It’s ok @bobknight33…we know that 1) you would never watch this and 2) the precise language, specific terms, and legal citation would go so far over your head that you couldn’t see them
The defense judge subverted the law and Justice to protect one man for purely political reasons. Nothing could be more obvious. You applaud this politically motivated degradation of the law and long standing checks and balances our government is founded on…nothing could be less surprising.

Judge DISMISSED Trump's Classified Docs Case has been added as a related post - related requested by newtboy on that post.

@newtboy.

Smith got kicked to the curb because he was not ligit. As stated by the Federal laws and Supreme court writings.

Improperly appointed Smith got the case dismissed.

The case can be re tried with a proper appointed counsel.

@newtboy
You so full of shit newt. I did watch. I presented such.



This clown video points to 4 paragraphs to "prove" and opine his BS and leads fools like you to buy it

I provide the actual Judges decision use to show Jacks Smith improper appointment.

This allows each of us to decide for our self -- from source material not some ass clown opinion.




I applaud truth - where ever it stands.

No surprise, exactly as predicted it did all go so far over your head you didn’t see it….or even more likely, you didn’t watch it at all.

Federal laws have upheld special councils exactly like Smith, appointed the same way, and that has been upheld in dozens of cases including some at the Supreme Court. No ruling or law changed that, a note from Thomas is what you are referencing, not a decision or ruling….that doesn’t change the law or precedent.
This is one partial compromised unqualified judges ruling, and like her others will be reversed as soon as the 11th convenes, possibly without the need for a hearing it’s so obviously completely unsupportable by any case law…probably why she didn’t cite any.
The case will continue with Smith, and is continuing under appeal.

If special councils are illegal, you agree Biden’s case should be tossed, right? His special council was appointed the same way. I disagree, but I hope he abuses the misinterpretation just to see you lose it.

In the unlikely case that it reaches the completely compromised and sold to the highest bidder Supreme Court and they rule against their own repeatedly codified precedent AGAIN, it can be retried with a normal prosecutor using all the evidence gathered…unless the felon is elected and pardons himself.

Once again, his defense is “there’s a technicality in the law that should let me free” not”I didn’t do the crimes” not even “that’s not a crime” anymore…he’s on to the final last ditch escape attempt…”the law doesn’t apply to me, and trying to make it apply is illegal!”.

You watched it? I doubt it. Presented such? What did you present? A statement based on no facts and one “judge” whose every actual decision has been overturned? (That’s why all the “paperless orders”…they aren’t decisions that could be appealed)

He points to 4 paragraphs of laws that each present legal basis for special prosecutors assigned by the AG (and other department heads, and congress). That’s 4 times he proved her wrong when she said there’s no basis to legally appoint them. He also pointed to multiple cases where those statutes were SUCCESSFULLY used to defend special prosecutors appointments, some that went to the Supreme Court, including Nixon’s. There are no cases where a court has found their appointment to be illegal…except this one by Cannon. That’s why I don’t think you watched.

You provided no such decision. You posted a moron in his mommy’s basement giving his opinion as he skips through the pages and reads tweets from the likes of parking lot lawyer Alina Habba.
It’s 90 pages long. Show me where you did in readable form without some morons head over half the page, I’ll gladly read it in its entirety knowing ahead of time exactly what it’s lacking, citation or precedent, and what it is omitting, a sane reading of at least 4 laws covering the appointment of special counsel by the AG and acceptance of over 50 years of precedent including the Nixon case where he also challenged the appointment but lost.
I know for certain with your English skills you wouldn’t understand half of the first paragraph without someone explaining slowly.

You have never applauded truth, you cannot ever recognize it and shun it with eyes and ears closed when it’s forced on you….you have still never once retracted a single one of the thousands of lies you’ve spread…like the disgusting lie you gleefully told as often as possible when an elderly man survived an assasination attempt and you said “No politics involved, no MAGA, Pelosi was attacked by his own boyfriend”. You meant it. It was a politically motivated assassination attempt by a Trumpist Qanon believer, now convicted. You still stick with the lie.
You never will retract any of your lies because you and your ilk HATE truth and only deal in lies, because you sir are a liar, plain and simple…a simpleton and a liar.

Moving this video to noims's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

Uh oh…Cannon is now being investigated for judicial malpractice, and 100% of non MAGA lawyers (not just liberals) agree that’s what she did, and should be removed from the bench immediately. That may be the outcome soon…she was counting on a Trump election win and simple pardon end to the case (she knows full well the appeal will win, her decision like every other was a delay tactic and nothing but).

Federal laws legitimize the appointment, you read 4 of them that do. The only Supreme Court writing is a singular dissenting opinion by comprised bought and paid for criminal Justice Thomas…who doesn’t have long on the bench.
Thomas is now terrified because he will be removed for malpractice in January when the complicit criminal MAGA loses its obstruction powers and he is impeached. He also counts on a Trump win to protect his job and power.