Post has been Discarded
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
13 Comments
GeeSussFreeK"Three campers were killed today when they began to pitch their tent..."
heheh Jk
Gun cam footage is one of the view things I seem to have no problem accepting voyeurism about.
moodoniaFAQ: Please do not post pornography or "snuff" films (which we define as the explicit depiction of loss of human life displayed for entertainment).
Note: The presence of human fatality is acceptable and not considered "snuff" if presented as a limited portion of a lengthy educational, informative news report or documentary. Our definition of "snuff" does include but is not exclusive to any short clip in which a human fatality occurs whether or not any victims are actually visible on camera.
Doc_M*discuss
siftbotThis video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - discuss requested by Doc_M.
SarzyWell, it's not technically a "lengthy educational, informative news report or documentary", but I still think this should get a pass for essentially conforming to the spirit of that rule (ie. this clearly isn't meant to titillate or excite anyone).
burdturgler"Our definition of "snuff" does include but is not exclusive to any short clip in which a human fatality occurs whether or not any victims are actually visible on camera."
This is a 54 second clip, the entire content of which revolves exclusively around the taking of human life, and seems to fit squarely in the snuff rule quoted above. Though it may not be for entertainment, the clip provides no other context.
lucky760Clearly snuff (by guidelines and precedence). Sorry Doc_M.
*discard
siftbotDiscarding this post - discard requested by member lucky760.
SarzyLook, I don't mean to stir up trouble, but... well... I see a big bowl of trouble that seems like it needs to be stirred. *discuss
I don't think this is "clearly snuff (by guidelines and precedent)". By guidelines it is ambiguous, it could go either way. But by precedent it seems pretty clear. This video was allowed to stay. So was this one. Those two didn't even have anything redeeming about them, they were simply death for the sake of death. At least this one is showing what's happening in Iraq, a war that -- as much as a lot of us would like to wish it wasn't -- is happening right now.
In the case of the latter clip I linked to, I actually argued against it and was shot down, and that had no value whatsoever, and was no more or less explicit in its depiction of death than this clip.
SarzyHmmm.. *return
siftbotReturning this video from Sift Talk - return requested by Sarzy.
Sarzy*discuss!
siftbotThis video is being sent to Sift Talk for discussion - discuss requested by Sarzy.
Discuss...
Enable JavaScript to submit a comment.