpetrator can be both identified later. With a gun you got a victim and a bullet from unknown, unregistered gun that is disposed soon after since it's freaking easy and cheap to just buy a new one..

The whole idea of not supporting background check and leaving guns in the wild is just moronic and has nothing to do with government knowing who has guns and abusing that power. It has all to do with "cause i want to have one".

I'll bet you live in a country that doesn't have a black, inner-city, violent subculture that mixes guns and drugs, too.