I'm all for T&A, nudity, lesbians making out, and porn (Woo Hoo!) However, I stood up because I'm noticing that the content on VS is pushing the boundries every day, and while we can down vote all day long, most people will upvote T&A, Nudity, lesbians making out and Porn... why? Because SEX SELLS. Its been with us since the dawn of time and will continue to be with us. Few people object anymore and I was surprised no one (see comment section) objected to the original video that showed frontal nudity, which supports my point. My Wild Things video was to prove a point and ask the question: ok where does VS draw the line? I guess now we know a little better. I hated to have to speak up but I shouldn't have to (especially since I'm all for it - BUT NOT HERE). I guess I care too much about VS to see it become just another regular site.

Siftquistion!!! VIVA LA RESISTANCE!

LOL! :-P ~

I'll hold my tongue from now on. Sorry.

:-/

(Please delete this blog)

I care less about this video and it being downvoted. I care more about the VS Standards in which seem to going to the wayside and no one objecting. More of these types of videos will find their way onto VS and it totally contradicts what the rules are. THAT'S the issue I'm bringing up. I'm finding it harder and harder to care about anything anymore because the "squeeky wheel" turns out to be more annoying than helpful.

*blog

VS Posting Rules: "We do not want pornography or "snuff" films (in which people die). There are plenty of other sites that have these markets covered, but it's not for us."

The definition of pornography (according to websters) is "any sexually explicit writing and/or picture intended to arouse sexual desire" which http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=19286 violates VS rules clearly, therefore, why isn't this discarded?

To answer your question: Smut-Fest? Isn't that the pot calling the kettle black? So who exactly is setting the rules if its ok for one person to post nudity/pornography and not another since obviously this appears to be a question of what exactly is pornography and what isn't (i.e. What turns you on?) As far as VS turning into a smut-fest, well, if these links don't push it into that catagory, yours does. So why discriminate this movie if yours is just the beginning?

All mine is, is a combination of: http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=10552 (Kissing) and your video: http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=19286 which shows breasts (Since that's OK) and as far as pushing the boundries, these others support this: http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=19293 (breasts)
http://www.videosift.com/story.php?id=19111 (more breasts)

Dotdude, Ant, original VS members... I'm calling you out because I feel I'm the only one enforcing what appears to be a obsolete rule.

What happened to the "Moderators"?...The ones who set the rules to begin with? I'm raising the red flag not because I'm offended by breasts (Love the clip BTW) but because I believed in what I thought the original founders of the group did about VS, to have a clean safe place to enjoy videos. Do we not care anymore? I hate to be the bad guy but I thought VS was self-moderated, supported by the original moderators.

We need to talk about this because someone is sending the wrong signal out and more will follow unless we either abandon this rule or enforce it.

*discard

(Found it under bad tag lines)

I can also imagine a Top 100 Too Cute Award Catagory...

And the award for cutiest video on the net is... ;-)

Can you submit a video you submitted? (I'm asking because of one I submitted shot through the roof (My client wants) and I think that qualifies as one of the top 100.

I want one for Christmas! :-D

With moves like these, Can you imagine if you programmed it to do Kung Fu moves? OMG!

(Its just a matter of time...)

*blog - Um... Isn't this a kid/pre-teen friendly site? Wasn't that the reason VS has the no porn rule? (Don't get me wrong, I love nudity but thats what GROUPER.com is for) If this passes, then what else is next?

*Save

MLX, I'm HERE!!!

Ghost? Nah... but a wonderful Viral video! Uses a lot of common themes (lost, dark night, ghost hitch hiker who happens to be a woman who also happens to wear white) She is either trying to get home, relay a message, or just likes to go for rides.

Also, the "one person survived" and "police are baffled" gives credibility (along with any given date - in this case 1983), A+ for special fx of the ghostie affecting the camera. (IRL ghosts cause a white magnetic line that goes from top down when recording.

Not to mention they suck batteries dry almost instantly!) The cut scene from one video to another is the blur and another A+ for the dripping fluid scene at the end. Being Halloween, its a nice scare and feels real enough to be spooky!

- 5 Year Paranormal Investigator & Counting! -
BNSA

That's why I like my porn with music and no talking because when they open their mouths (to talk) it just ruins it. :-)

Actually Ladybug, its too much medication that causes him to convulse and shake like he does. When they don't take medication, its difficult for them to move.

This is why Ghosts will never be accepted by main stream science because as of this posting, you can't contain and experiment on a ghost in controled conditions. Whats funny is that some of this is right on the money, but some of it is really silly. :-)