Just about every episode of QI should get a spot in the top 15 at some point. God I love this show, might have to upload some more clips.

Pretty good parody. I'm surprised the original didn't get more traction here, its pretty great. http://www.videosift.com/video/william-yes-we-can

Off one of the best albums ever made. Gotta love NMH.

>> ^BillOreilly:
Obama is a criminal, and Hillary has every right to call him on it.


Except for the fact that they said several times that there are no ties to Obama or any hint that he was involved in anything illegal. Try to make that claim about Hillary.

Love This American Life.

This is why we can't have nice things. I hate people.

"Yes this is my newsletter with my name on the front in a massive font and it was run by my closest advisers but as far as content goes I have no idea what was ever written in it or by who."


God I hate Ron Paul and anyone that refuses to acknowledge he is racist and insane. Somebody already beat me to the TNR article on him. Here's another fun link.

http://digg.com/2008_us_elections/Ron_Paul_repeatedly_sponsors_bill_to_neuter_Supreme_Court


P.S He definitely wrote some of em!
http://img.waffleimages.com/7e9adffe40398e9bd991ca62dd3fb24a9c5f019d/pauldickxr0.jpg
http://img.waffleimages.com/eefb19a921adfef0185c218992c7029aa65da152/ronpaullz3.png
http://img.waffleimages.com/2ae0216804563497a778a46834e259250a5930ab/paulrf2.jpg
http://img.waffleimages.com/2ae0216804563497a778a46834e259250a5930ab/paulrf2.jpg

P.P.S. He's never going to get elected.

He didn't even get 4th in Iowa. But hey, nice blimp.

This is stupid. BicycleRepairMan basically summed it up. Its not stereo types of Arabs, ITS TERRORISTS or other bad guys. Its a problem with the viewer when they associate all Arabs as being terrorists, not movies for having villains. You could make a similar video for just about any race / group just picking out when that race/ group were villains.

You could make an argument for their not being enough positive roles etc etc, but mostly this video and the point its trying to make is just silly.

Wow you just got my hopes so high in a HOW DID I MISS THIS kind of way. I'm glad HBO got the rights if anybody could do this series justice it'd be them. I'm still pretty skeptical though. If anybody but http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0227759/ plays The Imp I'll be sad.

I love Q.I. and Stephen Fry. So good.

Man grind house was good I can't belive they didn't put these on the DVDs, or so I heard.

Reeks of viral but cool.

Fringe sites?

The first site is a major white power group, that is firmly supporting Ron Paul, that doesn't raise any flags?

The second site is PRO Ron Paul, and is just an archives of his blogs. As for not scary, if you don't find

"The notion of a rigid separation between church and state has no basis in either the text of the Constitution or the writings of our Founding Fathers."

at least a little scary, well then thats on you.

The next site is an archive of the Ron Paul Report. The only rebuttal I have seen for this is his claim that he had them ghost written, yet he is still responsible for what is published in them. He also hasn't come out against many of the blatantly racist quotes published UNDER HIS NAME.

The next site isn't super popular, but if you had bothered to read it, you would see that its mostly pulling from an article in the Washington Post, very fringe.

The last in a You Tube video showing all of the money Ron Paul has invested in gold and gold production.

The last is an extremely well constructed post, backing up everything with links to either Ron Pauls official site, or thomas.loc.gov. Again, very fringe.

So I don't really understand what you are getting at? Are you saying he did not say the quotes that are being attributed to him? Or that he did not try to pass the legislation being credited to him? I think its pretty clear you especially did not look at the last link and how well researched it is. But hey keep on rocking the free world.

-----
"Way to support the CFR while injecting your race card, wake."

I don't know what that means, but going by your user name you are probably in favor of Ron Paul, and once again have failed to post anything resembling a rebuttal to Ron Pauls actual policy.

Much like snoozedoctor said, you fail at economics if you think returning the gold standard would do anything other than cripple our country. If you want to talk about fractional reserve banking, maybe you could have something resembling an intelligent discourse, but supporting the gold standard just represents a shocking lack of understanding about economics for someone that wants to be President.

I want to just post the same thing to every Ron Paul thread, since the same stuff seems to come up again and again, but I'm not sure what video sifts policy on that is. Instead I'll just post some links with the heading:

READ THIS STUFF BEFORE YOU SUPPORT RON PAUL FOR THE LOVE OF GOD:


Or a nice summary of all his crazy:
http://www.iidb.org/vbb/showthread.php?p=5000274#post5000274
(at least read that, please, especially the gold standard part)

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=388512
http://www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul148.html (4th paragraph for the lazy)
http://www.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/g/ftp.py?people/g/gannon.dan/1992/gannon.0793
http://www.offthekuff.com/mt/archives/007597.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s4QbJ3phEYs

Probably Barack Obama at this point. Although since America is still pretty racist I have doubts about his ability to get elected. I support him because he is not Ron Paul. But I'm glad you focused your reply at me rather than rebutting anything I posted about Ron Paul. KEEP THE DREAM ALIVE. I hope you guys get your blimp.