frickin' youtube doubler long ass embed code....

*promote

Promoting this video and sending it back into the queue for one more try; last queued Friday, November 4th, 2011 1:32am PDT - promote requested by geo321.

http://videosift.com/video/Did-you-just-misunderstand-Gary-Oldman

^But that video has so many words. Mine only has one. *notadupe.org.com

Wasn't suggesting a dupe, I voted for it and everything

if'n that ain't *brief

then i don't rightly know what is.

Video is already flagged brief - ignoring brief request by my15minutes.

then why ain't i seein' the flag, sifty?

ignore me, will ya? friggin' tin can.

I'm not paranoid. Who ever said I was paranoid? Why is everyone calling me paranoid? >> ^alien_concept:

Wasn't suggesting a dupe, I voted for it and everything

*dupeof=http://videosift.com/video/Did-you-just-misunderstand-Gary-Oldman

This video has been nominated as a duplicate of this video by BoneRemake. If this nomination is seconded with *isdupe, the video will be killed and its votes transferred to the original.

Dont be lame. Maybe if I post him saying

" EVERY "

I could get ten votes and another star point !

Do it. >> ^BoneRemake:

Dont be lame. Maybe if I post him saying
" EVERY "
I could get ten votes and another star point !

As much as I agree with you, our Fearless Leader changed the definition of a dupe and codified it in writing. Emphasis added.

"If a newer submission's video is a clip of content found within an existing post, it will be considered a duplicate unless it meets both these criteria:

The original post is at least 15 minutes in length
The original post is at least 3 times longer than the clip

If a duplicate cannot adequately be considered an exact or reasonable replacement of the original, it should be *discarded."

That last line is to prevent bad back-up embeds.

So this dupe process can't continue without screwing up the backup embed, and so it falls to dft to discard it.

For the record, I think this stinks. We had a Sift Talk with overwhelming support that a dupe is an exact duplicate. This was over-ridden by the Power That Is (Lucky on his own) when someone ignored that Sift Talk vote and called dupe on something that clearly wasn't a dupe.

I understand why Lucky did it, I think -- I think he did it because he was sick to death of all the squabbling over the definition of a dupe, so he just laid down the law.

So, dft, you "have" to discard this video. Or -- start a Sift Talk about it. Or pull this vid into discuss. Which is pretty ironic, given that Lucky wrote those rules just so he wouldn't have to listen to us squabble anymore.

As if the Sift could exist without squabbling.....



>> ^dystopianfuturetoday:

^But that video has so many words. Mine only has one. notadupe.org.com

Only the original submitter of a post may discard it unless the submitter is banned - ignoring discard request by bareboards2.

This video, sweet man.

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/230769

@BoneRemake.

>> ^bareboards2:

http://www.tubechop.com/watch/230769
@BoneRemake.


I am not that much of a jack ass. 3 seconds is enough of that.

Did you just misunderstand Gary Oldman? has been added as a related post - related requested by Zawash on that post.

4 more comments have been lost in the ether at this killed duplicate.