Post has been Discarded

9/11 Video Clips Dan Rather Would Rather Not Show You

Note what the newscaster states at 4:30

As it is written in the PNAC. The Senate must have known that the neocons were wanting a "New Pearl Harbor" so they could push their globalization agenda further much faster.
StukaFoxsays...

5:15 of absolute nothing. Seriously, are you trying to convince us we didn't all see a goddamn huge jetliner run into the World Trade Center because some guy on the street said "it was not airliner, it was bomb". Seriously, is this what you're trying to say?

Constitutional_Patriotsays...

^ No...

What I'm focused on is that the journalist at 4:30 quoted something that several Senators stated that is word for word from the PNAC. I didn't make the video.. I didn't control those people that stated what they thought they saw.

You can look into this however you like but please don't put words in my mouth.

Oh and to say that this is 5 minutes of absolute nothing is blatantly disingenuous on your part. This is recorded history. It means something. Whether you like it or not.

Stormsingersays...

You're making an implication that this was some sort of conspiracy by -our- government, and basing your entire argument on the use of the four words, "a second Pearl Harbor"? Gee, I wonder how often those words might come up in describing an unannounced attack on the US. Pure idiocy...call me if you find something actually interesting.

honkeytonk73says...

^
The US govt would -never- do anything that would harm it's people or their rights? Learn a bit of history my friends..

-open air nuke testing near civilian settlements on US soil.
-LSD experimentation on unaware US soldiers
-syphilis/sterilization experiments on unaware african americans.
-unwarranted imprisonment of US -citizens- of Japanese ancestry.
-paranoid witch hunts of McCarthyism.
-govt endorsed segragation and women's suffrage.
-the fact that the US was -not- settled/based upon 'freedom', but initially built on the backs of slaves.

The list goes on and on.

To question the government is the right of EVERY US citizen. On small issues, to large issues. Put the facts forward and openly and clearly review them. This has -yet- to be done thoroughly and independently. Is the US govt complicit in 9/11? Probably not, but there are serious questions which need to be answered. There are holes in the story and inconsistency abounds. While not surprising is such a large scale event, the facts are/were there, but were conveniently shuffled away and trashed/recycled quite quickly.

I suspect not because of a conspiracy, but rather political cover to hide the government's incompetence. By BOTH parties.

StukaFoxsays...

Oh yes, of course, anyone who doesn't buy into the whole GEORGE BUSH DID 9/11!1! is a delusional sheeple breeder.

Troofers: as a liberal, they embarrass me; as a rationalist, they enrage me; as a human being, they disgust me.

Duckman33says...

>> ^StukaFox:
Oh yes, of course, anyone who doesn't buy into the whole GEORGE BUSH DID 9/11!1! is a delusional sheeple breeder.


Neither I, nor anyone here said anything of the sort. Again, you are putting words into our mouths. Speak for yourself please.

If you don't like the comments we make or the videos we post on the subject, I have a great solution for you. Simply don't watch them, and don't read the comments we make about them and you'll have nothing to be embarrassed, enraged, or disgusted about.

StukaFoxsays...

Duckman33: "Why question the Government? It's easier to wear blinders and believe everything you are told.

No independent thought. Marry and reproduce. Consume. This is your God --> $$."


(...)

Duckman33: Neither I, nor anyone here said anything of the sort.

You Troofers can't even keep your own lies straight when they're right in front of you.

Duckman33says...

>> ^StukaFox:
Duckman33: "Why question the Government? It's easier to wear blinders and believe everything you are told.
No independent thought. Marry and reproduce. Consume. This is your God --> $$."

(...)
Duckman33: Neither I, nor anyone here said anything of the sort.
You Troofers can't even keep your own lies straight when they're right in front of you.


Show me where in the comment I said anything even closely resembling "GEORGE BUSH DID 9/111!1!"

Now you're just trolling.

I have never once said the Government or George Bush was responsible for 9/11. I have only said that there is something fishy going on. And that I don't believe everything they tell me.

I'll say it yet again, quit putting words into my mouth.

ambassdorsays...

I really doubt that the conspiracy theory which claims this was an act caused by the US government used to invade Iraq or whatever motive claimed. Some have said that the US is a country that has invaded and bombed countries with far less extremes means such as bombing them based on their 'principles'. That said, the only thing I find interesting, and probably what people allude to a conspiracy to is that I haven't seen any clear evidence of a plane crash on the Pentagon/Pittsburgh. Then again, I'm not an expert in plane collisions. So who I am to say how/what happened?

Prove me wrong and I'll believe in unicorns, ghosts, bigfoot, the world was created in 7 days... oh wait, you guys believe that too. nevermind.

more lulz on VS please!

NetRunnersays...

I don't particularly understand the lashing out at 9/11 truthers. I don't think at this time they have evidence to back up their claims, but unlike the UFO believers, there's nothing particularly outlandish that they're suggesting.

They lied about WMD and links to Al Qaeda to get us into Iraq, why not lie about the specifics of 9/11 itself?

Given the way the Bushies lapped up the aftermath, it wouldn't surprise me if 9/11 turned out to be done with American help -- possibly even with the President or Vice President's knowledge, or on their order, or on their boss's order (call 'em whatever secret society name ya like).

Nothing in any of that seems impossible to me, and now, 7 years past that event, I find myself much more inclined to believe those outlandish claims than I did 9/12/01.

That said, nothing in this video seems particularly damning to me. The "second Pearl Harbor" comment being said by "some Senators" is no surprise, the entire Republican party gets talking points fed to them on every topic, and PNAC had people embedded in the press (William Kristol), and the White House (Donald Rumsfeld) that were eager to frame the attack in that way: a surprise attack that leads to a long, globally scoped military conflict.

Music to the Military-Industrial complex's ears.

cybrbeastsays...

>> ^ambassdor:
That said, the only thing I find interesting, and probably what people allude to a conspiracy to is that I haven't seen any clear evidence of a plane crash on the Pentagon/Pittsburgh. Then again, I'm not an expert in plane collisions. So who I am to say how/what happened?


Here are pictures of wreckage at the Pentagon.
http://www.rense.com/general32/phot.htm

I'm sure it was planes. However I'm not sure if there is no conspiracy. I think it's possible that the government suppressed or ignored intelligence. Maybe even demolished WTC 7.

Send this Article to a Friend



Separate multiple emails with a comma (,); limit 5 recipients






Your email has been sent successfully!

Manage this Video in Your Playlists




notify when someone comments
X

This website uses cookies.

This website uses cookies to improve user experience. By using this website you consent to all cookies in accordance with our Privacy Policy.

I agree
  
Learn More