*beg

Ooops, thanks. Fixed it now

In reply to this comment by eric3579:
It's dead

In reply to this comment by campionidelmondo:
*promote

whoops, fixed the dead embed. Tried to make the video start at a specific time but doesn't work?!

*promote

*quality

Congrats to @blankfist for getting wood!

Someone please explain what's good about this.

It was fun, I liked it. A good way to experiment without making any definite changes. I especially liked that voting was anonymous and that people don't have access to the voted up and voted down lists of people.

*ban

The title almost makes it sound like you ignore people who send you private profile messages

It's a completely different performance, so I don't see how it could be a dupe. Am I missing something?

>> ^ponceleon:

I will play DNF on my PC, but I'm going to wait till the price comes down (which I would give 3-5 weeks). No way am I paying $50 for this, history or no...


If you've played Duke3d when you were younger, wait for the price to go waaaay down, because it will most likely ruin any good memories you've had of the character. Or you might be one of the few people who really enjoy DNF, who knows. I'm certainly not and I didn't even expect anything good from it.

Yep, definitely a plothole. I only noticed it a a while ago when seeing the movie for perhaps the 20th time...definitely felt like I should've noticed it before...and suddenly you can't not notice it.

If it bugs you too much and since it's time travel, you can always imagine some rules that will make it fit. Examples:

1) Doc and Marty are time travelers and thus isolated from time changes that happen around them. The future that old Biff returns to is actually different, but since they're just standing outside in the street they don't notice it.

2) The future old Biff returns to is the same, because all the events including Marty's retrieval of the Almanac already took place. However, since time is still a straight (but distorted) line to Doc and Marty, they first have to go "back" to the altered present, then go to the past and so on.

3) There are no time lines, it's all parallel universes.

>> ^dag:

I can see you really don't understand. You seem to think I don't want to get involved and want to leave things to self-regulation. Actually, I like being very involved but would prefer to have things left to group regulation. I have issues with authority myself - I don't like one person calling the shots on disciplinary matters - that's far from wanting things to be left on their own.
There's a history of abuse in profile comments on the Sift. I don't want it to go unchecked, or other members to view these types of abusive dialog and think that this is permitted and OK.
I'm sorry I was patronising. I don't believe in "mock quotes".

Alright, I guess I misunderstood your stance on your involvement. Point taken. I also get that certain discourses shed a bad light on sifter interactions and there's certainly no reason to keep these kind of exchanges public. And when they are public, I guess it's good to know that someone will step in at some point.

Oh boy, they're at it again...