notice the mobile phone interference in the first minute.
strange seeing as it was 1977...

:-o

oop, after listening to the whole thing i'd have preferred to downvote. oh well

he must have had something like a prefrontal lobe disruption, an effect of this is that you think you feel a presence of somebody/thing nearby.
but more striking is that it can end up making you see greater meanings in seemingly insignificant things, sometimes all the way to hallucinations.
many of the most bizarre religious leaders/speakers have had this too.

he appears quite normal otherwise, but some slight malfunction/hemorraging back in the late 1980s seems to have had this mild but lasting effect.
i'm wondering if alex jones has something similar, but then there's some obvious differences..

what's surprising though is that they're very articulate and seemingly intelligent in other ways
(similar to how some scientists might happen to believe some contradictory religious babble).
partitioning of the so-called mind, from reason and logic.

An intelligent and inquisitive interviewer too, makes a change.

My eyes and ears just melted, but it's okay, because it was.... AWESOME!

i hope josh homme pulled his usual shit afterwards with the sound guy,
where the hell was anything josh was doing in the mix..

It's not like the american government was replaced, it's business as usual.
The real reason they've been sent there is not for the afghani's sakes.

Started off really good...

Reasonable explanations win 'every' time.
In an experiment such as this, if it was conducted perfectly, then it's tiny ques that our minds pick up on, even unconsciously.
40% is just the kind of stat you might expect from people trying to 'figure out' the answer, rather than just giving a random answer.

from the wiki on sheldrake :
'The non-randomness of test sequences could thus lead to implicit or explicit pattern learning when feedback is provided. When the patterns being guessed mirror naturally occurring guessing patterns. the results could go above or below chance levels even without feedback. Thus significant results could occur purely from non-random guessing.[30] Non-randomization is one of seven flaws in parapsychological research identified by Marks.'
(add confirmation bias and experimenter bias to the list of problems).

Text book example of how to avoid a question.

the cops reaction at her ridiculous talk makes me think it's real, she's just mental, and sh ethinks that the reason the dog goes for crotch is some kinda penis envy or something. the warden seems spot on about it being more mental because of the way the owner is.

aw it's *dead, youtube killed it.

well i'm convinced, yes sir. sign me up.

gas cannister and a device that shoots electricity is not the safest combo, but potentially super funny.

hi january