Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
10 Comments
Zawashsays...*controversy
siftbotsays...Invocations (controversy) cannot be called by Zawash because Zawash is not privileged - sorry.
Dumdeedumsays...Blah blah terrible, agreed, but I can never listen properly to TotalBiscuit because he insists on talking in that cheesy radio DJ voice that even DJs don't use anymore.
RFlaggsays...Some people can't take criticism. Especially bad when you got proof they gave permission before you made the video, and aren't doing things equally.
Some of the channels I watch are critical of Young Earth Creationists, proving how the YEC people are providing false witness by lying about the actual facts in an effort to confuse their audience into believing the Earth is only 6,000 year old, and they get take down notices all the time. In those cases it is fair use at play since the channels they are being shown on aren't getting revenue, and are educational. In TB's case, he had permission from the company, signed by the very guy who later complained.
As TB notes, this isn't really about him and his video though, but others who do the same thing who don't have a powerful network behind them to recover or fight, and has more to do with YouTube's default action, without giving proper recourse for the content maker to address it fairly, and of course the DMCA itself which is probably the core of the problem. Hopefully, if any of the videos he pointed out as still being up are taken down after he pointed them out, his Network will help those people.
The subject of Let's Play videos and their legality is a difficult one. TB's WTF videos are basically Let's Play with an initial impression. Even without a blanket and specific permission granted, they should be legal, as it is critique, not just a pure Let's Play without commentary of the entire game. I can see the argument against showing a large portion or entire game and monetizing it without permission, but a shorter Let's Play or critique should be fair, especially critique.
It should be noted that the Developers have since pulled their complaint to YouTube after the negative publicity. Gee... take down notice to one of the biggest YouTube game reviewers out there, somebody who's professional name and reputation is "cynical" and you don't think there would be fallout?
Ohmmadesays...Simples.
Disable comments on your YT channel, but have a forum on your companies website for actual players.
CreamKsays...Not uncommon. Game companies can be very touchy of negative feedback. Some games go to great lengths to limit any kind of negative responses banning people, trying to shut people up in 3rd party sites too.
entr0pysays...The video's back, the developer relented and apologized. Here it is if you're curious.
http://youtu.be/KjTa_x3rbJE
noimsjokingly says...If I were Barbara Streisand I'd sue that games company for breach of copyright of her idea.
Zawashsays...*controversy
siftbotsays...Adding video to channels (Controversy) - requested by Zawash.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.