meh...multiple takes, planned out stunts, not a real ghost driven car, complete with professional sound editing. What was supposed to be impressive?

It's strange the urine stream is missing in this video at 2:55
You can hear the sound effect. Was this video sanitized in response to http://videosift.com/video/Can-I-piss-on-you-8482-Ed-Asner-gets-the-upper-hand or was the urine stream never present in the original animation?

siftbot said:

Invocations (blocked) cannot be called by StukaFox because StukaFox is not privileged - sorry.

Ferazel said:

The reasoning, efficiency, or validity of the TSA is not what the video or its proponents are arguing in this video. They are not arguing for removal or even promoting a more efficient alternative to the scanning bomb-check process for airport security. From best I can gather, (the video is distracted by some hi-jinks) they are solely trying to slow down an already slow system. Playing to the traveler's fears that their naked body could be seen by others and influencing people to go through a time consuming pat down process. Thus causing the process to be less efficient and more inconvenient than it already is. This is not exactly a noble pursuit in my point of view.

Change the system using facts and alternatives (call your congressperson)... not by wasting time and resources of people who can't change anything.

Ferazel said:

I appreciate them using their constitutional rights and actually being informed about them. However, I think this campaign is a little misguided. The reason for these scans is for efficiency. Scans are useful is so the TSA doesn't need spend more money/time/manpower patting down ALL riders. So if you want to be selfish because you're squeamish about someone seeing your junk you can opt out. However, I'll hate you for it because I think those resources would be better put to patting down people who can't go through the most efficient process (people with disabilities) and saving some money for other government services.