"This video has been removed by the user."

*dead

)

What's rule 63? Anything like rule 34?

It also means "sassy black girl" in Every Teen Movie.

Isn't that standard operating procedure? Even if it wasn't the exact same clip, it was, I assume, an alternative version of the same race footage which means this is a dupe and this video should have been declared as an alternative embed on @antonye's post.

This sort of thing really isn't representative of the game. It happens and, as such, it happens too much but it's not the epidemic that it's made out to be.
It's always happened but it's only since we got a thousand slow motion any-angle replays that it's been noticed.

I don't know what 'the box' means but what the referee sees in the moment is nearly always what stands. No replays, no post-match analysis, unless the newspapers cause an almighty stink - causing justice to be dealt out based on media hysteria.

The official bodies say that this is to not undermine the referee, although I think it would be just the opposite and that FIFA and IFAB are undermining referees right now by letting TV views see all their mistakes without letting them use the same technology to avoid such mistakes. It wouldn't have taken 5 seconds for a video referee to review this and see what happened so he could relay this down to the referee who would book #7 for simulation and revoke #8's second booking.



It doesn't matter in the long run but IMHO, #7 doesn't look like a little pansy to me. He doesn't look soft, he doesn't look weak. Player #7 looks like a cynical cheat, not a softie. He's been clever and gained a significant advantage for his team.

He'd only look weak if anyone actually believed he was that hurt but no one did, he just forced the referee into making a decision (as he can't act like he didn't see it). I suspect the referee knew better, but he could only officiate on what he saw - the ball going from player A's boot into player B's face and even if player B isn't hurt that's against the rules if intentional. As play had stopped, it's rather unlikely to accidentally hit someone's face ... but not impossible, obviously.

There's plenty of tough players who I would not want to get into a fight with, but it's not as tough as ice hockey which seems to be a game for psychopaths. It's not as tough as rugby or American football on the whole, although the distinction's not as clear cut.

I'd assume (after being flustered for a moment, I am British) that it was either a prank, or I'd get robbed of either my possessions or a kidney.

Obama from '06 and '08 would have honoured him. I kinda miss that guy.

Did the guy (a dentist?) park like that to protect his car? How, by blocking the space beside so much that no one would bother parking there?

The afterburner uses the 2 main exhausts, you can see it in action when the plane lifts at 0:23 just before the central flame starts. I think it's switched off after a few seconds.

I'm not sure what the point of this is, I can only think it is to ensure dumped fuel isn't rained upon anyone. Maybe pilots can roast marshmallows when they're at base, I don't know.

VoodooV, he's Muslim therefore he's anti-Christian and anti-American and so he's biased.

It's hardly surprising, as that's what Fox News is. They're "Christian" (I doubt they've read much more of the Bible than they've read his book) and they think have a biased all-are-enemy view of Muslims and the Middle East, IMHO. It probably doesn't occur to them that other people see the world differently.

That's what's happening here. Person/organisation of religion A blindingly accusing person of religion B of being anti-A, for no other reason that person of religion A is blatantly anti-B. Fox are doing what they're accusing him of.

Maybe he's booker because he has ...

(•_•)
( •_•)>⌐■-■
(⌐■_■)

Dewitt?

(That's not even true, Fry's wittier, but that's not going to let me get in the way of an irrelevant Bioshock Infinite pun.)

Attention to a cause is the point of terrorism, even if they don't do it for the personal infamy they're doing it to draw attention to something and publicising them is in part publicising their cause.

I wonder where I am in line. Probably around 5,000,000th, slightly above average as almost of my family tree is British.

Any day now.

To pick up the coin without getting your fingers wet, why not just tip the water out? Too simple?