The major issue i find with this program is that the host did not clearly give all the theorists an indication to voice their concerns and beliefs about the events of 9/11 to each expert interviewee which they faced, this could have helped explain to them why their beliefs really hold no water. The host should have said "If you have any issue, uncertainty or objection to what is being said state it now otherwise stay silent", but instead when faced with the facts they only voiced opposition when they were back on the bus with each other, as they KNEW they could win that battle & if they acted that way towards the expert, they would quickly get a verbal smack-down in public.

Emily Louise Church who featured in the programme has this to say about her experience and the Biased Broadcasting Corporations editing. http://theglobalawakening.wordpress.com/2011/09/09/911-roadtrip-my-perspective-by-emily-louise-church-on-friday-09-september-2011-at-0327/

Moving this video to Fade's personal queue. It failed to receive enough votes to get sifted up to the front page within 2 days.

*beg

Sending this video to Beggar's Canyon to plea for a little attention - beg requested by original submitter Fade.

A mute called "hit piece" onnit, I was going to respond to the "major isssue" the-nemisis mentioned above to remind him of the subjective spin, edit edit editing in order to direct the viewer-There are formulas, this iz, the purpose of television-

All beliefs hold water:The perceived/receiver loop
You paid attention to it, it holds that much water at the very least-

The host "should"have done what he did to achieve the desired result-He either produced this of his own free-will or was paid to create this fetid cloaca of a docu-glopumentary, with the BBC's stamp of collusion right there onnit.

..a verbal smack-down in public? What's, "the public?"

These people are hilarious.