Adding video to channels (Kids) - requested by ant.

I MUST SPEAK REALLY LOUDLY, OR MY DOG WILL NOT HEAR ME! SIT UBU SIT! GOOD DOG!

On a more genuine note...not kids...*nochannel *cute *pets

This video has been removed from all channels (Pets, Kids, Cute) due to invalid channel assignment - nochannel invoked by Lawdeedaw. Please review the FAQ to learn about appropriate channel assignments.

Adding video to channels (Cute, Pets) - requested by Lawdeedaw.

I disagree. I think it's the one time @ant has used the *kids channel appropriately. He usually adds it to a video anytime a kid is in the video (along with many others).

"This is a realm for videos that are suitable for children to enjoy."
http://videosift.com/kids

Adding video to channels (Kids) - requested by eric3579.

Just curious as to why? I mean cute dogs have nothing to do with kids--on any level. Adults enjoy the dog crap out of them just as much. Cartoons, sure. But only some. This is kid void but meh.

I agree that adults enjoy it as much as kids, but that has no bearing on it being a valid choice for the channel. It fits the definition of the channel ("suitable for children to enjoy"). The only reason i made a point was because, it was the ONE time ant got it right, when it comes to adding the kids channel. You would be surprised at how many times hes had sifters personally define the kids channel for him. Not that any of it matters really. Many videos are assigned to the wrong channels as defined. The whole thing's a cluster fuck. I say we scrap any channel that is not obvious (in definition) by the word used to denote the channel. Annnnddd now im just rambling.

The video is entirely appropriate for the shorter crowd, and is not out of place in that channel. It doesn't need to have been made specifically for children to be suitable for them to enjoy.