Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
9 Comments
Fjnbksays...Why on earth is this man not manning a weather station in Guam? I thought bureaucratic incompetence was dealt with that way.
RedSkysays...Get your tin foil hats out kids!
dagsays...Comment hidden because you are ignoring dag.(show it anyway)
Cue Patsy Cline.
Raaaghsays...uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuummmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
vaporlocksays...Nice tan Brownie...
NetRunnersays...>> ^vaporlock:
Nice tan Brownie...
I think you mean "Heckuva tan, Brownie!"
Golgisays...gj random right wing mouth piece.
Psychologicsays...It seems like the guy is saying:
1. Obama will use the spill to advance his anti-coal & anti-oil agendas.
2. Obama's offshore drilling plans were fairly meager.
Matthews hears:
1. The explosion was intentionally caused to hurt the coal industry.
2. Obama planned for offshore drilling because he knew about (or was involved in?) the rig explosion ahead of time.
Maybe I missed something in the part that was edited out (edit: or statements made in another interview?). I never heard Brown imply anything nearly as crazy as what Matthews said.
Assuming I heard Mr. Suntan correctly, he isn't that far off. Of course Obama will use the disaster to focus more on alternative energy (not so sure about the bankrupting coal part), and his drilling plans were fairly limited compared to Republican ideas.
Were those points intended as insults? They don't sound that bad.
mxxconsays...>> ^RedSky:
Get your tin foil hats out kids!
don't listen to him kids ! Obama is financed by the tin foil industry!
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.