Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Check your email for a verification code and enter it below.Don't close this box or you must fill out this form again.
Already signed up?
Log in now.
Forgot your password?
Recover it now.
Not yet a member? No problem!
Sign-up just takes a second.
Remember your password?
Log in now.
Should we shout? Should we scream? (Pink Floyd)
*blocked
pink floyd nobody home -live-august 9th 1980
*blocked
pink floyd-the final cut-unreleased short film
*blocked
roger waters-pink floyd the wall-live chicago (remastered)
*dead
And yet another best "great gig in the sky"
*blocked
Pink Floyd's Saint Tropez
*dead
Are You a Psychopath? Take the Test
Maybe you should think about what is written before throwing out disparaging remarks. My comment isn't about refusing to accept the premise of the thought experiment, it's about the premise of the thought experiment unintentionally influencing responses. Humans respond to what they know, even to the point of forcing specific questions into different meanings because one interpretation fits better with real world experiences/expectations.
The one useful aspect of the question I did point out - despite the physical anomalies - most (all?) respondents will filter the question through the moral "hardware" in the brain, making it useful for identifying the neurological basis of morality. It's an entirely other question what the usefulness of that knowledge is.
"Are you an asshole who refuses to accept the premise of a thought experiment?"
Pink Floyd ~ Sheep
*dead
Natural Testosterone Supplement
*ban
Colonel Meow's Chariot
And everyone was amazed how quickly you found a crown....
Self promoting this video
Are You a Psychopath? Take the Test
*brain
charliem - you've exactly hit on the problem with this "moral question", though in a way I believe most folks would never think of.
I remember the first time this I heard this about twenty years ago. My immediate reaction was yes on 1, no on 2, because if I flip the track switch there is an overwhelming likelihood the train will follow the secondary track and kill one person, but in the second scenario, there is no such guarantee. Every time I've pointed this out to the questioner, they try some hand-waving physics to convince me that it will work, but ultimately fail. And I'm convinced that the vast majority of people also understand this - that there really is no guarantee of derailing the train by pushing a fat person onto the tracks - and that is why most people respond the same way.
This is a very old "moral dilemma" question designed to elucidate human nature, but as charliem points out, it is completely false and thus completely invalid.
The questions are invalid in terms of interpreting the answers of respondents. On the other hand, using it as a means of probing the neurological basis of morality with fMRI is probably useful, since the relevant systems will likely be engaged regardless of the physical anomalies.
"Total Eclipse of the Heart" as 19 different divas
*promote
The Lighter Sider of Rallying - TURN SAMMY! TURN!
"Total Eclipse of the Heart" as 19 different divas
A partial list:
Adele
Cher
Edith Piaf
Bette Midler
Julie Andrews
Bernadette Peters
Gwen Stefani
Zooey Deschanel
Britney Spears
Shakira
Alanis Morisette
Joni Mitchell (?)
Christina Aguilera
Celine Dion
Selena (?)
Barbra Streisand
"Total Eclipse of the Heart" as 19 different divas
That was awesome!
Anyone got a list of the divas? Quick check on yt didn't help.
Who was the winking diva? Madonna, maybe?
A few I know she didn't do that I'd love to see her attempt:
Dolly Parton
Janis Joplin
Tina Turner